dark light

DaveF68

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,321 through 1,335 (of 1,578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: York/50's Trooping Flight Question… Bit of a long shot… #1279214
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Were they still using military serials for trooping flights in 1953? Might help identify it

    in reply to: Ditching Concordes #1289964
    DaveF68
    Participant

    How many successful ditchings of airliners/large jets have there been?

    The Nimrod in the Moray Firth is a rare exception

    in reply to: WW1 aircraft colour query #1295607
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I noticed was that the aeroplane nacelles were both doped blue. A little earlier in the programme we had been told that French soldier’s uniforms had been changed, early on in the conflict, from Revolution Red to blue.

    Was there, I wonder, anything more than coincidence in that French and British aeroplane fuselages were the same colour as their respective soldier’s uniforms ie blue and khaki(olive)?

    Roger Smith.

    Co-incidence.

    The nacelle is more of a blue grey, and this was probably only on Farmans – other types were other colours – much down to the treatment of the fabric (I recall a grey rubberised type was used early in the war) Later French a/c could have yellow, green/brown, aluminium or green/brown/ligh tbrown/black.

    British aircraft developed their khaki colour as the best defence against fabric rot through UV – colour was secondary.

    in reply to: Garden Use of Aircraft relics #1297567
    DaveF68
    Participant

    OTT, but one up on a gnome….and a puzzle for the ‘Roundel Police’.

    Mark

     http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/Mark12/Album%204/46-Cowlings-01-001.jpg

    Is the nose ex-RAF Middle East mk 18? Looks like the early 1950s ‘Desert’ cam scheme.

    in reply to: Garden Use of Aircraft relics #1297576
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Propstrike thanks for that pic, for those who have not read the story there are more pics and a rather shocking account of MOD attitudes from the pilot at…http://www.tintagelweb.co.uk/Tintagel%20Plane%20Crash.htm

    Talk about synchronicity….:

    Expert hands lifted me onto the deck, guided by one of the senior designers of the ejection seat who fortuitously happened to be a tourist fisherman on board.

    in reply to: Japanese/Indonesian puzzle (includes flying boat) #1314043
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I suspect the Mavis is the one that was marked up as ATAIU -SEA

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1314052
    DaveF68
    Participant

    The Australians decided against the TSR-2 becouse of the utter lack of faith put in it by elements of the British establishment. Had the political will and money been available to keep the project alive the requisite faith would have been shown and the RAAF would likely have not been persuaded against the type.

    The only thing tactical about the TSR-2 was the usage of the word in the name, to all intents and purposes this was a theater bomber. If the RAF’s V-force is no longer planning on making nuclear penetration missions into the Soviet Union beyond the range of the TSR-2 then there is no reason for it to still exist.

    Evidence? The link shows a primary source explanation from the Aussies that it was as much a geo-political decision and financial as to the capability of the aircraft.

    Note that the actual recommendation was for the RA-5C as this was available quicker!

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1315345
    DaveF68
    Participant

    A quick note maybe controversial point regarding TSR-2 exporting and Tornadoes. The Tornado was/is in roughly the same class as the Buccaneer, the TSR-2 was a different beast altogether (maybe part of its problem) it was an all out theater bomber, thus one may have had a hard time selling it to NATO allies. I suspect that Australia my have been the only buyer.

    The Australians decided against buying TSR2 before it was cancelled. (October 1963)

    http://groups.msn.com/TSR-2ResearchGroup/generaldynamicsf111k.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=1695

    http://groups.msn.com/TSR-2ResearchGroup/generaldynamicsf111k.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=1696

    http://groups.msn.com/TSR-2ResearchGroup/generaldynamicsf111k.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=1697

    The Vulcan may have continued as the TSR2 was designed as a tactical aircraft

    DaveF68
    Participant

    Sorry for keeping this thread Meteor:o
    Im sure DG202 did wear the brown, green and yellow scheme, as did other F.9/40s. I will have to dig through library to absolutely confirm.
    The Tamiya kit also depicts it in this scheme, they are very thorough in research and unlikely to get it wrong.
    BTW, I thought all British prototypes of the war used this colour scheme, am I wrong?

    Tamyia’s research was spot on -they modelled and illustrated the aircraft as it is depicted today. Unfortunately, both the colour scheme and the configuration are wrong for 1940s.

    The prototype colours were whatever was the designated scheme for that aircraft type, with yellow undersides.

    A similar situation existed with the Gloster Whittle – she was DG/DE when first flown, but late re-painted in Ocean Grey/Green. II’m not 100% sure she ever flew in green/brown with late war roundels as currently displayed.

    in reply to: 'The One that got Away' #1323638
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Doh! 😀 I’m sure that nosewheel wasn’t there yesterday! Even more interested to know what type it is now- anyone?

    I would say Hunter, a not uncommon type at Coley’s I beleive!

    in reply to: Vickers Vanguard ASW? #1326510
    DaveF68
    Participant

    An ASW version of the Vanguard was considered early in the Shackleton replacement programme.

    Nimrod model had transit on 4 jets for speed them patrol on two to maximise fuel burn/time on station.

    That was the model. They don’t turn engines off these days unless they have to!

    in reply to: German Aircraft in Allied Hands #1242315
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Interesting web site that. Cheers for posting. Some interesting piccies.

    Another good source of reference, for a first port of call regarding this subject is the following:

    Butler, P. H. (1977) Air Min: A Log of the ‘Air Min’ Numbered Aircraft. Merseyside Aviation Society Ltd (ISBN 0 902420 21 6).

    It’s out of print now (I bought mine years ago) but might crop up on Evil-Bay or Amazon. Although I haven’t looked recently, there’s bound be other good source material.

    Chris

    Much better is the authors later ‘War Prizes’ (1994) and War Prizes- The Album’ (2006).

    The 109 IS DG200 (now at Hendon of course)

    http://www.armyairforces.com/forum/upfiles/11968/asppg_Fy727759433.jpg

    in reply to: One for the 'Roundel Police' #1243388
    DaveF68
    Participant

    There were a lot of ex-German gliders used by Service Glider clubs in Germany post-war – much ex-NSFK (Hitler Youth Gliding!) equipment used

    There was one at Fassberg.
    Most seemed to carry the roundel on the rudder

    in reply to: Red Flag Vulcans #1248299
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Just to follow up on the Falklands Vulcans, all the Black Buck aircraft were still painted in the ‘old’ medium Sea Grey/Dark Green over Light Aircraft Grey scheme (iirc the wrap round ones were all 200 series engines, the BB bombers were 300 series).

    Given a coat of DSG underneath as LACG stood out like a sore thumb in a dark sky.

    in reply to: What happens after ZZ999? #1249507
    DaveF68
    Participant

    The serials system has gone a bit nuts since the C-17 team reserved ZZ171-9 (given an ‘out of range’ serial to signify the fact that they were on lease and not part of the RAF engineering inventory) since then we have has the 32 Squadron Agustas given ZR, the A-330Ms have ZM*** reserved, the HUnters, Reapers and Beech 350s in the ZZ range – and also had the AAC Defenders given unused serials in the ZG range first issued in the 80s – presumably to match the Islanders (actually the same happened for the third 32 Squadron Twin Squirrel)

    Prior to all this it was almost strictly in order (allowing for blackout blocks – and even they were abandoned during the ZH range)

    First ‘out of sequence’ serials were for the Hawk 200 – ZG200 and ZH200

Viewing 15 posts - 1,321 through 1,335 (of 1,578 total)