dark light

Ross_McNeill

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 826 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wellington II Z8525 #1004506
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    I’m not sure what you have researched already but this is the Raid Intell report for the nights operations.

    File is copyright TNA AIR14/3372

    It gives routes of the Ostende flights and details debrief observations from returning crews.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Wellington II Z8525 #1004597
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    The memorial at Runnymede is for those that have no known grave. This includes not only those never found but also those whose bodies were found and identified but where the grave could not be subsequently found i.e. a few men buried in Russian territory, those recovered but buried at sea etc.

    In this case it is that the bodies were not found at the time or during the post war searches on the continent.

    As the crew has been deceased for over 25 years you can get copies of their service records from the MoD at RAF Cranwell for a fee of £30 each regardless of NoK state.

    The RAF Service Record comes in a tabular form detailing units/dates/promotions/trade tests etc sufficient to track a service history but lacks any real detail on reason for death. Currently the time for delivery is between 6 and 9 months but is the only place where the service record can be obtained.

    There are some short cuts that can be made.
    If one of the crew was RAAF then the NAA will have a copy of his Service Record (A9301 file) and if killed in service his Casualty File (A705 file). In response to a internet request and payment of a small fee they will digitise the file and place it online for all to see. Time scale is approx. 3-4 weeks.

    In this case Bedwell 404165 has had his file digitised and is open to view.

    http://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/SearchScreens/BasicSearch.aspx

    Search as guest

    in the keywords box add

    Bedwell 404165

    Then hit search

    Click on the sheaf of pages icon on the A705 line for his casualty file.

    It will open in a new window. This file contains all the correspondence (internal and external) relating to his death. Page 20 has the letter from Driffield giving what was known about the final flight.

    After you have looked at his A705 file then take a look at his service record in a similar manner. An RAAF Service record contains extra information on the service man. This extra detail has been destroyed for RAF Service records and so is not available for those held at Cranwell.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Astro Navigation #1005218
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Quite correct Peter NP303/AP3270 are the Janet and John/Ladybird rapid sight reduction version for current use.

    Prior to that AP1618 ruled – varous volumes Lat 0 to 89 in 4 degree incremental volumes. (observer assumed at 5,000 ft)

    Air Almanac AP1602 also required!

    22 stars normal but 35 stars for Sun, Moon and planets for internal degrees of declination 0 to 28 degrees.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Astro Navigation #1005359
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Rumour had it that the Admiralty designed the three volumes to suit the mental ability of the RAF Navs

    i.e. full title was too much to remember but “use the red one then the yellow one” was just right for their ability.

    These are the current AP3279/NP303

    Red One – Volume 1 – Selected star epochs

    Green One – Volume 2 – 0 to 40 degrees Lat, Declination 0 to 29 deg

    Yellow One – Volume 3 – 40 to 89 degrees Lat, Declination 0 to 29 deg.

    Essentially the marine publications are the same as the air ones just the bias of horizon that alters.

    Aircraft ones are + or – x ft about 30,000 ft above horizon for the observers eye level, naval ones are sea level to about mast height <200ft.

    Regards
    Ross

    http://astro.ukho.gov.uk/nao/news/ap3270/

    in reply to: Astro Navigation #1005868
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Colour of cover banding.

    See Pomgo’s post #9
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?96171-Sight-Reduction-Tables

    Piccy of red tables
    http://img.zvab.com/member/79098k/37905198.jpg

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #1009576
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Foray is correct to say he sees severe corrosion but there is evidence to say that this does not extend all of the visible structure.

    The skin panels were at best 0.8mm thick when new. Only the wingtip area shows complete loss, similar thickness over the inner wing area shows only partial holes. Samples of panels were recovered and have been lab analysed to determine inter granular corrosion extent and best preservation protocols.

    What does bode well is that the bulk of the structure is standing proud of the seabed and supporting relatively heavy u/c components without supporting sand.

    The structure was strong enough to resist a nylon trawl net on the prop/engine boss without breaking away and being recovered to the harbour wall as in the picture by Grahame Knott. If everything was subject to severe corrosion it would have spread about the seabed when hit and not to have either ripped the trawl net, fastened the gear or broken the weak link.

    To survive a nylon trawl relatively intact and still stand proud of the seabed shows a degree of structural soundness.

    I see one of the two best states of structural preservation in a UK coastal aircraft wreck that I have witnessed or heard about.

    There are 80 odd pages demanding pictures of submerged spitfires in crates of muddy water and dissecting “Mr Blobby” geo physic plots. Now Bob Peacock has produced HD video for this discovery which matches the high res sonar image and it barely merits a passing mention. At least a few members of the forum are prepared to click links on something other than SPITFIRE! to look and express views on what is seen.

    Ross

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #1009763
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Put on your swim goggles, sit up straight in front of the computer screen, and watch the survey dive footage from 2011.

    Then post about what you see rather than what you suppose.

    http://youtu.be/0TC8JSXDrSM

    Bob Peacocks dive from 2011. The footage from 2009 is posted under Seadive

    Ross

    in reply to: Crash of Wellington 1c X9941 #1015881
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    So compensate for the forum upgrade “improvements” a repost of the Form 1180

    Pages copyright RAFM Hendon.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Mosquito HJ817 Crash 14 /10/1943. #934205
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Jenner was on an earlier course

    ORBs copyright TNA – AIR 29/684

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Mosquito HJ817 Crash 14 /10/1943. #934222
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Not finished yet.

    Course photo of Sgt Reah and named classmates.

    Sorry for the light flare – it was the best compromise in the circumstances.

    ORBs copyright TNA – AIR 29/684

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Mosquito HJ817 Crash 14 /10/1943. #934243
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Page from No.60 OTU ORB relating to the accident.

    ORBs copyright TNA – AIR 29/684

    in reply to: Mosquito HJ817 Crash 14 /10/1943. #934271
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]215594[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]215595[/ATTACH]

    Hi Ritch,

    I’ll sort the other thread out if this works.

    Can you see it now, mother?

    F1180 pages copyright RAF Museum

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Crash of Wellington 1c X9941 #934735
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    I can see them at my end but this might be due to cache rather than new page delivery.

    Lets try this

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=213533&d=1366093969

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=213534&d=1366093969

    Any joy?

    Ross

    in reply to: Crash of Wellington 1c X9941 #935350
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Now the page from the Unit Operations Record Book (ORB) held at The National Archives, Kew.

    Page copyright TNA – AIR 29/670

    Chorley’s volume on Bomber Command OTU losses should give the full crew list.

    Regards
    Ross

    in reply to: Crash of Wellington 1c X9941 #935361
    Ross_McNeill
    Participant

    Hi Ritch,

    The attached pages are the RAF Form 1180 (Flying Accicident – Not presumed due to enemy action) that are held by the AHB and RAF Museum.

    Pages copyright RAFM Hendon.

    Regards
    Ross

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 826 total)