Count me in for a seat for the day Andy and the bods from Wessex Arch have expressed interest as attending in the general audience.
Regards
Ross
The image is a good example of the effects of partial burial on survival.
I would suggest that the sea bed condition was 3/4 burial. If you look closely at the image you can see differences of surface from the exposed crankcase to the buried banks.
The best place is to compare the gear/wheel case casting.
Regards
Ross
The large ring in the last two photographs is part of the induction pipework connection between the supercharger discharge elbow and the central induction tube that runs the length of the engine between the banks.
The following photo is one of the cutaway Merlins at Cosford and shows the ring in the coupling housing.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224550[/ATTACH]
Regards
Ross
Clint,
By cut and paste “I’m unsure as to whether any of the following information is accurate” you are contributing to the problem of internet whispers without moving it to any factual conclusion.
Aircraft crashed on land and was removed.
“The three men in the rear of the aircraft were all wounded. The observer went back to attend to them but did not return. All the controls were damaged and the pilot and observer baled out.”
So five crew in all not just four names as in the cut and paste research.
AIR40/2398 gives the detail and names the pilot as Uffz Gerhard Schaffner.
The ES Water article that you quote makes it clear that EOD clearance dives took place post 1990 to deal with the mines that were sown to deter alighting.
So why then say “Quite whether there is still a Heinkel at the bottom of the reservoir I don’t know?”?
No He,111 in Abberton Res in 1940 and still no He.111 when subject to EOD clearance dives in the 1990s.
Ross
Over the years I’ve tried to get to the bottom of the “He111 in the Essex Reservoir” pub tale.
Each time it seems to stem from sloppy tales of the Abberton aircraft on 24th August 1940.
So I offer this to put this tale to bed.
Unless someone knows a different location….
Ross
Close to the Triang Go-Kart of the 70s – it was the rubber grips that triggered this memory from the depths.
http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Triang-ish3.png
Regards
Ross
Not used this machine but looking at the rollers below the bench it looks like one corner and two sides per roller.
The cold drawing one I had experience of back in the 80s took between 2 to 3 passes before the work hardened and had to be treated before the next 2 to 3 passes.
Usually the task was done in the first 2 to 3 passes.
Waste end of tube was belled and gripped by chain draw then 1st pass die (rectangular or square to suit) which had slightly oversize rounded corners and sides clamped round it (2 or 4 interlocking sections)
The tube was then pulled through the 1st die.
Next the tube was returned to start and die changed to finishing die of required section.
1 or 2 more passes to give final section form and polish.
Final action was to cut off drawing end to leave reduced section of required length.
Regards
Ross
Think of it as a combined English Wheel and slip forming rolls.
The handwheel on top puts manually incremented pressure on the tube to reduce the section. Each pass a twist reduces the gap slightly.
The gears allow the turns of the crank handle to draw the section through the rolls until the required length is cold formed.
Regards
Ross
Hi John,
Masselon was the name of one of the leading authorities on manufacturing of Celluloid and it’s derivatives.
Sounds like one of his processes for plastic label material.
Regards
Ross
Hi Gerry,
Form 1180 Accident Card, Copyright RAF Museum, Hendon
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224177[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]224178[/ATTACH]
Regards
Ross
L8722 crashed at 20:45 hrs on 8th when the floodlight was extinguished while they were landing due to the presence of enemy aircraft.
Pilot was P/O Duff.
Regards
Ross
Hi Jack,
P.12 compass – most 1950s transport/bombers and
D4 Links
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224083[/ATTACH]
Including a recent refit to Lindy see Blue2 photo from the thread
http://s819.photobucket.com/user/Blue2MGB/media/Victor%20Stuff/IMAG1078_zps12e1cc5d.jpg.html
Regards
Ross
I do not know the reasons for lack of press release.
However my personal view is that it was correct to stop association links of the organisations involved, eg Beermat’s question (not statement) which can be taken to imply that he has doubt it was lawful and WP840 off topic association with another project.
Have you not learned from other threads that corporate image is important to those that are involved and that speculation/association without proof is viewed as harmful by their PR.
Ross
Hawker Drawing D-733334 gives the tyre as 8″ – 10 1/4″ for Hurricane I, Hurricane II and Sea Hurricane but gives AH alternative above.
Regards
Ross
7.50 x 10 1/4 Dunlop tyres on some Hurricanes.
For size explanation see Type III on this link
http://www.wattsaviation.co.uk/products-and-services/tyre-sizes-explained.html
Regards
Ross