757 landing field length:1494m
A320 landing field length:1442m747 landing field length:2072m
A340 landing field length:1855m
Is there something wrong with Boeing 😀 ?
Sorry couldnot resit
I’ve seen it a couple of times. Shocking, that’s the least you can say.
I thought you had seen it, seem like a movie you would “like”. The shocking fact for me was that this is based on a true experiment. Seemed like it the first time around but I just found out today that it was indeed based on a real experiment. I do believe that every person is capable of doing this in extreme circumstances. It is quite scary. In light of this movie how would you see the torture in Iraq? Extreme circumstances = extreme reaction?
Strange, TAROM uses the 737-700/800 series and now they are going to add our Mini busses. That doesn’ t look like a very efficient move. But I always enjoy the side of more Airbusses, so keep them coming.
I can’t beat this, smaller pictures then a point simply don’ t excist!
Just noticed, I joined this forum in december 1999. I think it was the summer f that year, but the forum has pushed trew the y2k mark 😀 .
You all must be glowing with the idea of Vipers being blown away. I think it would be quite a logical choice. The conversion should be less difficult to achieve because of all its electrical systems. Isn’t there away to strengthen the undercarriage. BTW How much stress can there be, I mean landing a F-16 with bombs on it must also be quite stressful. Aren’t the pilots not that skilful whom flying these birds?
Is a navigator or WSO a fully qualified pilot? If so then a navigator must have additional training after becomming current on an aircraft. I know in The Netherlands, in a AH-64 both of them are pilots and the senior one is not flying the aircraft. But in the case of tactical aircraft, like the Tornado, I don’ t think the navigator is a qualified pilot at all. But please correct me if I am wrong.
Budget cuts 🙁 . They will only have 72 Vipers left.
Jokes, jokes so many jokes 😎 .
Nice picture, thanks for that!
Re: G-force question
Originally posted by GDL
Near my place there is a new amusement ride called the ‘Vomitron’. It has a large arm that spins around and around, with two cages at each end of the arm for two passengers each. It is very much like a centrifuge that they use for pilot training.There is a lot of screaming when this thing runs, and it does indeed live up to it’s name and make people sick.
My question is this: What kind of g’s would you be pulling in this thing?
My estimates put the cages at the end of the spinning arm to be travelling at about 90km/h.
Is there a special formula for centrifuge g calculation?
About 4G I guess, everything above five is painfull and dangerous for John and Jane Do 😎 .
Originally posted by djnik
Great video Vympel!
Yes I concure, great video, thanks for that!
Thanks!
Originally posted by PhantomII
I guess I read you wrong then Dutchy.I thought by half you meant the “damn” part.
It’s quite well-known you’re not a fan of the F-4 so I figured you got bored and decided to mess with the thread.
If that wasnt the case then my apologies.
Apologies accepted, guess jokes can be taken the wrong way. I am not a Phantom-fan but this video was nice.
As I understand it
V1 is when you pull back on the stick
V2 is when you are airborne
Six to seven seconds I mean that is a long time. Why did it take that long, I mean if I was a pilot and the airplane didnot respond as predicted and I had the oppertunity I would stop instead of risking the people and the plane. So why did they act like they did? Could a professional shed some light on this subject.