dark light

LesB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 681 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MAM's HS125 – Hydraulic Demonstrator #1325659
    LesB
    Participant

    . . . and finally

    Now that the finishing touches are being put to the 125 it can be revealed that the main purpose behind this project and the reason the work was carried out so unstintingly under difficult and daunting prevailing conditions of cold, damp, windiness, etc (and that’s just the Chf Eng! :rolleyes:). They were secretly making a hide-away – a bar!

    http://www.canberra.plus.com/pics/key/125-bar.jpg

    So, if you can’t find a guide at MAM this year when you visit, knock on the door of the HS125 Hydraulic Demonstrator.

    😉

    in reply to: CockpitFest 2007 #1245820
    LesB
    Participant

    Yup.. Just to stop LesB moaning about a lack of Cranberries again..!

    Such a delight it’ll be to see it too. It’s the utmost best PR.9 cockpit owned by anybody called Ross I’ve ever seen!!

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Wind damage? #1246360
    LesB
    Participant

    GAM’s Canberra was picked up last night and dumped on its back side, all 10 odd tons of it! despite being chocked and pegged down at the front. There doesn’t appear to be any damage at first glance. We wont know until the old girl is put back down on all wheels, and the back end can be examined, at present her nose is pointing skyward.

    The ability to sit down on its haunches is an endearing trait of the Canberra, :rolleyes: has been for years. Solution is a tail trestle as on MAM’s WF922 – any CanMan will tell you that. The moments and surface areas involved will still pick up a concrete block though.

    There’s little likelihood of major damage unless it bounced around a lot. Some skin wrinkling, maybe back-hatch fit probs, but nothing that can’t be fettled.

    Seen it. Been there. Sorted it . . . 😉 😉

    in reply to: Are these 'stock' images used by the RAF? #1250279
    LesB
    Participant

    Being printed on card as you say (or maybe mounted on card), I consider these photos would have been meant to be pinned up on a display board at some exhibition or presentation or the like – not necessarily public. Also, there looks to be pinholes in he corners of some of them.

    .

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1251770
    LesB
    Participant

    4 Hunters and a C130

    That would be two Hunters, two Jaguars and a C-130. at Thumriat.

    There’s another clip of this ‘passing out’ formation flypast when they came back and flew between the radio masts.

    😎

    in reply to: Short Belfast #1251877
    LesB
    Participant

    Main reason though was because they were just too slow with any load on board.

    The Belfs used to stage through RAF Gan when I was out there. Recall one time a westbound Belf took off for the UK routed via Muharraq, Cyprus to BZ. About 3/4 hr later a westbound Herc left on the same route. Herc made it to Muharraq before the Belf and, we were told, was en-route to BZ over France while the Belf was just landing at Akrotiri. They were just too slow.

    .

    in reply to: Any rumours for Legends 2007? #1252302
    LesB
    Participant

    Will there be a bouncy castle?

    Not in the flying display . . . unless it’s very windy.

    .

    in reply to: Some advice on my Canon 350D? #457960
    LesB
    Participant

    Hi Mania
    Global has the best idea, it’s what I did when I first got my 300D a couple of years back. Take many pics of the same subject, say your back garden or street scene or similar. Take all pix from the same viewpoint but with a different setting for each.

    I set up on a tripod in the garden and tried pics at all the various white balance modes first. Then different ISOs, Then different shoot modes – P, TV, AV, etc. All with each lens in turn. Took it off tripod tried the same series but hand-held (to check my built-in camera shake tolerence).

    Took camera indoors. Another series using the flash (built-in) and then Canon attachable flash-gun. Tried all the settings with all my lenses, etc. As with Global, took notes and compared later on-screen. Got to know what the kit would do at different settings with different lenses then, out onto a road. Stacks of images of cars going past to see how my panning was and what shutter speed/aperture combi worked best for me. Then down to East Midlands Airport to run a series on aircraft – all lenses, all settings – took notes.

    All this took time, about a week or so (I’m retired), but the exercise gave me an appreciation of what the camera would do in my hands. After that it was just application of that knowledge, modifying it as needed and in light of later results. But at least I knew what I was modifying and why!

    You can’t really just use settings that others use, you really have to work out what you can do with your kit. No good trying to run before you can walk.

    🙂

    in reply to: MAM's Work in Progress #1263327
    LesB
    Participant

    This is great. I would like to bring our first year Aeronautical Engineering students up to see you en masse next year, so that they can get some sort of “hands on” of real aeroplanes. What do you think?

    This is exactly why MAM are making it usable again.

    Although personally I’m not part of MAM, I’m sure the blokes there will be more than pleased to accomodate you and the studes. Methinks it would make an excellent field trip and day out, with (possibly) even cockpit visits. MAM of course is also home to an extensive archive (with exhibits) of Fank Whittle’s work and times.

