dark light

Jon H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 1,237 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whats the best restorer for bakerlite items ? #1165288
    Jon H
    Participant

    Greygate plastic polish was the stuff mandated by the RAF for aircraft transparencies when I last worked on live airframes about 20 years ago. I wondered if you could still get the stuff – now I know! I have used it for polishing glider canopies too.
    Like Jon H I found that Brasso would be quite quick at removing stubborn stuff but don’t dismiss Greygate though. It can remove some quite deep scratches given time and elbow grease!
    Regards, Aerial

    Hmmm interesting…. *as he thinks about tackling the Sea Hawk canopy* 😀

    Jon

    in reply to: Whats the best restorer for bakerlite items ? #1165608
    Jon H
    Participant

    Spot of brasso if you hit some stubborn stuff.

    Jon

    Jon H
    Participant

    While I think about it, the Ghost Lancastrian also flew before the Comet; as a testbed for the Comet engines, and was technically a jet airliner, but as Graham rightly says, it was a conversion of an existing piston type.

    Bruce

    See this is where to my mind things get interesting and hence why I threw the spanner in the works.

    The criteria and indeed the title of the thread is – “the world’s first jet airliner flies!” The Viking was designed as an airliner (the VC.1) and ‘JPH flew with jet engines from day one. So surely that makes it a jet airliner? It was designed as a jet, rolled off the production line as a jet and flew for something like 6 years as a jet – yet we are saying it isnt a jet airliner because Vickers started with an existing design?

    I should add I am not trying to detract ANYTHING from the Comet, just having a good old debate 🙂

    Jon

    Jon H
    Participant

    At 6.17pm on Wednesday 27th July 1949 the first true flight of the world’s first jet airliner occurred. John Cunningham, John Wilson, F T Reynolds, H Waters and A. J. Fairbrother were on board.

    Always being one for stimulating a good debate, how does this effect things then? –

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vickers_Nene_Viking_G-AJPH.jpg

    “The photograph shows a uniquely modified aircraft which was the world’s first jet powered airliner.” First flight on April 6 1948.

    Jon

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1171271
    Jon H
    Participant

    A nice picture totally original (not) of a B-17 comming down

    Item 290331676360

    http://cgi.ebay.com/MILITARY-PHOTO-WWII-Crashing-B17-Bomber-NEW-LOOK_W0QQitemZ290331676360QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item43991dcec8&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A12%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C72%3A1205%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50

    (a good example of a photoshopped photograph and someone trying to pass it off as a wartime original, check the nose art, its Sally B)

    Ha!!!!! Took less than a minute to find the original picture on the internet.

    If you are going to do this at least make more of an attempt than going to wikipedia and lifting the image straight from there!

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/B-17G-105_44-85784-Sally_B.jpg

    I have flipped the original for comparison. Also explains why most the markings have been “rubbed” out…

    Jon

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1178111
    Jon H
    Participant
    in reply to: The Grace Firefly… what happened to it.? #1178285
    Jon H
    Participant

    Nick Grace also seemed to be involved with Fireflies WD899 and VT409.

    Doubt it given they are still owned by Unimetals – the people that had the Failsworth scrapyard they were found in. Bits now on display at RAF Millom museum along with Swift WK198 and the Balliol cockpit (id escapes me currently) which they also still own.

    Front half WD889, rear half VT409

    http://www.demobbed.org.uk/images/wd889.jpg

    Jon

    in reply to: Air Ministry Fuses needed! #1180832
    Jon H
    Participant

    The man you want is “Air Ministry” on here 🙂 Drop him a PM.

    Jon

    in reply to: 190 trouble? #1181906
    Jon H
    Participant

    I do like the irony of the pilot celebrating with a nice cold bottle of Spitfire Real Ale! 😀

    Jon

    in reply to: Noses, Tails and odd bits #1182214
    Jon H
    Participant

    PORT gunports, surely? 😉

    Oops!

    What he said 😉

    Jon

    in reply to: Noses, Tails and odd bits #1182348
    Jon H
    Participant

    So far have –

    1 Nose F-100
    2 Tailwheel of TBM Avenger
    3 Mainwheels on SR71
    4 Chin/belly turret of B29
    5 Tail of B52
    6 Nose gun on A10
    7 main landing gear on B52
    8 No.3 engine on B24
    9 Port mainleg on P47
    10 tail of Victor
    11 Port intake of F4
    12 Rotorhead of Huey
    13 underside of T33
    14 Courtesy of Creaking door above – STBD gunports on nose of Sunderland
    15 Exhaust of RR Griffon on Shackleton

    All done 😀

    Jon

    in reply to: Burtonwood Air Base #1182978
    Jon H
    Participant

    And the second picture of the evening.

    Aerial shot of the area with the major landmarks of the old airbase shown on the first scan labelled.

    The nearest accomodation sites were Sites 4 & 5 but as you can see they were to the South of Goldcliffe Close. In fact looking at the picture Wieesso found Site 5 can be seen in the top left corner with woods on 2 sides of it.

    Jon

    in reply to: Burtonwood Air Base #1182998
    Jon H
    Participant

    Scan showing how the M62 cut through the airfield site (taken from Aldon Fergusons excellent book “Royal Air Force Burtonwood”)

    Jon

    in reply to: Burtonwood Air Base #1183006
    Jon H
    Participant

    and as far as i know the only buildings left have a link to the air base are the “TOBBACO HOUSES” as they are known locally, where USAF personel used to live with their famillies. And i think those have been emptied ready for demolition.

    If they are where I think they are (off Sycamore Lane) they were demolished a few years back now and a new housing estate has been built on it.

    Happy to be proved wrong but I think ALL airfield structures of any description have gone now. Did find some fencing, gates etc but nothing meaningful. Though I do know where there are 2 Nissen huts down the road that are most likely ex Burtonwood.

    Jon

    in reply to: Burtonwood Air Base #1183011
    Jon H
    Participant

    Doesnt look likely Kev.

    Dug out the notes and looks to have been outside of the airfield boundaries and most likely just farmland.

    Give me 2 minutes – just scanning a map of the place now to help put it all in perspective.

    Jon

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 1,237 total)