dark light

Andy in Beds

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 3,233 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #274657
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Bring it on, I say.
    It’ll make a change.

    in reply to: The end of the world. #1873101
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Bring it on, I say.
    It’ll make a change.

    in reply to: General Discussion #275037
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    He’s a nice Kiwi lad who frequents this place.
    Knows his stuff on Kiwi aviation too.

    We’ve talked together about The Great War a bit over the years.

    He won’t be happy though.

    Andy

    in reply to: White orcs on steroids crush All Blacks #1873416
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    He’s a nice Kiwi lad who frequents this place.
    Knows his stuff on Kiwi aviation too.

    We’ve talked together about The Great War a bit over the years.

    He won’t be happy though.

    Andy

    in reply to: Red Tails DVD #952363
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    But i can watch the BofB movie time n time again. I think the real aircraft help 😉

    Yes it was pretty wooden.
    Everytime Christopher Plummer made an entrance it was like a dining chair had been thrown on the set.

    I still think it was a half a step up on the later offerings being discussed here though.

    And as you say, real aeroplanes (mostly) did help.

    A.

    in reply to: Red Tails DVD #952475
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    It was entertainment

    Sadly, it didn’t even make the grade there either.
    As to it being a tribute to the men of the 332nd Fighter Group–best not to go there.

    With these films, it isn’t the CGI that I really object to (though it is mostly awful), it’s the abysmal scripts.
    Why everything has to scripted so a two year old can grasp it I have no clue.
    And it doesn’t even help to sell a film to wider audience (as someone will no doubt claim) because another feature of Flyboys, Red Tails, etc is that they all bombed at the box office.
    So maybe the audiences are not as stupid as the film makers believe.
    New formula required.

    in reply to: General Discussion #275175
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    p.s. Rearly, you didn’t know what SW and OS meant! What a bunch of computer n00bs! :dev2:

    No desire to know to be honest.
    I treat the computer the way most people treat the modern car–if it starts, I can move it (just) from a to b.

    My interst and knowledge of what goes on inside an internal combustion engine is I presume considered archaic in many circles.

    A.

    in reply to: Problems with the forum SW #1873538
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    p.s. Rearly, you didn’t know what SW and OS meant! What a bunch of computer n00bs! :dev2:

    No desire to know to be honest.
    I treat the computer the way most people treat the modern car–if it starts, I can move it (just) from a to b.

    My interst and knowledge of what goes on inside an internal combustion engine is I presume considered archaic in many circles.

    A.

    in reply to: General Discussion #275853
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Well my friend.
    As a wise man once said.

    “It’s amazing just how much information is available on the internet. It’s even more amazing just how much of it is complete cr*p”.

    If you’re using the serious sections of this forum as a reference library on aviation I’d say this: I’d treat 50% as surmise, another 25% as just plain disinformation and the rest as something close to the truth.

    Also, and it’s a small point but of interest to photographers and artists, many pictures will be copyright to someone or other.
    So if you’re copying stuff, you might like to ask permission first, from the photographer etc

    And perhaps, seeing as you’re also such an aficionado yourself, why don’t actully contribute on one of the serious parts of this forum (Historic, General Aviation, Airliners etc) rather than posting obscure technical complaints on this bit, which is the rather light hearted, away from aviation section..?

    Andy

    in reply to: Problems with the forum SW #1874171
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Well my friend.
    As a wise man once said.

    “It’s amazing just how much information is available on the internet. It’s even more amazing just how much of it is complete cr*p”.

    If you’re using the serious sections of this forum as a reference library on aviation I’d say this: I’d treat 50% as surmise, another 25% as just plain disinformation and the rest as something close to the truth.

    Also, and it’s a small point but of interest to photographers and artists, many pictures will be copyright to someone or other.
    So if you’re copying stuff, you might like to ask permission first, from the photographer etc

    And perhaps, seeing as you’re also such an aficionado yourself, why don’t actully contribute on one of the serious parts of this forum (Historic, General Aviation, Airliners etc) rather than posting obscure technical complaints on this bit, which is the rather light hearted, away from aviation section..?

    Andy

    in reply to: General Discussion #275946
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Well I listened as I spannered a Honda 900.
    The bit about Spitfires was cr*p–It was five minutes before the end, and had John Nichol (Gawd knows why he’s suddenly an expert on Supermarine products) spouting about how valuable it’d all be.
    So, a complete waste of time.

    However, earlier in the show, they did a piece on the Burma railway which featured a couple of old boys who had been ‘guests’ of the Japs.
    I’ll tell you, find it on I-player and listen..! If you’re not moved, you’re either dead or made from asbestos.
    It was a very good piece indeed.

    Whether Mr Vine needed to go all the way to Rangoon himself, remains to be seen but I was left with a lasting impression of the country.
    If it carries on improving, I can see myself fancying a trip there one day.

    A.

    in reply to: The BBC #1874269
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    Well I listened as I spannered a Honda 900.
    The bit about Spitfires was cr*p–It was five minutes before the end, and had John Nichol (Gawd knows why he’s suddenly an expert on Supermarine products) spouting about how valuable it’d all be.
    So, a complete waste of time.

    However, earlier in the show, they did a piece on the Burma railway which featured a couple of old boys who had been ‘guests’ of the Japs.
    I’ll tell you, find it on I-player and listen..! If you’re not moved, you’re either dead or made from asbestos.
    It was a very good piece indeed.

    Whether Mr Vine needed to go all the way to Rangoon himself, remains to be seen but I was left with a lasting impression of the country.
    If it carries on improving, I can see myself fancying a trip there one day.

    A.

    in reply to: General Discussion #276355
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    If the children are in a caring, loving environment what the hell do the politics of the foster parents matter?

    Well apparently in Rotherham it does.

    PeeDee.
    I’d be interested to hear your partner’s views on this.
    I did wonder myself if there was more going on than the media reptiles allowed us to know.
    I have to say though, I’m still more inclined to settle behind my initial point though–happy to be proved wrong though.

    in reply to: Is this social engineering? #1874650
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    If the children are in a caring, loving environment what the hell do the politics of the foster parents matter?

    Well apparently in Rotherham it does.

    PeeDee.
    I’d be interested to hear your partner’s views on this.
    I did wonder myself if there was more going on than the media reptiles allowed us to know.
    I have to say though, I’m still more inclined to settle behind my initial point though–happy to be proved wrong though.

    in reply to: General Discussion #276411
    Andy in Beds
    Participant

    For those of you who do care, you can see her here.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20476654

    Usual obscurations rather than straight answers–the usual blanket–it’s in the interst of the children blah, blah.

    It’s a pity the authorities don’t take such close interest in many of the excesses that occur in care homes.

    Quite frankly, I reckon many children would be safer fostered even by that nice Uncle Adolf and Auntie Eva than they are in privately run care homes which takes hundreds (if not tens of thousands) of Pounds a week from the tax-payer etc.

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 3,233 total)