3) Good quality replicas. (We should not ignore these, the RAF Museum’s Wallace is a fine example of what can be done.)
.
There is nothing ‘replica’ about the RAFM Wallace. It may be a restoration, but there is a substantial amount of original aircraft in there.
Just a pity they couldn’t restore the wings as well.
There is beleived to be a second UAV squadron forming next year, which could take the 1 or 4 badge – alternatively, if the second and third Leuchars Typhoon squadrons emerge, 43 and 111 could be consigned to history.
The T2s are due to go next March, replaced by the Beech 350s now at Culdrose for fitting out.
Until then, they remain the most capable maritime aircraft in the inventory! :diablo:
The T3s aren’t THAT far removed form the civil J31, so perhaps the MOD hopes to sell to anyone still using those.
With thanks to Dave Fleming from another forum 2008: FR209 AAEE/ECFS/EFS/Met Res Flt To 6891M 13.9.51
FR209 is interesting as it served into the early 50s in overall natural metal, and was converted to glass nosed standard.
Hope this solves the identity.
Now where have I heard that name before….:cool::). There are a few pics of FR209 in various publications.
There were a few things that lurked around for a while (as well as the C-45s, Harvards and Dakotas that were purchased) – some Baltimores were used by Fleet Requirements units, and a Hadrian was used at AFEE (?).
Almost certainly FR209.
FR209 is particularly interesting as it actually started life (and it’s RAF Service) as a big-gun B-25G, with the short nose, and at some time in it’s life had the nose from a bomber Mitchell fitted on the front of it.
Was at one point the personal transport of AVM Sir Roderick Hill
My brain said Anson, my fingers typed Oxford!! 😮
The aircraft is an Airspeed Oxford
No doubt the ‘secret’ hinted at in the video is the truth we all know!
BTW, uploaded by the author in this case.
AFAIK, that’s about it (although Vic Flintham and Andy Thomas had tracked down the possible meaning of ‘DPA’ after publishing the first edition of Combat Codes – email note I got from Vic is on another computer)
Folland Gnat on an aircraft carrier in Hot Shots!
Why didn’t we keep the Mi-8s at Boscombe Down? I’m sure the ETPS would have found them a very useful training aircraft as they must have very little similarities to the modern western helicopters the RAF operates.
They were purchased purely for the Afghan pilot training program (albeit substantailly updated with western DASS and instrumentation) and at the end of that they were donated to the Afghan Army for use over there. The more helos they have, the better.
If ETPS requires it’s students to test an alternative design, they send them to that country (e.g. the Gripen) or borrow one. Maintaining such a non-standard design over a lengthy period would be quite expensive.
Where did this one come from? Ex-Russian or another source?
Why is that the case; what has happened to all these aircraft, scrapped? I would have thought that quantity was one of the strengths of Russian aviation?
The same reason as the USAF scrapped lots of B-52s – SALT, START and CFE agreements to scrap military equipment
Surprised nobody’s mentioned the Boscombe Down Mi-8s yet.
Possibly because they have gone to Afghanistan.
Doen’t RAFM have an IL-2 or IL-10 in restoration somewhere for the Milestones of Flight hall?
There are two with British civil registations (G-BZVW and G-BZVK) but I belive they are little more than wrecks.