dark light
Airliner World
Combat Aircraft
AeroPlane
Flypast
Airforces
Aviation
Pcpilot
Air

vikraal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 130 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 7 8 9
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 3, 2006 at 6:43 pm in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2596716
    vikraal
    Participant

    Nice one george. looks like you showed the uruk-hai drones their proper place. LOL comparing the C- grade pLAAF TO iaf, 😀

    February 2, 2006 at 11:42 pm in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2597494
    vikraal
    Participant

    George I can’t believe you are actually putting an effort to talk to these people. If they want to believe their ting-jing-bing airforce is as good as IAF, good luck to them. Stop wasting your time. So have they even figured out how many hours the Su pilots get in china, let me guess 45 on Su, 65 on J-7 and 100 on k-8 or cessna :))

    January 29, 2006 at 1:45 am in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2599828
    vikraal
    Participant

    Last I heard F-22a was 258 million per jet. No way F-22 is going for 100 million, thats what the americans charged for the crappy F-15K’s.

    January 24, 2006 at 11:38 pm in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2601512
    vikraal
    Participant

    M2k-5 and/or mig 35 for IAF…

    January 24, 2006 at 12:53 am in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2601888
    vikraal
    Participant

    Accodring to FAS,

    India
    Flying Hours: 180+

    China
    Flight Hours: H-6 80; J-7 and J-8 130; Su-27/Su-30 180

    Try again

    180 hours is for mig-21 kiddos. The Su-30 and mirages are on the 240-300 hour schedule.

    January 23, 2006 at 9:35 pm in reply to: would anyone by are invisivble class carrier #2065357
    vikraal
    Participant

    IN is ordering 2 mistral class LPD’s. So why not a couple of LPH in the next 6-7 years.

    January 23, 2006 at 9:17 pm in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2601994
    vikraal
    Participant

    PLAAF pilots are trained to Indian standards is a ridiculous statement. So how many’s Su’s have they crashed yet? If like Mirage-3 says 100 hours is the average norm then yes no Indian is ever going to worry about chinese AF.

    January 21, 2006 at 2:51 pm in reply to: would anyone by are invisivble class carrier #2065573
    vikraal
    Participant

    IN could look into using it as a helicopter carrier with slight modifications, but it all depends on how much it would cost. I don’t think age is an issue, invincible is 25 years old i believe while the hermes is going strong at 50.

    January 21, 2006 at 2:45 pm in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2602945
    vikraal
    Participant

    100 hours is too less. I always assumed an average mig-21 pilot gets about 180 hours at the minimum in IAF.

    December 16, 2005 at 5:10 am in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069390
    vikraal
    Participant

    The first pic does show a heli on the helipad. I assume it means that kashins can still carry ka-28’s

    December 16, 2005 at 3:13 am in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069410
    vikraal
    Participant

    Great so I guess the last two kashins will have 16 brahmos each. Would the older three only have 8 ? IS it possible to requip other capital ships like delhi or godavari’s with brahmos?

    December 10, 2005 at 7:00 am in reply to: Israel submarine launched strategic cruise missile? #2070003
    vikraal
    Participant

    I believe it was the popeye missile tested off the coast of srilanka.

    December 8, 2005 at 2:42 am in reply to: Russia to sell 29 air defense systems to Iran #1822562
    vikraal
    Participant

    Star49, stop talking nonsense. Iran has neither the trained manpower nor the money to spend as muh as russia or china. Their IRBM’s are in no way even comparable to the ICBM’s that russia had 3-4 decades ago. The very fact that they had to acquire some parts from pakistan which are old rip offs of the 60’s nuke design from china tells us that they aren’t all that advanced in the field. They are trying to develop independently but the nonsense you just mentioned is beyond crap.

    December 6, 2005 at 5:20 pm in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #1822631
    vikraal
    Participant

    Does anyone have any pics of these models?

    December 6, 2005 at 7:28 am in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #1822675
    vikraal
    Participant

    http://www.indiadefence.com/navyupdate.htm

    No rajputs can only take 8 brahmos, which would increase the damage they can inflict. I believe the ranvir and ranvijay will get 8 vls brahmos while the older three can get 8 inclined brahmos box launchers. I wonder if there are any plans to equip the godavari’s with brahmos?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 130 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 7 8 9