It’s no different in the art world. Some of the world’s greatest paintings, sculptures and historical artifacts will never again be seen by the public. Hard to say why such collectors value such privacy..
For many, it’s precisely that no-one else but them, and those they choose, can see the articles.
Interesting video. Shouldn’t that be Fleet Air Arm Firefly
Err, shouldn’t that be Marine Luchtvaartdienst (Dutch Navy) Firefly?
Interesting video. Shouldn’t that be Fleet Air Arm Firefly
Err, shouldn’t that be Marine Luchtvaartdienst (Dutch Navy) Firefly?
The RAF had examples of the Hs126 (in North Africa) and Hs129, but not the Hs123
The RAF had examples of the Hs126 (in North Africa) and Hs129, but not the Hs123
Why is everyone so excited about a replica with a dataplate?:diablo:
It’s a flying Mosquito!! :diablo:
Why is everyone so excited about a replica with a dataplate?:diablo:
It’s a flying Mosquito!! :diablo:
What’s the story behind the Sabre at MAM?
ex-American Air Museum, Duxford
What’s the story behind the Sabre at MAM?
ex-American Air Museum, Duxford
Not truly Historic material but never mind, they will be given time.
Isn’t there one in Lincolnshire now with the RAF?
Moggy
The RAF’s first one has flown, but it’s still in the States.
Not truly Historic material but never mind, they will be given time.
Isn’t there one in Lincolnshire now with the RAF?
Moggy
The RAF’s first one has flown, but it’s still in the States.
It’s the TWU crest, based on the preceeding 229 OCU one.
http://img.wp.scn.ru/camms/ar/632/pics/9_8.jpg
229:
Not sure about the writing – looks like stencilling, but is not apparent on a pic of the same aircraft taken a year later in 83.
Steve,
I hope this is of some interest, Tony Broadhurst
It was, very interesting. I’d love to see it restored as a static exhibit, perhaps as an Indian or Rhodesian example if not 24 EFTS. The Cornell’s use by the RAF outside of Canada has had little coverage over the years.
You know….I’m kinda thinking that RAFM should instruct MAPS at Rochester to put in its markings as DG200. Why not? 🙂
At least they wouldn’t need to go hunting for a canopy!
I’d love to see that! If I ever had enough money to buy a 109, even a replica, that would be my choice!
One reason I’m interested to see a pic of it before restoration is that when they re-built AE479(1404) in early 1941, they replaced her early E-1/3 canopy/windscreen with a later E-4 version.
In fact, bearing in mind the timescales of the rebuild of both airframes, it’s possible that the canopy seen on DG200 in that pic was passed over for AE479’s rebuild, the latter’s role at AFDU being deemed more important – but that’s just conjecture on my part.