fortunately I got my copy for £34 (still more than the jacket price! )
indeed, what works at one size doesnt work at another…..unless you change the gas your in!! effects are not scaleable.
thanks guys!
thanks guys!
I use an EOS 350D body, and for these shots, the Canon 100-400L IS USM Lense with a UV(0) filter. The filter gives the sky a nicer blue colour which I prefer.
Cheers
Coanda
Boeing would be the worst american company to take-over bae systems given their track record in in/ex-ternal politics. I’m sure LM would love that one!!
Should it happen, Boeing would just annexe the uk portion and order it to do whatever boeing didnt want to do state-side.
BAe systems do not do the aerodynamic design of the wings, Airbus UK does. Airbus UK also owns the assembly line at chester. Airbus UK and its major suppliers also do the structural analysis/design work on Airbus wings. I believe some people from BAe are doing some work on the Leading Edge.
coanda
Interesting, Broughton, Filton and all its many suppliers build wings for all Airbus aircraft, including the A400M, and in the near future the A350. There is no reason to assume that the next aircraft (wending its way through future projects right now) will not also have its wings built in the uk. Given the size of the investment being put into Filton, theres plenty more room for british engineering in Airbus for many years to come.
I am no politician (thank god!) but I wonder if this will just end up being the sale of a ‘name’ because, pretty much Airbus UK at one time was BAe Systems (and all the other names its been)
There is no realistic aerodynamic load redistribution since it is usual to reduce the load significantly towards the wingtip anyway. The wingtip area could actually produce negative lift if required. Note the amount of nose down twist an airliner wing in flight has. This aircraft’s wing has not been redesigned to cater for that puny piece of plastic! They may have had to put the bolt size at the mid-box/wing-tip (the area actually forming the tip of the wing) up in a couple of places, thats it! On somthing more substantial, such as the 747-8’s raked wing-tip a redesign of the outboard end would probably be required to deal with the extra loading induced by the part, and the loading system it creates, even then it would probably be limited to the mid-box to tip interface.
Both tip fences and winglets create an effective increase in aspect ratio leading to a lower drag. In fact, the direction of the lift vector of the winglet could theoretically provide ‘thrust’ to at least cancel out the induced drag of the winglet itself!
sad to see a colour scheme you have designed yourself, on a damaged aircraft.
the b&w is fantastic……i also like beluga no.5 and its ‘shadow’!!
You could try walking out to the main gate, this is basically alongside the runway. However, you will be on a very busy road. There is a layby/crashgate/access way on the other side of the road which is safer to use.
thanks dan……
oh, i only work on wing structure………whilst the 350 also has a copper mesh, apparantly, that is not the only consideration required, there are minimum edge clearances needed, and consideration of material proximity…..
its a shame the enlightened few are shouted down by the ignorant majority over there….
lightning arcing is an issue that raised its ugly head this week………
sandy, all this is tied up in risk management and assessment, you can do anything if you have enough money to spend on it……..i regularly despair at the a.net forums for their a vs b mentality.
I know of specific portable devices being developed in order to detect BVID and non-VID damage. These areas, for me, would be the main source of worry because you just dont know whats in the plate ( and we are talking values between 3 and 25mm thick carbon plates!).
as far as construction of the 787 fuselage sections go……i would expect it to be a tape laying process around a mold tool (either solid or a tool surface with internal support on a spindle, both could be heated), then autoclave. The tape will probably be laid at various angles and cured in an autoclave, with the tool in-situ throughout the process.
there are some great ways to fabricate carbon parts, but you find that many large scale companies assess them to be too risky from a cost, time and analysis (FE isn’t used as a stand alone analysis, there are loads of seperate tools for loads of seperate situations, at least within airbus) standpoint, so you usually end up with tape laying, and sheet forming operations, although it would seem that stringers can be roll formed.
coanda
ahh i think you mean the material manufacturers………:)