Strange. My copy – Argus Books 1990 says £32.50 on the back cover.
I paid about a fiver remaindered IRRC.
So did mine!
Prices do vary, but generally over £150 for a copy seems the norm retail.
He is apparently working on a new edition.
I hadn’t realised the Aston books commanded such high prices either.
One I have is Kenneth West’s The Captive Luftwaffe from Putnam – I’ve seen them go for over £100 in good condition – even ex libris copies go for over £20 usually
I have heard stories about a Wellington “somewhere in Yorkshire”, and other non-specific airframes have been mentioned over the years.
Hi all,
The P38 on the beach proved that there are still interesting recoveries to be made as well as the major Wellington fuselage remains that were recovered a few years ago but have disspeared off the face of the earth (what’s the status on that).
Are there any possibilties still to be discovered?
Cheers
Cees
Several airframes in inaccessible bogs I beleive
I have sat in a P47 and Sea Fury cockpits and they are a different width between the canopy rails,
My point exactly
Hi
I’ve heard that the Hawker Typhoon and P47 Thunderbolt share the same basic (bubble) canopy. Now this seems a bit strange but knowing that the Malcolm hood was a British/US joint project used on several types i didn’t want to just dismiss the idea.
Have any of you heard of this, can you confirm or deny.Thanks
Ben
I’ve heard this many times – usually that it was ‘trialed’ in the UK. However, you just need to look at the two aircraft to see that whilst similar in shape, they are different – the P-47 being much wider IMO
One exhibit I really think is missing from RAF post-war collections, is a proper PV5 Neptune MR.1, as used by Coastal Command, and I would really like to see one here.
Isn’t there one of these (ex-RAF in original config) in the States? There was a few years back.
If it’s an aircraft in ‘Foreign’ hands, I’d go for the XV-6A at the Smithsonian.
For a ‘Foreign’ aircraft, a Brewster Buffalo
Effectively what you want is a colour and a B+W photo of the same aircraft – or an aircraft from the same batch
be interesting to know the rationale, but I can only see it losing them visitors.
Getting warmer! 🙂
Meant to say early 80s, not 90s! I’m away from home, so can’t look up any books etc – was it a Brough design?
Chaps, the question is nothing to do with the turboprop types rather what might have been. There was a stage when the jet idea was dropped and the air force decided on a turboprop trainer requirement instead.
So as a pre-cursor, the type in question was perhaps from the description similar to an Alpha Jet or AMX. I must confess I haven’t heard of it before… Any ideas?
Pub quiz 😉
There was, if I recall correctly, a ‘P’ series aircraft design from either Warton or Brough (or Kingston?!!!) in the early 90s for a basic Jet Trainer. Working from (failing) memory, it resembled a straight wing Hawk.
Maybe details in one of Tony Butler’s books?
And the fact that the RAFM scrapped some of these remains doesn’t count then?
🙁
Cees
Oh it does, but better than, say, the Boston recovered from Wales
Can do better than John!
http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1958/1958-1-%20-%200803.html
The majority of Flight back issues are now on line – searching is a little messy, but you can usually find what you want
Bloody tragic, the way RAFM leave that piled there doing nothing. 🙁
Less tragic than leaving it on the hill to be picked away by souvenier hunters and opportunists
Now, What did happen to the RAF’s Sea Vixens?
They cancelled them (allegedly because the high level tail & booms masked the engines, which made them no fun as target drones).
At least one non-drone did fly in RAF markings at one of the research establishments though (complete with fin flash)
Sources Ive read stated some of the ex RAF Neptunes were in use, Im hoping they are right and not just embelllished to make a nice story!
Falklands Neptunes were definitely the ex-US P2V-7s