dark light

DaveF68

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 1,578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Diamonds of your Aviation Library (boasting thread 2007) #1256217
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Strange. My copy – Argus Books 1990 says £32.50 on the back cover.

    I paid about a fiver remaindered IRRC.

    So did mine!

    Prices do vary, but generally over £150 for a copy seems the norm retail.

    He is apparently working on a new edition.

    I hadn’t realised the Aston books commanded such high prices either.

    One I have is Kenneth West’s The Captive Luftwaffe from Putnam – I’ve seen them go for over £100 in good condition – even ex libris copies go for over £20 usually

    DaveF68
    Participant

    I have heard stories about a Wellington “somewhere in Yorkshire”, and other non-specific airframes have been mentioned over the years.

    DaveF68
    Participant

    Hi all,

    The P38 on the beach proved that there are still interesting recoveries to be made as well as the major Wellington fuselage remains that were recovered a few years ago but have disspeared off the face of the earth (what’s the status on that).

    Are there any possibilties still to be discovered?

    Cheers

    Cees

    Several airframes in inaccessible bogs I beleive

    in reply to: Typhoon, Thunderbolt canopy question. #1256453
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I have sat in a P47 and Sea Fury cockpits and they are a different width between the canopy rails,

    My point exactly

    in reply to: Typhoon, Thunderbolt canopy question. #1258752
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Hi

    I’ve heard that the Hawker Typhoon and P47 Thunderbolt share the same basic (bubble) canopy. Now this seems a bit strange but knowing that the Malcolm hood was a British/US joint project used on several types i didn’t want to just dismiss the idea.
    Have any of you heard of this, can you confirm or deny.

    Thanks

    Ben

    I’ve heard this many times – usually that it was ‘trialed’ in the UK. However, you just need to look at the two aircraft to see that whilst similar in shape, they are different – the P-47 being much wider IMO

    in reply to: One per customer… #1258757
    DaveF68
    Participant

    One exhibit I really think is missing from RAF post-war collections, is a proper PV5 Neptune MR.1, as used by Coastal Command, and I would really like to see one here.

    Isn’t there one of these (ex-RAF in original config) in the States? There was a few years back.

    If it’s an aircraft in ‘Foreign’ hands, I’d go for the XV-6A at the Smithsonian.

    For a ‘Foreign’ aircraft, a Brewster Buffalo

    in reply to: Temperate Sea Camouflage #1260010
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Effectively what you want is a colour and a B+W photo of the same aircraft – or an aircraft from the same batch

    in reply to: Museum Of Army Flying #1261705
    DaveF68
    Participant

    be interesting to know the rationale, but I can only see it losing them visitors.

    in reply to: BAe Prototype Jet Trainer? #1266928
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Getting warmer! 🙂

    Meant to say early 80s, not 90s! I’m away from home, so can’t look up any books etc – was it a Brough design?

    in reply to: BAe Prototype Jet Trainer? #1267707
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Chaps, the question is nothing to do with the turboprop types rather what might have been. There was a stage when the jet idea was dropped and the air force decided on a turboprop trainer requirement instead.

    So as a pre-cursor, the type in question was perhaps from the description similar to an Alpha Jet or AMX. I must confess I haven’t heard of it before… Any ideas?

    Pub quiz 😉

    There was, if I recall correctly, a ‘P’ series aircraft design from either Warton or Brough (or Kingston?!!!) in the early 90s for a basic Jet Trainer. Working from (failing) memory, it resembled a straight wing Hawk.

    Maybe details in one of Tony Butler’s books?

    in reply to: Stirling EF494 and LK488 (plus BAe 146 Prototype) #1270463
    DaveF68
    Participant

    And the fact that the RAFM scrapped some of these remains doesn’t count then?
    🙁
    Cees

    Oh it does, but better than, say, the Boston recovered from Wales

    in reply to: "Flight" Magazine 21 Nov 1958 Page 809 #1270464
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Can do better than John!

    http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1958/1958-1-%20-%200803.html

    The majority of Flight back issues are now on line – searching is a little messy, but you can usually find what you want

    in reply to: Stirling EF494 and LK488 (plus BAe 146 Prototype) #1271502
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Bloody tragic, the way RAFM leave that piled there doing nothing. 🙁

    Less tragic than leaving it on the hill to be picked away by souvenier hunters and opportunists

    in reply to: G-CVIX Sea Vixen Status (merged) #1271508
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Now, What did happen to the RAF’s Sea Vixens?

    They cancelled them (allegedly because the high level tail & booms masked the engines, which made them no fun as target drones).

    At least one non-drone did fly in RAF markings at one of the research establishments though (complete with fin flash)

    in reply to: RAF Canberra Lost in Brazil? #1272877
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Sources Ive read stated some of the ex RAF Neptunes were in use, Im hoping they are right and not just embelllished to make a nice story!

    Falklands Neptunes were definitely the ex-US P2V-7s

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 1,578 total)