Thanks Paul.
I’m not trying to compete with those who are using thousands of pound worth of camera equipment,
but as long as I am happy with the results, that’s all that matters really.
I’ve now given my SX40 to my wife to use.
Thanks for the comment Derek. One of the mistakes I made, and which I was aware of (but forgot).
Was that with the camera set to take multiple exposures, it doesn’t focus between shots. Not that it’s too
important when something is flying past left to right.
As said before, there is so much to consider. Do you want prop blur, some contrast in the clouds etc ?
I’ve played around with this picture. Cropped it a bit more, sharpened it a touch, and lightened the shadows.
Original picture
Modified picture
I took around 300 pictures during the time we were there, and will probably scrap 75% of them.
I suppose that’s the beauty of digital photography.
Ah beat me to it 🙂
We left at around 2pm and missed the big downpour. It’s a shame more wasn’t flying, but a nice day out all the same.
I hope you don’t mind me duplicating the photos, but they are linked to another part of the forum, as this was a new
outing for my camera.






Anyone seen a Griffon ?

We went to Duxford today. The weather wasn’t too bad, and at least it stayed dry up until we left, at just after 2pm.
Overall I was a little disappointed with the quality of my pictures, those of aircraft in the air anyway.
None seemed particularly sharp. Maybe I should have just opted for a faster speed and accepted static props ?
I’ll put a few of the best ones on the Duxford Diary thread, a little later.
I have now uploaded a few, and would appreciated any comments, good or bad. 🙂
Facsinating indeed. Reminds me of our visit to Bentwaters.
Thanks again everyone for the help and the links
I’ve also found a couple of very useful videos on Youtube,
Thanks also to Moggy for moving the posts to this thread. I didn’t even know it existed 🙂
I don’t believe that the likes of Shuttleworth, RIAT, Farnborugh and many other venues offer a senior discount, so why is it ‘an absolute disgrace’ that Duxford do not?
Maybe because they offer these concessions the rest of the time. Why not at airshows ?
The lower the ISO the less noise (use to be grain on film, looks a little like interference on digital) you get – unless your chip is full size (and you mentioned tight budget, so I imagine not) in which case you shouldn’t have any problems in day light.
Do you have a wide angle lens – unless you can step further back 55mm isn’t going to be much help for whole airframe images inside…
It did come with an 18-55mm lens, not that I will be taking too many pictures inside, as we visited a year or so back.
Sensor size is 23.2mmx15.4mm, not that it means much to me. Camera is a D3300.
Thanks for the advice. I have a fair bit of experience in photography, but not with a DSLR
I’ll be taking pictures at various locations, but as sod’s law dictates, most will be into the sun.
First trip in anger will be (hopefully) Duxford on Thursday.
The telephoto has stabilization and auto-focus, and being fairly short, shouldn’t be a big problem to track aircraft
without blurring. The auto focus is very quick too.
As said, the main problem is avoiding the aircraft coming out in silhouette if the sky is very bright.
Although I know photoshop can be of use here.
I would imagine starting with an ISO of 200, then increasing if needs dictate ?
Up until recently I’ve been using a Canon SX40 Bridge camera, It’s an excellent camera, but it does have limitations.
Weather forecast for the next few days isn’t brilliant. Although they forecast rain for today, which turned out
to be 5 minutes of drizzle.
We still plan to go Thursday, once we’ve voted.
I’ll third that…..
Otherwise a pretty run of the mill programme.
Looks nice !
It’s not only in this country where the population want more of a say.
Several countries in the EU have their version of the UKIP party.
More great pictures :applause:
We plan on visiting this Thursday.
I thought he had passed away a long time ago !
He was certainly a big name in motor racing.