    Probably best to pre-arrange with a phone call or an e-mail to ensure best attention on the day.

    .

    in reply to: Atmospheric Midland Air Museum…… #1263486
    LesB
    Participant

    Really like these Rob, great images, very moody and atmospheric.

    Good one squire.

    in reply to: I'm pleased to announce…. #1263496
    LesB
    Participant

    Outstanding. Best non-jet show I’ve ever been to.

    See if you can arrange for dry grass next time please, my scooty thing got seriously bogged down this year. 😉 😉

    .

    in reply to: Is it or isnt a PR9 Yoke? #1269149
    LesB
    Participant

    The BI 8’s primary role was to deliver bombs but a gun pack was fitted in the bomb bay for ground attack purposes hence the flip down trigger

    http://www.classicaircraft.co.uk/canberra_2.htm

    This tells you a bit about it, I have compared the one on ebay with the one on the complete column I have and it is absolutely identical in every respect, even down to the number, except mine is somewhat scruffier:mad:

    The B(I)8 also had a tactical nuclear role which was considered ‘primary’.

    Regarding the link given by JunkC. This leads to an essay by Bill Yates, a 14 Sqn Navigator on 8s. His essay is readable but wrong in certain aspects. Firstly, his mention of ‘three’ sqns disregarding No 3 Sqn at Geilenkirchen (ironically just a few miles down the road from Wildenrath). These were the ‘Strike Sqns’ – 3 Sqn (Geilenkirchen), 14 Sqn (Wildentrath), 16 Sqn (Laarbruch) and 213 Sqn (B(I)6s at Bruggen).

    His main error though is his description of the gun-pack fitting. The gun-pack was not fitted at the front of the bomb bay, ’twas at the rear of both B(I)8 and B(I)6 Canberras. A couple of years back I mailed the site about the above to no avail as it could lead people astray (especially modellers).

    If you like to see B(I)8s, go here to my B(I)8 Galleries. I’m trying to get a pic of every B(I)8 produced. Have 45 out of 83 already.

    On to FMk6John’s post.
    A 1992 date for recon of a grip that went out of RAF service twenty years previously? Mmmm . . .I went, and again – Mmm. . . Could it be that the grip is for/from an foreign owned Canberra? This is now a definite possible since India and Peru still have active 8s. Didn’t actually think of JohnnyForeigner back up the thread, but it now seems a more apt explantion.

    .

    in reply to: Is it or isnt a PR9 Yoke? #1269354
    LesB
    Participant

    Just a thought Les, didnt some of the B(I) 8’s get fitted with a gun pack just forward of the bomb bay? Bex

    No. Bomb bay is much longer the non-PR Canberras. PRs has a short flare bay and with a fuel tank where the front half should’ve been, and then a front camera bay as well.

    Although . . . the Rhodesians fitted a 4-rail rocket launcher in front of the nose wheel on their Canberras. This was not an officially sanctioned mod by EE who washed their hands off the Rhodesians.

    .

    in reply to: Is it or isnt a PR9 Yoke? #1269930
    LesB
    Participant

    Backing off here . . .

    OK. There seems to be a consensus that the grip is for a B(I)8 (or B(I)6) so I’ll have to go with that I guess. Still a wee bit of doubt in my mind though as, although it seems to fit the bill I personally don’t recall the grip-trigger housed on the front of the horn. Can’t think of what that would have been for.

    Thing that I hesitated over was the large box-like housing just below the head, don’t recall any such thing but then memory plays strange tricks – I mean, this time last week I could’ve sworn it was Friday! But, I’ve now pretty much convinced myself (with your help) that this really is the housing for the flap-covered elevator trim switch. Then on top, the R/T button, trigger release safety flap and safety-guarded pylon bombs/RP release button. But the grip trigger . . . ? Possibly it’s a mod that came in after I left the 8s. And I’ve no pics showing it or information about it, not even in the B(I)8 Pilots’ Notes.

    So, as the whole subject sinks slowly into the sunset with four-part harmony and in living colour, I shall wander off muttering . . . that way ——>

    😉

    in reply to: Is it or isnt a PR9 Yoke? #1270680
    LesB
    Participant

    Bump.

    Nobody going to refute any of my info then? As I wrote in my post (#25), I’ve only got a high level of confidence in my statements not absolute certainty.

    Notice the guy on e-bay selling this supposedly Canberra hand-grip has now mentioned this thread as an authority and is claiming some people in this forum as having confirmed it’s a B(I)8 grip.

    Not sure I’m comfortable with this in this instance.

    I would appreciate it if someone out there with the means could look up the Part No he gives – AC14292 – and find out if it is a Canberra part, specifically a B(I)8 part (or B(I)6 part). If it is, then I’ll gladly back down. But if not, it’s blantant misrepresentation and needs sorting.

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 681 total)