In English?
Any idea why the Spitfire and Hurricane failed to turn up?
I’ve not heard anything official, but crosswinds at CBY may have played up. Baby Spits and Hurricane are limited to 10kts X wind and big spits 15kts.
Hth
Here’s another one for you. There were more people in the stadium than in the RAF today. And there are more personnel in the Metropolitan police than in the Royal Navy. Food for thought….
Is there an ID for the remains, is it another battle of france survivor?
Same aircraft…
God bless the Panton family. Fred can revisit his brother Chris now. And I hope all the surviving members of the family get a little closer to them both in NX611 when the time is right.
In the end, well done for a largely succesful recovery – I just don’t want another Halifax, but maybe the engineer in me just hates seeing broken aeroplanes 🙂
I agree jag rigger. I know some will think its more replica than real if its restored/remanufactured, but I seem to think more people would prefer to see a complete aircraft than a total wreck, Mosquito KA114 springs straight to mind….
I’ve gotta agree with Fouga. And Moggy. I’ve seen it in the metal and John Marlin is clearly a talented chap. Short on eyesight though…
I don’t know about the aircraft specifically, but they wouldn’t have been ‘welded shut’. More likely is that the door actuators removed and replaced with fixed struts or retained and the system inhibited (locking collars fitted, bomb bay door handle guarded etc).
Hope that helps.
What plane is that?
I watched the Ch4 documentary about recreating the dams raid, where they built a dam in Canada and used a DC4 as the delivery aircraft.
On the show that showed post war trials with an A-26 Invader dropping a sphere at high speed. Heights of 30 feet were mentioned, and 350kts. I wonder what led the Americans to do these trials at such a low altitude.
For those that didnt see it, the sphere bounced once before taking the empennage off the aircraft causing it to pitch nose down, spars fail and then hit the water, killing the crew. Any more details?
So as most of the aircraft were used for trials and training after the raid, can one assume that the Upkeep specific modifications were removed? If so, to what level was this done? Was the mid upper turret fitted? Bomb doors? Do any images exist of the aircraft post raid?
True, but it still won’t make me like the man.
Anyone who promotes our heritage, and in particular our aviation heritage has my vote. You don’t need to like him, I doubt you even know him (apart from what you read in our venomous press).
Waddo, maybe its a bit late but why not get in touch with the RIAT crowd that managed to put together the centenary of aviation celebration? Maybe the airshow office weren’t aware of the 95th anniversary of the RAF…(I seem to remember the Spitfire 70th caught them out).
Niels, have they repainted it at all? Any pictures?
Its nice to see an open and honest report from a pilot caught out by an engineer’s thoughtless design. If only all pilot’s were so brave.
Aeronaut, you’re not an engineer are you? I doubt it was thoughtlessness that decided to give the aircraft a chassis up/down lever. Surely its down to the ability of the operator to ensure he has a good ‘handle’ on things??
Joking aside, its good to know that pilots make public mistakes as well as the so so many that get missed by most bystanders. We are all human after all…