How good are the Iranian MiG 29s are they as obsolete as the Serbian ones were during the Kosovo war ?
They appear to be in a lot worse shape than F-14s. Its amazing how Iran kept F-14s in shape.
I wouldn’t say Mihg-29s are as bad as Serbians were though. They should have enough of them at least to fly the ones with capable of shooting radar guided missiles, and to keep the “blind” ones grounded.
I am surprised that SR-71 was on public display in 1974. Were Soviets not allowed in π
Just as much I’m surprised that F-15 and F-16 were on public display in 1976, the year they entered service.
Just seems too early considering the secrecy and heat of cold war. Those were three top aircraft of US air force.
love to see pic like that though!
thanks for posting!
I am surprised that SR-71 was on public display in 1974. Were Soviets not allowed in π
Just as much I’m surprised that F-15 and F-16 were on public display in 1976, the year they entered service.
Just seems too early considering the secrecy and heat of cold war. Those were three top aircraft of US air force.
love to see pic like that though!
thanks for posting!
Marine Gen. James Mattis, head of U.S. Central Command :Syrian air defense complicates US options
The advanced air defense weapons Russia has provided to Syria’s regime would make it difficult to establish a no-fly zone there as part of an effort to help the rebellion, the top U.S. commander in the Middle East told senators Tuesday.
Marine Gen. James Mattis, head of U.S. Central Command, declined to detail any military options the Pentagon has developed for action against the regime. But he told the Senate Armed Services Committee that it would take a significant military commitment to create even safe havens in Syria where aid could be delivered, as Sen. John McCain suggested Monday.
http://www.defencetalk.com/general-syrian-air-defense-complicates-us-options-40796/
i agree with that. F-22 is not going to be necessery as it is only an air superiority plane, and F-18+Rafale+Typhoon are more than enough to surpress Syrian aircraft that take off. I also agree Israel will stand by waiting to see what happens, and act against Iran if some chain retaliation occurs.
Unless of coarse there are new upgrades/radars/missiles in Syrian arsenals, and new surprise tactics planned. Maybe even least expected upgraded Mig-29 surprise attack.
I’m certain it is confirmed that Syrian early warning radars (possibly more than that) capability has been greatly upgraded very recently by Russia with mutual defense interest.
ok, just to gather some opinions/possibilities.
IF it comes to NATO intervention, or some US led No fly zone/rebel protection which of coarse includes eliminating Syrian Air defences, would:
#1 F-22s be involved?
#2 Rafales and Typhoons get knocked down by Syrian SA-11 Buk systems, or Pantsirs?
#3 Would Israel participate in bombardment ?
things are getting worse. Instead of working on peace, everyone seems to be working on making another war over there, so I ask you.
Here is latest senator McCain’s opinion. WAR!!WAR!!!
damn! Easy for him to say, his ass won’t get a scratch either way.
indeed,
is there source of higher rez pictures of above one on the ground ?
thanks
20 MiG-29K and four MiG-29KUB carrier-based fighter aircraft.
what does this mean about Su-33s? Upgrades, decommission? How many multirole fighters can this ship carry at once? If 24 Mig-29Ks are taking space of Su-33s, that that seems like a downgrade of range capability.
Almost forgot how beautiful Mig-29UB is.
One of the best looking planes ever. It can compete with even Rafale’s gracious lines any time!
British Army crew avoid injury after Apache hits power line
Those long bows seem to see far but power lines..can’t miss them π
Well, What does USA have now as A-10 replacement ? Any plans?
Su-25 successor has to be able to go down and dirty! Has to be able to take bullets and survive. Not just advanced electronics for self defense.
-so Yak-130 upgrade π No way!
Its got to have improved:
– Lower IR signature than su-25
– Smaller radar signature
– Even better armor than Su-25. I’m sure Russians aren’t going to cut those corners even if its a stealth version of Su-25
– Ability to get to battle ground faster, and get the hell out faster. So possibly supersonic capability, or even super cruise capability!
I could imagine something like X-32 with wider wing span, and, well, hopefully cooler looking π
my 2 cents π
Well, no Russian ship in Syria, but Iranians have arrived!
