In essence America did attack Iraq without any just cause.
Standing in the rubble of 9/11, taking out a possible threat lead by a crazy that had unaccounted for military quality WMD makes perfect sense. Take no chances. Better that then risk a larger 9/11
How would America feel if for instance if a sovereign state like Kuwait was attacked and over run. There must be an appealing reason to breached the sanctuary of sovereign of a state.
Define sovereign. I hardly give that to a SH run Iraq. That was government was a combination sicilian crime family / stalinist state with possible WMD. RE: my first comment above.
In my humble view that can only be approved by a “world order” like the UN.
Good point. The U.N. could have helped out. Instead they were doing their super fine job of protecting terrorist countries and taking graft/payoff from the oil for food program. Way to go!. Based on our national defense, we aren’t going to go to the U.N. for a permission slip to take out a potential threat.
——- U.S. Senate Joint Resolution 23
Of equal legal significance, Senate Joint Resolution 23, which authorized the use of force in responding to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, authorizes the president:
“To use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.”
Sign In
