Cheers for that Pete, nah, not going up market, just need some info.
Failing that try forumite ANON, as he is another collector of all things Phantom!
Jon
As regards the F5/Halifax photo above,after looking at it again,I thought hmmm … possible to fly with that damage ??
So I did a bit of googling and there has been some discussion on at least one website as to whether it might have been a ground collision at Speke !!
Anybody know anything about it ??
Wouldn’t surprise me!
About the only place I can think of Halifaxes (churned out of Rootes) and P38’s (being assembled in the Hangars on the other side of the field) operating in close proximity in daytime.
Also the picture has been retouched to remove any background detail, so the location is clearly sensitive – I wonder if it had something like Garston gasworks in the background!
One other thought then, can anyone tie it up with a Halifax loss in December 1943? The date coming from some reserach on the internet.
Jon
That’s good news. I used to see it as we taxied past, but I shall look out for it next Friday when I fly into LTN
Laurence
This is the kind of view you should expect to see, just from further away ๐
Jon
I thought the Britannia had gone, to be replaced by one of those green monsters. I haven’t seen its fuselage at Luton in the last year or two.
Laurence
It has in terms of location, however look to the south of it on google maps ๐
A few years back it was moved up the embankment to better represent a crashed aircraft for training exercises. The tracks you can see trailing behind it were dug out to simulate were engines etc had plouged through the ground on impact. When I went they were overgrown and found them the hard way ๐
Chatting with the guys in the Fire Department afterwards they said it was going nowhere anytime soon as was perfect for what they needed.
I have some pictures somewhere if anyone is interested.
Jon
If I can expand the thread I started:
Talking about the miracles of abandoned vintage aircraft still existing at modern UK airports, are there any other “historic” aircraft still on dumps at any UK airports? Wasn’t a Bristol Britannia saved recently or at least parts stripped from one on a fire dump to save another?
Britannia G-AOVS is still earning its keep with the Fire Section at Luton after some 20+ years. A few years back now I removed the very few remaining useful parts from the cockpit and were passed on to G-ANCF to replace parts it was missing (pilots seat being the most obvious one).
Jon
I believe that Newark might have made enquiries about the Argonaut but it was around the time that both the Gannet and Vulcan acquisitions were in the pipeline so I understand that sadly it went by the wayside.
I guess it might also come under the thread โWhat has slipped through your fingersโ ๐
Looking at the picture of it taken in 1977 (link posted earlier) its fate had long been sealed with the nose smashed off and extensive fire damage to the lower part of the fuselage. What a shame…..
Jon
Merkle,
Hope for your sake mate the deal is done, as you have given plenty of information now for someone else who wants said pit to come in and snatch it from you…..
Jon
To answer the original post, the colours are Signal Red and Light Aircraft Grey (and white) The wings are grey.
BS nos are BS381C no 541 Signal Red and BS381C no 627 Ligh Aircraft Grey
BS381C No 541 is maroon, BS381C No 537 is signal red.
http://www.nspcoatings.co.uk/bs381c-colour-charts.php
Jon
Or how about whack the Piรฑata complete with occupant….? ๐
Jon
http://home.comcast.net/~aero51/html/exhibits/martinet_restoration.htm
This is the one, they turned it into a Martinet instead. Not that I object though, it’s a magnificent project.
Cees
Reading their website that is not the implication. It reads as always being a Martinet project (TT.1 MS902) that along the way has incorporated some Master components.
Jon
Definitely the flexible coupling to the radiator shroud is for heating. So if the radiator is being heated then why not the engine too, and then why not the wing root?
I have seen a photo of a finish hurricane where there is a draincock on the bottom of the radiator for draining the glycol for freezing, so likely the CAM aircraft had a similar problem. Hence the heating?
All very intriguing.
Regards,
As you have said there is a flexible coupling into the radiator, so why then alter and substantially increase the construction for the other pipework IF that is what it is for?
Jon
To me they look like transport struts for when the Hurricat is not being used/or needed – rolling around in high seas or when in port for example.
I struggle with the heating theory for two reasons –
Firstly the construction is surely too heavy and cumbersome for the supposed purpose? Why make it like that when there are other lighter and quicker options?
Secondly the ship is clearly in port so why have it primed and ready to go?
Jon
Any hope of news on the Gamecock?? (TexanTomcat?)
Roger Smith.
Isnt there a smallish piece on it in either this months Flypast or Aeroplane Monthly?? Or have I imagined that………
Jon