dark light

Primate

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 679 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Turkish F-4 down #2292028
    Primate
    Participant

    An article/presentation by SOC:

    http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Syria-SAM-Deployment.html

    Perhaps a bit more reliable, depending on any recent changes.

    in reply to: Turkish F-4 down #2292031
    Primate
    Participant

    How reliable is that source?

    in reply to: Turkish F-4 down #2292110
    Primate
    Participant

    They shot down an F4 an antiquated plane. If the west gets involved they will destroy Syrian air defenses using Tomahawks first then the Rafale/Stike Eagles will do the rest. I give max two weeks before Syrian defenses are wiped out. Then its Libya all over again.

    I think NATO begs to differ.

    A little dated, but still relevant:

    http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/29/nato_chief_intervention_just_won_t_work_in_syria

    in reply to: Turkish F-4 down #2292151
    Primate
    Participant

    Other countries normally don’t do such things.

    Don’t know how often, but it happens. Pilot error due to loss of situational awareness, perhaps ATC error. Not sure about the Turkish President’s statements, though.

    I know that, if I was in a country on the receiving end of a mass refugee arrival, I would want my government to find out what’s going on.
    I also know that I’d send a single jet on a photo mission – if I was planning anything more… adventurous I’d send at least one or two escorts with the recon bird, I certainly wouldn’t send an RF4 on its own…

    It would most likely be regarded as an incursion nonetheless.

    I know too little about this case and don’t feel fit to pass any judgement right now, but it seems that a more common way to deal with such situations is to scramble interceptors and take it from there. Engagement without prior warning (?) is a bit special, I think. The Syrian government seems to think this is in line with prevailing laws, something which makes me wonder. Then again, expecting the Syrians to make sense in this case might be expecting too much.

    I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

    in reply to: A bit of fun #403041
    Primate
    Participant

    You’re not surprised, are you?

    in reply to: Getting used to g-forces (light aircraft) #403043
    Primate
    Participant

    I’m sure! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Good memories. Nice controls and stability properties among other things, if I remember correctly. A nice change for me after spending some time in the Cirrus SR20.

    in reply to: Syrian air force defection #2292368
    Primate
    Participant

    If this is a civil war, I’m not sure how it differs from Libya and Egypt…those were basically civil wars as well.

    I believe NATO and several governments have pointed out again and again that the situation in Syria is more complex than things were in Libya in the spring of 2011. An intervention entails a risk of making things worse, and that includes the surrounding region. From what I’ve heard so far, at least.

    in reply to: Syrian air force defection #2292523
    Primate
    Participant

    Situation in Syria is a little bit more complicated than “evil dictator against his own people” or “bad guys against good guys”.
    It’s just a civil war.
    (…)

    So, please, have a stop with nice stories of bad buys against good guys, reality is not an Hollywood tv show.

    I guess this may be part of the reason why NATO seems rather reluctant about a military intervention at this time.

    in reply to: Getting used to g-forces (light aircraft) #403048
    Primate
    Participant

    My first intro was being told we will pull some see how you feel, if ok we will do some more, we went off straight and level gentle turn out to sea then pulled 6 plus into the vertical, he then said ok? That was my intro lol 6g… He figured pull a load and if i am ok then he need not worry..

    Pretty hefty for an intro ride, if you ask me. ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Russian arms sales to Syria #1792407
    Primate
    Participant

    Not sure if I understand. Are you questioning the military capabilities of Arab countries in general rather than the quality of Russian hardware in itself?

    in reply to: Syrian air force defection #2292592
    Primate
    Participant

    Does anyone have any details regarding the use of Syrian air power in this crisis? All I know is that the media reports about “bombing,” “bombardment” etc. quite often without saying much about any air or ground forces involved. I can’t remember having seen anything about the Syrian air force in all this until this story came along.

    How is leaving a country (specifically a government) who is murdering its own people spineless? Did the two Libyan pilots who flew to Malta last year also fit your definition of spineless?

    x2

    in reply to: Getting used to g-forces (light aircraft) #403060
    Primate
    Participant

    Fully agree with Moggy. You’ll get used to it and probably learn to enjoy it. ๐Ÿ™‚

    The Bulldog is a nice plane for airwork, in my opinion. You have lots of fun to look forward to.

    Good luck and give it your best.

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled-(Trafikflyg-Hรถgskolan/Scottish-Aviation-Bulldog/0769146/L/&sid=42b9bb404b565eab2d52adb3ded9942f

    in reply to: Russian arms sales to Syria #1792505
    Primate
    Participant

    Mobile air defence cells are the way to go. Making use of a wide-area aerospace defence compex like the S-300 is probably beyond Syria’s capability anyway.

    A different perspective from what I’m used to (politically speaking), but OK.

    I’ll take it as a “keep your enemies closer” thing. ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Russian arms sales to Syria #1792509
    Primate
    Participant

    Due to a number of reasons I don’t think you should get your hopes up about that F-22, but let’s not ruin this thread with stuff like that. The forum is saturated with it already.

    in reply to: General Discussion #255624
    Primate
    Participant

    As Kev35 says there seems to be less of a sense of community and tolerance on here than there was when I first joined, and more people seem to take offence more quickly, or seem unable to accept that other members may have views and opinions that differ from theirs, and that others are fully entiled to hold those different views, ….but that seems to reflect modern society (unfortunately).

    The gentle self-mocking humour generally seems to be less obvious, and many “younger” users seem more earnest, less “chilled”, and less able to see the difference between good natured “banter” and a truly barbed comment – again this seems (IMHO) to reflect modern society?

    I remember how I could be a little sensitive and a little short in the wit department some years back. I guess things such as life experience, development of self-insight and social competence play a big part. Some of the younger members might have a way to go.

    At times I find the inability of newer members to use the forum “search” function, or to have used web-based search engines, a little frustrating, particularly when a simple search would probably have saved them incurring the wrath of older members who may well have seen the same question asked more than once before.

    A familiar issue in multiple forums, I think.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 679 total)