dark light

Jon H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,237 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Phantom Preservation Society #1097859
    Jon H
    Participant

    Cheers for that Pete, nah, not going up market, just need some info.

    Failing that try forumite ANON, as he is another collector of all things Phantom!

    Jon

    in reply to: Miracle B-17 Makes It Home After Nose Blown Away #1098242
    Jon H
    Participant

    As regards the F5/Halifax photo above,after looking at it again,I thought hmmm … possible to fly with that damage ??
    So I did a bit of googling and there has been some discussion on at least one website as to whether it might have been a ground collision at Speke !!
    Anybody know anything about it ??

    Wouldn’t surprise me!

    About the only place I can think of Halifaxes (churned out of Rootes) and P38’s (being assembled in the Hangars on the other side of the field) operating in close proximity in daytime.

    Also the picture has been retouched to remove any background detail, so the location is clearly sensitive – I wonder if it had something like Garston gasworks in the background!

    One other thought then, can anyone tie it up with a Halifax loss in December 1943? The date coming from some reserach on the internet.

    Jon

    in reply to: Heathrow 1970's Fire Dump #1098515
    Jon H
    Participant

    That’s good news. I used to see it as we taxied past, but I shall look out for it next Friday when I fly into LTN

    Laurence

    This is the kind of view you should expect to see, just from further away ๐Ÿ™‚

    Jon

    in reply to: Heathrow 1970's Fire Dump #1098528
    Jon H
    Participant

    I thought the Britannia had gone, to be replaced by one of those green monsters. I haven’t seen its fuselage at Luton in the last year or two.

    Laurence

    It has in terms of location, however look to the south of it on google maps ๐Ÿ˜€

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=luton&sll=53.304211,-2.942834&sspn=0.005719,0.013754&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Luton,+Bedfordshire,+United+Kingdom&ll=51.879942,-0.360918&spn=0.002954,0.006877&t=h&z=17

    A few years back it was moved up the embankment to better represent a crashed aircraft for training exercises. The tracks you can see trailing behind it were dug out to simulate were engines etc had plouged through the ground on impact. When I went they were overgrown and found them the hard way ๐Ÿ˜€

    Chatting with the guys in the Fire Department afterwards they said it was going nowhere anytime soon as was perfect for what they needed.

    I have some pictures somewhere if anyone is interested.

    Jon

    in reply to: Heathrow 1970's Fire Dump #1099067
    Jon H
    Participant

    If I can expand the thread I started:
    Talking about the miracles of abandoned vintage aircraft still existing at modern UK airports, are there any other “historic” aircraft still on dumps at any UK airports? Wasn’t a Bristol Britannia saved recently or at least parts stripped from one on a fire dump to save another?

    Britannia G-AOVS is still earning its keep with the Fire Section at Luton after some 20+ years. A few years back now I removed the very few remaining useful parts from the cockpit and were passed on to G-ANCF to replace parts it was missing (pilots seat being the most obvious one).

    Jon

    in reply to: Heathrow 1970's Fire Dump #1099077
    Jon H
    Participant

    I believe that Newark might have made enquiries about the Argonaut but it was around the time that both the Gannet and Vulcan acquisitions were in the pipeline so I understand that sadly it went by the wayside.

    I guess it might also come under the thread โ€œWhat has slipped through your fingersโ€ ๐Ÿ™

    Looking at the picture of it taken in 1977 (link posted earlier) its fate had long been sealed with the nose smashed off and extensive fire damage to the lower part of the fuselage. What a shame…..

    Jon

    in reply to: Farmborough fire dump Pics please :) #1099082
    Jon H
    Participant

    Merkle,

    Hope for your sake mate the deal is done, as you have given plenty of information now for someone else who wants said pit to come in and snatch it from you…..

    Jon

    in reply to: Jet Provost Colours #1100497
    Jon H
    Participant

    To answer the original post, the colours are Signal Red and Light Aircraft Grey (and white) The wings are grey.

    BS nos are BS381C no 541 Signal Red and BS381C no 627 Ligh Aircraft Grey

    BS381C No 541 is maroon, BS381C No 537 is signal red.

    http://www.nspcoatings.co.uk/bs381c-colour-charts.php

    Jon

    in reply to: Would you buy a used airframe from these guys? #1102817
    Jon H
    Participant

    Or how about whack the Piรฑata complete with occupant….? ๐Ÿ˜€

    Jon

    Jon H
    Participant

    http://home.comcast.net/~aero51/html/exhibits/martinet_restoration.htm

    This is the one, they turned it into a Martinet instead. Not that I object though, it’s a magnificent project.
    Cees

    Reading their website that is not the implication. It reads as always being a Martinet project (TT.1 MS902) that along the way has incorporated some Master components.

    Jon

    in reply to: Sea Hurricanes #1106102
    Jon H
    Participant

    Definitely the flexible coupling to the radiator shroud is for heating. So if the radiator is being heated then why not the engine too, and then why not the wing root?

    I have seen a photo of a finish hurricane where there is a draincock on the bottom of the radiator for draining the glycol for freezing, so likely the CAM aircraft had a similar problem. Hence the heating?

    All very intriguing.

    Regards,

    As you have said there is a flexible coupling into the radiator, so why then alter and substantially increase the construction for the other pipework IF that is what it is for?

    Jon

    in reply to: General Discussion #356808
    Jon H
    Participant
    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today? #1921566
    Jon H
    Participant
    in reply to: Sea Hurricanes #1107652
    Jon H
    Participant

    To me they look like transport struts for when the Hurricat is not being used/or needed – rolling around in high seas or when in port for example.

    I struggle with the heating theory for two reasons –
    Firstly the construction is surely too heavy and cumbersome for the supposed purpose? Why make it like that when there are other lighter and quicker options?
    Secondly the ship is clearly in port so why have it primed and ready to go?

    Jon

    in reply to: What Projects Might Emerge In The Near Future? #1113398
    Jon H
    Participant

    Any hope of news on the Gamecock?? (TexanTomcat?)

    Roger Smith.

    Isnt there a smallish piece on it in either this months Flypast or Aeroplane Monthly?? Or have I imagined that………

    Jon

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,237 total)