dark light

LesB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 681 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Percival Pembroke – Spyplane #1348082
    LesB
    Participant

    I think the U.K. spy flights in the Cold War are a hidden secret which needs publicising . . .

    Why do you think so? I ask because most of the people that flew the missions, as well as those that authorised them, are still alive today, exposure could be embarrassing in some cases. Besides, the public domain has enough accessible records of nuke sniffer flights and lo-hi-lo alt PR flights to keep conspiricists happily busy for years. You won’t find much about singleton “penetrations” though, at least not for another 30 years or so. :rolleyes:

    . . .whereas the U.S. spy flights are very public knowledge.

    True but only if you have the time, and resources, to wade through several US databases matching a/c serials, unit numbers and flight records from one with “supposed” mission profiles and unit locations from others.

    in reply to: MOST COST EFFECTIVE MULTI-ROLE JET AIRCRAFT #1349067
    LesB
    Participant

    EE Canberra – Nothing even compares!

    Agreed David. Also, nuclear bomber, maritime attack, ground attack, ECM, ECM trainer, in-flight refueling, rocket motor test airframe, radar research (various), torpedo trials aircraft, flying tape recorder :rolleyes:, and probably a lot more once-only roles we will never hear about.

    Unsung, un-sexy, but still the Queen of the Skies. 😉

    .

    in reply to: Legends 2006 #1357560
    LesB
    Participant

    Take yourself off to legends if you want. Then, and this is important, form your own opinion of the show don’t just take on-board the opinions of others. They may know the colour of socks any particular pilot is wearing when zooming in his Spit-tang or whatever, but your own impressions are what counts in the long run.

    If by some chance you happen to get to Waddo next year come across to the Canberra Assoc flight line enclosure, I’ll let you in and we’ll make you welcome. You can mingle with and talk informally to blokes who actually flew with the RAF in the days we had a proper air force – Cans, Vulcs, Shacks, Victors, Lightnings, Hunters, Buccs, etc. You may just get more than you bargin for though as they’re not easy to shut-up when in the “There I was . . ” mode!!

    .

    in reply to: WJ874 – any news yet ? #1358075
    LesB
    Participant

    Is that the one that was based at Van Nuys a few years back?

    Yes.

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/wj574-lrg.jpg

    Pic taken in 2000 at Van Nuys by Brian Connally

    in reply to: WJ874 – any news yet ? #1358087
    LesB
    Participant

    Chilean Air Force PR9s too?

    There were three of them, XH166, XH167 and XH173. 167 crashed during a PR mission on 23 May 1983. I believe the two are now statics at the National Air & Space Museum, Los Cerrillos, Chile. Or maybe just 173 with 166 being used as a christmas tree.

    .

    in reply to: WJ874 – any news yet ? #1358427
    LesB
    Participant

    LesB, You say 3 are flying in the USA, I am aware of the 2 flying with High Altitude Mapping Missions, however could you provide details about the 3rd example please ?

    The third, as Mark says, is Tom Foscue’s ex-FRADU TT.18 WJ574. Also, as posted by David, it possibly hasn’t actually flown for a while as Tom is in the process of selling it on but it is an airworthy airframe (at least up to a month or so back it was). 😎

    in reply to: WJ874 – any news yet ? #1364129
    LesB
    Participant

    Brit Canuk

    I make it about dozen. As follows . . . three private in the US (two earning revenue); one private in Australia (Temora); one private in the UK (WK163); four RAF (PR.9); possibly three Indian Air Force (1 B(I)58 + 2 PR.7).

    Web Pilot
    Too anoraky about the roundal when the blue paint itself is the wrong shade. Anyway, it’s a standard cooking T.4 not the original. It satisfies a requirement as a symbol not as a 1:1 scale replica. :rolleyes:

    .

    in reply to: WJ874 – any news yet ? #1364472
    LesB
    Participant

    With the FRADU Historic Aircraft Flight.

    Is that a statement of intent Mark or a wish? :rolleyes:

    Wherever it goes, it should be left in the VN799 markings I think. In “normal” T.4 markings and colours it’s just another dayglo or camo cranberrie.

    It would serve well as a Gate Guard somewhere but the RAF is running short of stations these days. 🙁 It would look good at Samlesbury, better that the unassuming PR.7 (WT537) they have there at the moment, and it would be close to the “home” of Canberras.

    .

    in reply to: Canberra Cockpit forsale! #1370739
    LesB
    Participant

    At the time I think it had a blue globe on the tail fin – not sure what that was all about!

    That was the badge of 1 PRU. Initially the PR.9s from Wyton’s 39 Sqn were transferred to this PRU when they moved to Marham. Later though they discarded the “Globe” and became 39 Sqn again with the winged bomb on the fin.

    😉

    in reply to: Canberra T4 WT486 #1379724
    LesB
    Participant

    Sniper

    Check your PMs

    .

    in reply to: …Your exit may be behind you… #1382701
    LesB
    Participant

    Mossie was starboard. Canberra too.

    Always thought the entrance of the Mossie was underneath or some reason.

    As far as the Canberra is concerned, the entrance is on the stbd side because the control runs are on the port – that’s why the B(I)8 had an off-set cockpit.

    .

    in reply to: Hunter XF382 #1389062
    LesB
    Participant

    To get back on topic. . .

    A couple of people e-mailed regarding the two “Comparison” pics I posted previously (above). Comment was about the narrow width of the grey camo in front of the Hunter’s cockpit. Well folks, the painter wants to thank you for pointing that out and has now rectified it. The forward demarcation line of the grey camo area now follows more closely pics they have of the actual kite. See “Compare II” pics below.

    This gentlemanly and fast response from the paint team shows that MAM does take note of comment from its viewing public. 😉

    in reply to: DEAR MR/MRS COSFORD ££££££s! #1391964
    LesB
    Participant

    As for your comments Les – a BI(8) would be a superb aircraft to display (again !) at Cosford. I would hope that the New Zealanders are keeping a close eye on some of their former interdictors as they are retired and lapsing into dereliction.

    Sincerely doubt it Dave. They haven’t even bothered to clean the rubberised transportation gunk off WT346 let alone putting it back together again. A recent photo sent to me shows it pretty much in the same state as is shown on my web site. If they can’t be bothered to do anything with WT346 I doubt they’ll persue their own 8s in India. WT346 has been out there since 1993 (April) but even then, Cosford wanted to sell it to a scrapman! 😡 Pic taken April this year.

    http://www.canberra.plus.com/pics/WT346.jpg

    Crying shame as the only other complete example of this noteworthy Cold War aircraft is in Gemany!

    So, as far as F-111s and Lodestars are concerned, until we recognise our own CW history, it’s all so much hot air. 😡

    And I don’t want to hear about the B(I)8 at Newark – that ‘frame didn’t see service and is not representative of anything.

    . . . and it’s an aircraft I worked on in Germany.

    in reply to: Precision bombing #1392559
    LesB
    Participant

    It could be argued 😉 – Devil’s Advocaat

    Go on then. :rolleyes:

    Edited to say – pretty pointless now I guess. Wish I could type faster! 😀

    .

    in reply to: DEAR MR/MRS COSFORD ££££££s! #1392563
    LesB
    Participant

    Cosford would do better to swallow their past mistake and get that B(I)8 back from NZ. To me, that kite is much more representative of our Cold War than any F-111.

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 681 total)