dark light

SolarWarden

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 242 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2155667
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    More vid of its tight turning ability which experts say it can’t do.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2155708
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    I like the slow speed vertical takeoff.

    What a bunch of showoffs. Showing off the engines brute power.

    Marines better step up their game with their F-35’s this coming Miramar airshow. Dutch just one-upped us Yanks.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2155728
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Looks like the Dutch know how to have fun with their F-35’s.

    in reply to: CAP/Interception Weapons Load #2156245
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Thanks. I thought it might had to do with drag penalty but wasn’t too sure.

    in reply to: What will be the next country to order the F-35? #2167061
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    I think Belgium is going to be next and then Finland. Finland (Thanks to russia) has started inquiring about the F-35.

    Germany likely in the mid 2020’s and Greece is just flat out broke.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2167945
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    I just love how the anti-F-35 junta is in spin mode after the Denmark Decision. I swear Msphre and Don Bacon are the same fellas…. Maybe related? If Belgium and Finland select the F-35 we might have to put some of these anti-F35 folks on suicide watch. This has been a fun 24hrs seeing their discomfort. 😀

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168652
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    take your pills boy, a short range AAM and helmet mounted sight isnt game changing, everyone got it already

    It will be when AIM-9XII enters service. Lock after launch from an IR is game changing. Besides the current 9x has a 90degree off-boresight.

    The “old” 9x is a beast.

    Can’t spoof the 9x seeker unlike the R-73. Wonder why the Russians haven’t put out a video of their R-73 hitting targets with a HOBS?

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168784
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Flash news
    Denmark appears to have selected the F35,officially to replace their aging F16. Number is 27 airframes, 3 less than current number of F16.
    Boeing marketing campaign ,on local radio ,actually hard rock one, to place the SH, did not seem to have succeeded.No surprise there if you ask me.

    Lol. This should make some of the anti F-35 folks in here nuts. F-35 death spiral is still certain.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169100
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    I don’t know if this video has been posted but this was a pretty good video of General Bogdan updating us on the F-35.

    Video is a couple of months old and @ the 25:00 mark he actually answers some of the claims from the online anti-F-35 crowd.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2172311
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    4/29/2016 – EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. — A U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey descended on Edwards to link up with a Marine F-35B Joint Strike Fighter April 28.
    http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii120/Duggy009/a%20and%20a%20two/MV-22B%20Osprey%20%20descended%20on%20Edwards%20to%20link%20up%20with%20a%20Marine%20F-35B%20Joint%20Strike%20Fighter%20April%2028..jpg
    Both aircraft are assigned to Marine Operational Test & Evaluation Squadron 22 (VMX-22) out of Marine Corps Air Station Yuma in Arizona.

    VMX-22 has a detachment here where Marines are testing and evaluating their version of the JSF, which is the short take-off and vertical landing variant.

    The Osprey dropped by for a quick but important test.

    “The test was to validate ground refueling from an MV-22 to an F-35B, which is integral to the construct of the Marine Air Ground Task Force,” said USMC Maj. Adam Geitner, pilot and VMX-22 F-35 Detachment Aircraft Maintenance officer.

    The Marine Air-Ground Task Force is the organizational foundation for all missions across the range of USMC military operations. MAGTFs are a balanced air-ground, combined arms task organization of Marine Corps forces under a single commander that is structured to accomplish a specific mission.

    “This was the first time an MV-22 has refueled an F-35. Both ground refueling and air-to-air refueling are important pieces to the Marine Corps’ MAGTF operational construct. From a tactical point of view, the MV-22 to F-35 ground refueling allows the Marine Corps to employ assets in austere environments on a short notice without having to rely on long-term planning and fixed facilities,” Geitner said.

    The one-hour test consisted of hooking up fuel transfer lines between the two aircraft with the MV-22 fueling up the F-35B. The test validated the equipment and procedures on both the F-35B and MV-22.
    http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii120/Duggy009/a%20and%20a%20two/MV-22B%20Osprey%20%20descended%20on%20Edwards%20to%20link%20up%20with%20a%20Marine%20F-35B%20Joint%20Strike%20Fighter%20April%2028.-2.jpg
    Geitner said the MV-22 Osprey has the ability to carry approximately 10,000 lbs. of fuel in its fuel containers loaded in the back of the aircraft. This is coupled with approximately 12,000 lbs. carried internally, which can either provide fuel to its own aircraft or to external aircraft in air-to-air refueling operations.

