dark light

Snapper

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,011 through 5,025 (of 6,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Look What I've Found #2097534
    Snapper
    Participant

    There’s no date reference, like a newspaper or anything.

    Don’t come all knowledgeable to us mr.

    in reply to: General Discussion #402033
    Snapper
    Participant

    I got burnt when I was prawning yesterday. But who cares? IT’S SUMMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    in reply to: The summer is back! #1978140
    Snapper
    Participant

    I got burnt when I was prawning yesterday. But who cares? IT’S SUMMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    in reply to: Another one for the 10D 'Masters' #2097605
    Snapper
    Participant

    That shouldn’t work out though – you *should* use the palm and adjust by 1 stop for the correct EV. Don’t tell me Canon have altered the rules of photography AGAIN?

    Anyways, I can’t read histograms. I don’t understand them.

    I had a shot with an exposure that I checked and rechecked about 5 times – a CWGC wargrave in France. On the screen, it was whited out totally. Even zoomed right in I could make out nothing. On the PC it was spot on. Other times, when it’s too dark, it’s spot on. And yet others, when it looks ok, it is – though the next time those are way out. ****ing things. I have grey cards on order again (lost my last one in Normandy) which I used to use only with my 6×9 and tranny film.

    Now check this out – this is the camera set at 125/5.6, 550ex on ETTL, and it looks great on the screen, and great on my PC. (It tasted even greater, washed down with a chilled Sauvignon! haha). So why the hell can’t I rely on it at other times? And outside is the worst. At Legends, taking the meter reading the same way I have for years, (off the runway / grass, depending on which was the closest in tone to an 18% grey) and setting manually, everything was massively washed out – but i start drastically underexposing and bingo! And I was shooting transparencies previously, so it isn’t down to print film / paper latitude.

    That’s it. I’m gonna run it against my other meters and find out what the hell is going on.

    And while I think of it Damien, can you let me know which parameters YOU prefer, so that I can set them later this month (!)

    in reply to: Happy Birthday TomW – 57 OTU Pix #2097612
    Snapper
    Participant

    try http://www.hannants.co.uk for decal sheets – they stock code letters and numbers etc in a range of scales and colours etc.

    And yes, the a/c looked so different to the ones we see in museums / at airshows (or don’t see, in the case of Janie). They were tools back then, with a limited life expectancy. But I bet they could, in the main, fly as well, if not better than those still around.

    in reply to: AirSpace at Duxford #2097617
    Snapper
    Participant

    Who cares? It’s a bus. A fast bus, yes, but just a bus. way to many civvy buses anyway.

    in reply to: Another one for the 10D 'Masters' #2097662
    Snapper
    Participant

    I concur with Damien.

    Am really pissed off with the screen – can’t judge exposure with it at all. And what a bitch for getting the exposure right in contrasty light – far more hassle than film. I can’t trust the meter, and the screen gets right on my ****.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday TomW – 57 OTU Pix #2097674
    Snapper
    Participant

    No problem mate. What size would you like, and whats your address? My email is: [email]609photos@tiscali.co.uk[/email]

    Sales are sales! All buyers are welcome! And welcome to our ‘home’, too.

    And any reference from Merlin is bad – he’s a Scot and tight with his money. And when he does pay, it’s with those Monopoly notes you have up there!

    in reply to: Biplane flights available #2097701
    Snapper
    Participant

    Eeh, my wound is full of salt.

    in reply to: Biplane flights available #2097795
    Snapper
    Participant

    That looks about the priciest I found. Can’t recall prices, but I went up to Old Warden on the DH Moth charity day (and didn’t get a flight due to weather). That was £55.

    in reply to: Hendon Lancaster on Perch (NOT!) #2097926
    Snapper
    Participant

    I spotted the perch down at Duxford today. And guess where?

    You got it. Perefct fit too.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday TomW – 57 OTU Pix #2097928
    Snapper
    Participant

    Yeah, i’ve done that mate. Been Googling since yesterday – nearly Google-eyed I am. Have a few units to check out though, and don’t have the books. That RAF Commands site is very handy for units / dates, but I need more specific things right now.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday TomW – 57 OTU Pix #2097998
    Snapper
    Participant

    By coincidence (these pix were taken 1941 – 42 by my friend who had by then left 609), it turns out that Babe Haddon was at 57 OTU from 2/10/41 until 9/12/41. Screwball Beurling was also there – and was a right scruffy bugger who wouldn’t polish his buttons etc.

    Just thought i’d add that. And now, I need gen on this unit if anyone has any! To use to write my Johnny Wiseman / Alan Haddon story.

    Cheers.

    in reply to: In Memory of Johnny and Babe #2098002
    Snapper
    Participant

    Seems like so long ago now…..

    As those of you who were there will recall, I ran out of Order of Services – only printed 100 (!). A few of you saked for a copy afterwards. Well, I now have some more of the card and can print them off, so please post on this thread (can’t be deleted by me then, and it keeps the thread up the top! Don’t forget your address) and i’ll get them printed. I will post or retain until the meet-up in October as you prefer.

    in reply to: What a stonking issue! #2098029
    Snapper
    Participant

    Don’t forget the Croix de Guerre!

    I emailed press releases and pictures sufficent for the news sections – whats a small paragraph and a picture at a minimum?

    But hey, they have a memorial now, thats the main thing, and Bee has received long-awaited recognition.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,011 through 5,025 (of 6,311 total)