dark light

Primate

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 679 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tom Daley has come out. #1843725
    Primate
    Participant

    I quite like diving. I used to do an awful lot when I was living in Northern Ireland at a place called Muff.

    Guess you won the Internet today. :highly_amused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #241096
    Primate
    Participant

    Ok, my time to come out, I believe I’m a raving Lesbian, because when I see an image of a pair of young ladies from the isle of Lesbos, I have this major urge to join in :p

    In that case I think a fair amount of us are strongly inclined in that direction. =)

    Tom does come across as effeminate, but using that to judge his (perceived) sexuality is in itself homophobic.

    We humans often have (changeable) mental models / schemes with categories that help us perceive and manage our experience of the world, often in a simplified manner. I guess I have a tendency to connect overly effeminate behaviour in other men with possible homosexuality, although I don’t think it’s always the case. I’ve been wrong a few times. I don’t really care either. Am I being a bit prejudiced? Possibly. But as long as my prejudices don’t cause any problems they don’t really bother me much. It’s there in the corner of my mind, but I don’t act on it. Not consciously. Don’t take this the wrong way. I took some classes in social- and personality psychology some years back. IIRC, some implicit (?) prejudice is quite normal. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t work to contain and change bad prejudice. I’m just saying that it’s quite human, as I understand it. I respect your opinion, but I don’t view this directly as homophobic.

    in reply to: Tom Daley has come out. #1843982
    Primate
    Participant

    Ok, my time to come out, I believe I’m a raving Lesbian, because when I see an image of a pair of young ladies from the isle of Lesbos, I have this major urge to join in :p

    In that case I think a fair amount of us are strongly inclined in that direction. =)

    Tom does come across as effeminate, but using that to judge his (perceived) sexuality is in itself homophobic.

    We humans often have (changeable) mental models / schemes with categories that help us perceive and manage our experience of the world, often in a simplified manner. I guess I have a tendency to connect overly effeminate behaviour in other men with possible homosexuality, although I don’t think it’s always the case. I’ve been wrong a few times. I don’t really care either. Am I being a bit prejudiced? Possibly. But as long as my prejudices don’t cause any problems they don’t really bother me much. It’s there in the corner of my mind, but I don’t act on it. Not consciously. Don’t take this the wrong way. I took some classes in social- and personality psychology some years back. IIRC, some implicit (?) prejudice is quite normal. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t work to contain and change bad prejudice. I’m just saying that it’s quite human, as I understand it. I respect your opinion, but I don’t view this directly as homophobic.

    in reply to: General Discussion #241122
    Primate
    Participant

    Thank you.

    in reply to: Rest Easy "babe" #1844057
    Primate
    Participant

    Thank you.

    in reply to: General Discussion #241277
    Primate
    Participant

    A waffer thin mint?

    If he accepts it this time you’ll clean up.

    in reply to: Monty Python reuniting! #1844185
    Primate
    Participant

    A waffer thin mint?

    If he accepts it this time you’ll clean up.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2242779
    Primate
    Participant

    No comment :

    http://i43.tinypic.com/2a8ruiu.jpg

    Happens all the time. :rolleyes:

    Could be an excellent PAPI substitute at grass fields, e.g.:

    Too high: Breasts only.

    Too low: Lower body only.

    On glidepath: Full frontal.

    in reply to: Did the Luftwaffe make the right choice with the F-104? #2258547
    Primate
    Participant

    That claims have to be red with some knowledge. That exercise was conducted to rise confidence of the pilots into their own weapon-system at first. In a realistic situation the Italian F-104S with their Aspide AAMs had made use of their higher speed and height envelope for a BVR engagement. The small number of Serbian MiG-29s with questional combat readiness were no real threat in an AWACS controlled sky.
    Just at low level and lower speeds a MiG-21 is superior in terms of manoeuvrability to a F-104.

    The book states that the Italian F-104s carried the AIM-9G only and that the MiG-21s in question would probably carry the AA-2 and -8. Using the all-aspect AIM-9M against an adversary with rear-aspect missiles was part of the deal here, as I understand it.

    As I interpret the book, Serb MiG-29s were considered to be a potential threat at the time, especially against the Sea Harrier with its limited air-to-air capability. If you’ve read the book you should know that the Bosnian NFZ could be messy at times. Other accounts I’ve read from Deny Flight also suggest that. Also, some of the Luftwaffe MiG pilots which Richardson and the others flew against seemed to think that the Serbs knew their stuff. Remember that this was in 1994.

    I didn’t come here to bash / criticize the F-104, but to provide some input based on accounts from a few pilots with relevant experience. I feel this forum could use some of that.

    in reply to: Did the Luftwaffe make the right choice with the F-104? #2258965
    Primate
    Participant

    The performance of the F-104 was significant then and now, at least in the climb and go fast in a straight line department. That was a very accepted strategy in the days of the Cold War.

    I recall reading about a DACT exercise between RN Sea Harriers and Italian F-104s in 1994 in the book No Escape Zone by Nick Richardson. The Sea Harriers were on their way to deploy with the HMS Ark Royal in support of Deny Flight over Bosnia and made a stop at Decimomannu AB, Sardinia for some training. Apparently the F-104s were meant to pose as MiG-21s, even though the MiG is superior in terms of manoeuvrability. One of their tactics was to “steam into the merge” at high altitude and speed. The Sea Harriers (armed with AIM-9M) defeated them using trail formation (with number two stacking up high behind the leader) and battle-to-hook. Not too much trouble, apparently. Things didn’t work out as well against Luftwaffe MiG-29s, though. Back then they were worried that the Serbs might try to challenge NATO using MiG-29s.

    in reply to: Did the Luftwaffe make the right choice with the F-104? #2259192
    Primate
    Participant

    Had to stay above 200 KIAS or something during base turn, according to a former F-104 pilot I met years ago. IIRC.

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2259250
    Primate
    Participant

    Special Japanese decoration for OH-1 and AH-1

    Weird.

    Marines MH-46 : strange shadows as camouflage

    Great 😎

    in reply to: General Discussion #261135
    Primate
    Participant

    Recently finished “No Escape Zone” by Nick Richardson. Well written and a very interesting read. Pick it up if you’re interested in Richardson’s story, Sea Harriers, the Bosnian War and Deny Flight, life aboard the HMS Ark Royal etc.

    Anyone know what became of the author? Has he been back to Bosnia?

    in reply to: What Book Are You Reading? #1862035
    Primate
    Participant

    Recently finished “No Escape Zone” by Nick Richardson. Well written and a very interesting read. Pick it up if you’re interested in Richardson’s story, Sea Harriers, the Bosnian War and Deny Flight, life aboard the HMS Ark Royal etc.

    Anyone know what became of the author? Has he been back to Bosnia?

    in reply to: General Discussion #262365
    Primate
    Participant

    but world wide we must look at population growth and somehow slow or halt the rise, how to do this is the real question (…)

    I don’t see anyone proposing anything on those lines anytime soon

    I haven’t looked very closely at the issue, but AFAIK, poverty has a role in this.

    All we will get, will be another round of initiatives and green projects all designed to extract even more money from the people and into the pockets of financiers and assorted fat cats, yet so many green campaigners wonder why there is so much cynicism regarding the whole issue.

    For all I know at this time you might have a point here, but I also suspect that some of the cynicism as you put it stems from feelings of helplessness and a prospect of reduced standards of living, for instance.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 679 total)