    Fuel was successfully transferred to the F-35, which taxied off back to the Joint Operation Test Team area.
    http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii120/Duggy009/a%20and%20a%20two/MV-22B%20Osprey%20%20descended%20on%20Edwards%20to%20link%20up%20with%20a%20Marine%20F-35B%20Joint%20Strike%20Fighter%20April%2028.-1.jpg
    “The next step will be air-to-air refueling from an MV-22. This is even more significant for the MAGTF when operating F-35s from [amphibious assault ships] because it provides organic air-to-air refueling capability that vastly extends the range of the aircraft and also provides operational flexibility,” said Geitner.

    Previously, Marine AV-8B Harrier aircraft would require USMC KC-130s to provide air-to-air refueling capabilities. However, they are limited to land and when the amphibious assault ships are operating in either blue water operations, or in regions that deny them access to land-based air facilities, as it limits air-to-air refueling capabilities, Geitner added.

    “With the MV-22 being on the ship, co-located with the F-35, all of those constraints with the KC-130 no longer apply.”

    The MV-22B Osprey is a tiltrotor vertical and/or short take-off and landing aircraft that serves as the medium-lift assault support aircraft for the Marines. The Osprey can operate as a helicopter or a turboprop aircraft. It can transport troops, equipment and supplies from ships and land bases for combat assault and support.

    Edwards AFB hasn’t seen an Osprey in the skies regularly since 2007. That’s the year the 418th Flight Test Squadron said goodbye to the CV-22 Integrated Test Team after completing developmental test of the aircraft.
    (U.S. Air Force photo’s by Christian Turner)
    http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii120/Duggy009/a%20and%20a%20two/MV-22B%20Osprey%20%20descended%20on%20Edwards%20to%20link%20up%20with%20a%20Marine%20F-35B%20Joint%20Strike%20Fighter%20April%2028.-3.jpg

    Ahh the V-22. A program that was over budget and years behind schedule. It also had a few fatal crashes but DOD stuck with it and now the Marines love it and can’t can’t get enough of them. I see the F-35 program somewhat similar but without the fatalities. Once done nations that fly the F-35 will love it.

    in reply to: Scarbourgh Shoal puts Chinese planes too close #2172689
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    China is a nuclear super power and even US will not dare to touch Chinese islands. They will bark, but that is all.

    After the UN rules against china they will no longer be chinese islands. They will be an illegal occupation from a bully nation and the Philippines can take any action it wants to remove the chinese. They’ll likely ask the US and surrounding nations for help.

    in reply to: Scarbourgh Shoal puts Chinese planes too close #2172936
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    How would you propose to stop them? :eagerness:

    After the UN rules against china the Philippines will be within their right to take action… Likely with US help.

    One way is to blockade any chinese vessel from entering the shoal. Then lets see what the chinese do. It will be china that will be the aggressor on this one.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2181657
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    I am sure pretty much everyone here did…

    F-35B’s was the only logical answer…. unless they are adding a sky ramp on their runway? 😀

    in reply to: Mig-31's Top Speed With Weapons Load #2184907
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Only if you understand Russian. Bondarev’s speech is starting at 53:10. Words about real MIG-31 speed at 58:33. Actually, he’s talking about many problems of MIG-31 – glass is just one of them.

    P.S. Bondarev is a real man. Not every high-ranking officer or government’s official could say so honestly about real problems in our country and army. Most of them are like that clown Rogozin.

    Thank you, sir.

    in reply to: Mig-31's Top Speed With Weapons Load #2185107
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    According to statement of the current head of RuAF Bondarev that he made at paliament hearings about further MIG-31 fate in April 2013, currently, speed of MIG-31 is limited to Mach 1,5 due to age and state of its canopy glass.

    Can you please post a source? Not saying i don’t believe you.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 242 total)