AMMAN/BEIRUT (Reuters) – China accused Western countries of stirring civil war in Syria and two Iranian warships docked at a Syrian naval base, underscoring rising international tensions over the near year-long crisis.
http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-security-forces-clamp-down-damascus-031120777.html
Thanks for the info TEEJ! I am also radio HAM, just not that active:-)
Where are you located when “listening”
Russia is the best AD tool of Syria. After what happened in Libya, Russia will veto any move of the west (unless Obama gives on the European missile shield…), and they won’t allow their only remaining base in the region to become an US/Israeli base.
thanks for reminding us about the Russian naval base in Syria!! Wander what would have happened if Russians had a big active one in Montenegro in 1999 π
But to stay on subject!
here is Wiki’s overview.
Russian naval base
Tartus hosts a Soviet-era naval supply and maintenance base, under a 1971 agreement with Syria, which is still staffed by Russian naval personnel. The base was established during the Cold War to support the Soviet Navy fleet in the Mediterranean Sea.[7] During the 1970s, similar support points were located in Egypt and Latakia, Syria. In 1977, the Egyptian support bases at Alexandria and Mersa Matruh were evacuated and the ships and property were transferred to Tartus, where the naval support base was transformed into the 229th Naval and Estuary Vessel Support Division. Seven years later, the Tartus support point was upgraded to the 720th Logistics Support Point.[8]
In 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed and its Mediterranean fleet, the 5th Mediterranean Squadron which was composed of ships from the Northern Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet, ceased its existence. Since then, there have been occasional expeditions by Russian Navy vessels and submarines to the Mediterranean Sea. The naval logistics support base in Syria is now part of the Black Sea Fleet. It consists of three floating docks of which one is operational, a floating workshop, storage facilities, barracks and other facilities.[8]
Since Russia forgave Syria of three quarters, or $9.6 billion, of its $13.4 billion Soviet-era debt and became its main arms supplier in 2006, Russia and Syria have conducted talks about allowing Russia to develop and enlarge its naval base, so that Russia can strengthen its naval presence in the Mediterranean.[9] Amid Russia’s deteriorating relations with the West, because of the 2008 South Ossetia Warβ and plans to deploy a US missile defense shield in Poland, President Assad agreed to the portβs conversion into a permanent Middle East base for Russiaβs nuclear-armed warships.[10][11] Since 2009, Russia has been renovating the Tartus naval base and dredging the port to allow access for its larger naval vessels.[12]
On September 8, 2008, ten Russian warships docked in Tartus.[13] According to Lebanese-Syrian commentator Joseph Farah, the flotilla which moved to Tartus consisted of the Moskva cruiser and four nuclear missile submarines.[14] Two weeks later, Russian Navy spokesman Igor Dygalo said the nuclear-powered battlecruiser Peter The Great, accompanied by three other ships, sailed from the Northern Fleet’s base of Severomorsk. The ships would cover about 15,000 nautical miles (28,000 km) to conduct joint maneuvers with the Venezuelan navy. Dygalo refused to comment on reports in the daily Izvestia claiming that the ships were to make a stopover in the Syrian port of Tartus on their way to Venezuela. Russian officials said the Soviet-era base there was being renovated to serve as a foothold for a permanent Russian navy presence in the Mediterranean.[15][16]
In 2009, RIA Novosti reported that the base would be made fully operational to support anti-piracy operations.[17] It would also support a Russian naval presence in the Mediterranean as a base for “guided-missile cruisers and even aircraft carriers”.[18]
In late November 2011, Pravda and Reuters announced that a naval flotilla led by the aircraft carrier Kuznetsov was on its way to the naval base in Tartus as a show of support for the al-Assad regime.
So here we are with Only Russian Aircraft carrier stopping by Syria to show support. Is it still there??
That kind of changes everything. How does NATO fly over this base and bomb, or implements no fly zone without Russian approval.
this looks like a serious chess move by Assad and Putin, based on longer term plans.
Or.. just a typical Russian bluff to get what they want from NATO.