Greygate plastic polish was the stuff mandated by the RAF for aircraft transparencies when I last worked on live airframes about 20 years ago. I wondered if you could still get the stuff – now I know! I have used it for polishing glider canopies too.
Like Jon H I found that Brasso would be quite quick at removing stubborn stuff but don’t dismiss Greygate though. It can remove some quite deep scratches given time and elbow grease!
Regards, Aerial
Hmmm interesting…. *as he thinks about tackling the Sea Hawk canopy* 😀
Jon
Spot of brasso if you hit some stubborn stuff.
Jon
While I think about it, the Ghost Lancastrian also flew before the Comet; as a testbed for the Comet engines, and was technically a jet airliner, but as Graham rightly says, it was a conversion of an existing piston type.
Bruce
See this is where to my mind things get interesting and hence why I threw the spanner in the works.
The criteria and indeed the title of the thread is – “the world’s first jet airliner flies!” The Viking was designed as an airliner (the VC.1) and ‘JPH flew with jet engines from day one. So surely that makes it a jet airliner? It was designed as a jet, rolled off the production line as a jet and flew for something like 6 years as a jet – yet we are saying it isnt a jet airliner because Vickers started with an existing design?
I should add I am not trying to detract ANYTHING from the Comet, just having a good old debate 🙂
Jon
At 6.17pm on Wednesday 27th July 1949 the first true flight of the world’s first jet airliner occurred. John Cunningham, John Wilson, F T Reynolds, H Waters and A. J. Fairbrother were on board.
Always being one for stimulating a good debate, how does this effect things then? –
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vickers_Nene_Viking_G-AJPH.jpg
“The photograph shows a uniquely modified aircraft which was the world’s first jet powered airliner.” First flight on April 6 1948.
Jon
A nice picture totally original (not) of a B-17 comming down
Item 290331676360
(a good example of a photoshopped photograph and someone trying to pass it off as a wartime original, check the nose art, its Sally B)
Ha!!!!! Took less than a minute to find the original picture on the internet.
If you are going to do this at least make more of an attempt than going to wikipedia and lifting the image straight from there!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/B-17G-105_44-85784-Sally_B.jpg
I have flipped the original for comparison. Also explains why most the markings have been “rubbed” out…
Jon
Nick Grace also seemed to be involved with Fireflies WD899 and VT409.
Doubt it given they are still owned by Unimetals – the people that had the Failsworth scrapyard they were found in. Bits now on display at RAF Millom museum along with Swift WK198 and the Balliol cockpit (id escapes me currently) which they also still own.
Front half WD889, rear half VT409
http://www.demobbed.org.uk/images/wd889.jpg
Jon
The man you want is “Air Ministry” on here 🙂 Drop him a PM.
Jon
I do like the irony of the pilot celebrating with a nice cold bottle of Spitfire Real Ale! 😀
Jon
PORT gunports, surely? 😉
Oops!
What he said 😉
Jon
So far have –
1 Nose F-100
2 Tailwheel of TBM Avenger
3 Mainwheels on SR71
4 Chin/belly turret of B29
5 Tail of B52
6 Nose gun on A10
7 main landing gear on B52
8 No.3 engine on B24
9 Port mainleg on P47
10 tail of Victor
11 Port intake of F4
12 Rotorhead of Huey
13 underside of T33
14 Courtesy of Creaking door above – STBD gunports on nose of Sunderland
15 Exhaust of RR Griffon on Shackleton
All done 😀
Jon
And the second picture of the evening.
Aerial shot of the area with the major landmarks of the old airbase shown on the first scan labelled.
The nearest accomodation sites were Sites 4 & 5 but as you can see they were to the South of Goldcliffe Close. In fact looking at the picture Wieesso found Site 5 can be seen in the top left corner with woods on 2 sides of it.
Jon
Scan showing how the M62 cut through the airfield site (taken from Aldon Fergusons excellent book “Royal Air Force Burtonwood”)
Jon
and as far as i know the only buildings left have a link to the air base are the “TOBBACO HOUSES” as they are known locally, where USAF personel used to live with their famillies. And i think those have been emptied ready for demolition.
If they are where I think they are (off Sycamore Lane) they were demolished a few years back now and a new housing estate has been built on it.
Happy to be proved wrong but I think ALL airfield structures of any description have gone now. Did find some fencing, gates etc but nothing meaningful. Though I do know where there are 2 Nissen huts down the road that are most likely ex Burtonwood.
Jon
Doesnt look likely Kev.
Dug out the notes and looks to have been outside of the airfield boundaries and most likely just farmland.
Give me 2 minutes – just scanning a map of the place now to help put it all in perspective.
Jon