dark light

LesB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 681 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Caption? #1298423
    LesB
    Participant

    “OK John, take the picture now. This’ll have all those aviation forum guys on the internet making up captions for the rest of their natural!”

    😎

    in reply to: Nimrod Down #1310905
    LesB
    Participant

    Sadsack
    Lighten up.

    goof
    Don’t need to go to any web site, I was on 51Sqn in the days when we had a real enemy.

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: A Meteor flying today? #1310916
    LesB
    Participant

    Alan
    Sounds about right, thanks for that gen.

    Damien
    Agreed. In fact that’s what I thought. My correspondent said “. . . a twin-jet aircraft with mid-wing engines.” Later he got onto my site to check his notion that it was a Canberra – he was on his allotment when he saw it. But, just in case, I had to ask here about a meatbox as I’m not familiar with 163’s program.

    Aside . . .
    Can’t think of any other twin, wing-mounted jet engined straight winged aircraft that would fit the bill except the cranberry and the meatbox. Are there any? Any that would be flying in the UK that is.

    Propstrike
    Thanks for that gen. But I don’t think the M40 runs anywhere near Stone in Staffordshire. 😉

    Thanks for that people, makes me look good . . . again. :rolleyes:

    .

    in reply to: Nimrod Down #1311322
    LesB
    Participant

    An r1 from Waddington would make sense.

    I’d love to be filled in on this.

    Keep on mentioning Waddo’s Secret Squirels and you will be . . . by serious men in black Vauxhall Omegas.

    😎

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 discussion thread #1316495
    LesB
    Participant

    Never seen a Vulcan flying in the flesh, . . .

    Despite the delightful image that conjours up, I think you’d be better advised to wear at least some sort of clothing.

    :diablo: :diablo:

    .

    in reply to: RAF Kemble Dig – Any News? #1259767
    LesB
    Participant

    You’re probably thinking of the ‘dig’ to be done at Kenley Airfield.

    From another forum . . .

    Buried treasure at Kenley Airfield?

    ROYAL Air Force engineers are set to dig up Kenley Airfield as part of a secret mission to uncover its wartime past.

    The project has been kept under wraps because bosses fear a swathe of metal detector-wielding plane enthusiasts will move in before them.
    Archaeologists from the Ministry of Defence Fire Training School, in Manston, Kent, will help excavate a patch of the historic site believed to be an old aircraft dump.

    Starting on August 7, it is hoped the dig will solve the 50-year-old mystery of what lies beneath the former RAF base. Bomb disposal teams have carried out a subterranean survey of the World War Two site in preparation for the excavation.

    It is thought that legendary aeroplanes such as Spitfires and Hawker Hurricanes, the two fighters that won the Battle of Britain, are buried there.
    It is also rumoured that an old Avro Lincoln bomber – a high-altitude four-engined plane not used in the war – was left at the site…..

    Chris Baguley,chairman of the Friends of Kenley Airfield, said: “Who knows what’s in there. They’re going to be digging up old scrap buried a long time ago.

    “It could be bits of an old tip or it could be something tangible. Maybe even an important piece of military history.”

    “The RAF wants to dispel all the myths about what is down there by finding out about the planes.What happened then we don’t know and it will be very interesting to find out.”

    Squadron leader Keith Chandler, of the 615 Volunteer Gliding Squadron, said: “In the 1950s the RAF used a number of out-of-service fighter planes there, including Spitfires and Hurricanes, for fire training. “In the early 80s one of them surfaced and was taken away but the rest have been buried there for years. I think the RAF wants to keep it quiet, though, because the last thing they want is a legion of people with metal detectors digging up the land before they get there.”

    Wing Commander David Lainchbury, the commandant at the fire training school, said …….”The site survey revealed three or four large, unusual shapes which may be aircraft fuselage. Earth-moving equipment will be used initially in the excavation, while air training corps members will then be involved in the hand-dig. “It would then be up to the Corporation of London, which owns the land, to determine what to do with any interesting findings.”

    http://iccroydon.icnetwork.co.uk/news/croydon

    But see here

    .

    in reply to: scare tactics…. #1263879
    LesB
    Participant

    i suppose you could call the frequent Soviet flights near NATO airspace during the cold war a type of scare tactic. this in turn gave NATO airforces a need for QRAs.

    Afraid you’ve got that wrong. QRA was instituted to enable crews (air and ground) to get training in and become proficient at Uckers or the board game Risk. The duty was also used as a very efficient method of disposing of obscenely large quanities of German eggs in the form of huge omlettes.

    😉

    in reply to: "Enjoy". Aaaarghh! #454061
    LesB
    Participant

    But what if someone isn’t looking for comments, but is just posting the photos for other people’s enjoyment?

    Then there’s no point in saying anything is there?

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Canberra Specs #1268724
    LesB
    Participant

    Mark

    These are some of the pics from when they picked-up WF922. I use them on my Canberra web site – Survivors page for 922 – courtesy of MAM’s archive.

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/922/pickup-1.jpg

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/922/pickup-2.jpg

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/922/pickup-3.jpg

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/922/del-1.jpg

    Hope these may help in some way. Maybe Jag has pics of the wings mounted on a truck.

    .

    in reply to: Heads up "Strategic Air Command" BBC2 Sunday #1280501
    LesB
    Participant

    On the same beach as a Ford V8 Pilot? :rolleyes: Famous pic that Albert. 😉

    .

    in reply to: Wildenrath 1955-1965 #1280512
    LesB
    Participant

    There’s a few here who were in 2TAF in Germany David. I was just down the road at Geilenkirchen at that time on 3 Sqn – Canberra B(I)8s. Your dad (on 17Sqn) was a PR Canberra man, ground or air?

    in reply to: Heads up "Strategic Air Command" BBC2 Sunday #1280521
    LesB
    Participant

    Big question, can I claim to be the only person on the Forum who has seen a B-36 in flight,

    Another here who’s seen the B.36s in flight.

    Was brought up in Campbeltown (Argyll) in Scotland. Nearby aerodrome was (and is) Machrihanish. In the mid 50s there were fairly regular overflights by B.36s at Machri, as I recall one a month at least. Maybe the base was a waypoint. At that time was in the local ATC whose CO was an ex-Coastal Cmmd Anson pilot (later flying PR Mosquitoes) who’d retired and bought a farm there after the war. Seems he knew just about everybody in the RAF and had contacts in the USAF as well. He would tell us of an upcoming overflight and we’d cycle out to the base to watch the huge thing trundle past at fairly lo-lvel (~1500). Machrihanish at that time was RNAS with, mostly, Fireflies and a few Ansons and Barracuda (I think), so the B.36s were a welcome diversion from the usual aircraft dodging about.

    .

    in reply to: CHINAGRAPH #1286337
    LesB
    Participant

    The Yanks (NASA) spending millions on researching a pen that was suitable for space use – while the Ruskies quietly carried on working with pencils…

    Which were soon cancelled because of the danger to the electronics (and fire etc) from floating particles of wood and graphite dust . . . which was why Fisher (not NASA) developed the pen.

    From Snopes . . . .

    NASA never asked Paul C. Fisher to produce a pen. When the astronauts began to fly, like the Russians, they used pencils, but the leads sometimes broke and became a hazard by floating in the [capsule’s] atmosphere where there was no gravity. They could float into an eye or nose or cause a short in an electrical device. In addition, both the lead and the wood of the pencil could burn rapidly in the pure oxygen atmosphere. Paul Fisher realized the astronauts needed a safer and more dependable writing instrument, so in July 1965 he developed the pressurized ball pen, with its ink enclosed in a sealed, pressurized ink cartridge. Fisher sent the first samples to Dr. Robert Gilruth, Director of the Houston Space Center. The pens were all metal except for the ink, which had a flash point above 200°C. The sample Space Pens were thoroughly tested by NASA. They passed all the tests and have been used ever since on all manned space flights, American and Russian. All research and developement costs were paid by Paul Fisher. No development costs have ever been charged to the government.

    Shame to shoot down a nice bit of yank bashing, innit!

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Something Missing #1286349
    LesB
    Participant

    Is she still around?

    No. She got married and moved to Safron Waldon.

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: PR9 #1288682
    LesB
    Participant

    fatnav
    Thanks for the gen. To think that a cheapo chinagraph could play such an important role is simply unbelievable. All in the days before GPS of course. Only serious service limitation on chinagraphs as I recall was operation in high temps. They made a real mess in your pocket when used at Idris for instance.

    Not only on 9s (or even not only on Canberras), the chinagraph grease pencil may just be the unsung hero of many a successful RAF mission. Used to good effect on our B.6Rs on 51 Sqn (for reasons I somehow can’t recall ;)), as well as helping to raise the ‘accuracy’ on the 8s and (I)6s when using the gunpack . . . .

    Wonder if the steeley-eyed wonders of the ‘modern’ FJ fraternity still find them useful? I mean for more than just jotting notes on a kneepad.

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 681 total)