Based on what information Goldust?
Yet again you assert that some new Chinese equipment in this case the 052D is better then every single US vessel in service. Based on what information? If you answer “It has new AESA” without any comparative performance stats then yet again all you are peddling is hot air and bravado by jingo!
An assertion made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Name me one US warship that can match Type 052D in technology. :rolleyes:
Do you have any other sources than Wikipedia?
http://www.rjlee.org/air/ds-aaloss/
1 J-10B fighter jet is so advanced it can destroy 10 F-16C Block 50 in a single sortie before returning to base to refuel and rearm. How many F-16 fighter jets is America willing to sacrifice over Taiwan? :rolleyes:
Yeah, lol, it would end the same way too. The US leading a coalition to blast them back over their own border. So yes, I agree it should be China’s model :dev2:
The US wouldn’t even dare touch China. China is no Iraq. :rolleyes: The US lost 23 planes in 1991 Gulf War. The US would lose 2,300 planes to Chinese air defense, planes, ships. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_combat_losses_of_United_States_military_aircraft_since_the_Vietnam_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_093_submarine
Length 110 m, beam 11m :dev2: that’s bigger than Los Angeles class and wider than Virginia class. I put it on par with Improved Los Angeles class. Subs are easier to hide from enemy intelligence. Warships like Type 052D are not as easy to hide. Type 052D is more advanced than any existing US navy warship.
http://chinesemilitaryreview.blogspot.ca/2013/08/type-052d-class-guided-missile.html
China’s model for invasion of Taiwan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Kuwait
Have to agree. This is by far the most promising design that ever came from China, IMHO.
IMO I personally like J-10B’s design more than this one. I’m more a fan of centerline intake for single engines rather than lateral intakes.
Germany lost 783 submarines over a few year in WW2. America better hope it doesn’t lose over 40 submarines fighting China over Taiwan. :dev2:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Atlantic
Type 041 is the deadlier sub in the Chinese seas. Being AIP diesel electric, they are much quieter than their American SSN counterparts. Building another 15 Type 041.
Best option for China would be to do what Iraq did in its successful 1991 invasion of Kuwait. A quick attack followed by setting up a puppet regime.
China is politically united, Taiwan is not. There are like what, 10 political parties in Taiwan. Whichever political party that is stupid enough to declare independence is bound to be targeted by its opposition. The insurgency could be Taiwanese against Taiwanese, rather than Taiwanese against Chinese.
How exactly would Taiwan mount a guerilla warfare? They cannot get supplies from the outside. :confused:
That’s not an explanation, it’s just you making noise.
It’s the easiest thing in the world to say one thing is better than another. I could easily say I’m better than Dave Murray (Iron Maiden) on Guitar, but that doesn’t prove anything unless we both plug into a Marshall stack and see what we’re capable of, in any case I’m not, but I could have that mentality and totally believe I am and be ignorant to his capabilities. Much like what you do on here with your “knowledge” of the technology industry. So, why not wake up and provide some solid, reliable and official evidence supporting your claims? How hard can it be?
If I say a = aleph = alpha, I would be right. :applause: Same idea.
I’m touring around right now, different time zones are common, body clock is getting more messed up day after day… So a laugh won’t go a miss. So, please explain this in another essay since you failed your first one. Can you do that?
An essay is more than a silly sentence. Go on, give it a try. Explain in detail, make someone close proud!
Think of it this way. Type 052D and J-10B are on par in technology. Type 052D > Arleigh Burke Flight IIA. J-10B > F-16 Block 60. Type 093 is on par with J-10A and Type 052C and Los Angeles Improved and F-16 Block 40 in technology. F-22 is on par with Seawolf in technology. F-35 is on par with Virginia in technology. J-20 > F-22. Type 095 is on par with J-20 in technology. Type 095 > Seawolf.
I’ll bet it has DSI too… I’m not expert on submarines, so I can’t comment either way. I would say that the U.S. has the numbers with subs. It will take the PLAN decades to build a navy that resembles that of the U.S.
The USN may have the numbers in subs. But with no funding, how is the USN going to operate them? http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Besides, quality triumphs quality. 1 Type 095 can take on and destroy like 10 Improved Los Angeles and 5 Virginia.
They haven’t landed on the moon yet…
T minus 2 months.
Perhaps, but it doesn’t matter the “Y-20FQ” is not going to be built.
Doesn’t matter. Type 095 is a Seawolf killer. :applause: