Those are L-bands for the su-35, shown at MAKS I think. The su-35 acts like a test and trainig platform for the T-50.

Is there any info will the second prototype get the AESA onboard or some electro optical stuff? Or the biggest reason of the delay increasing the rigidity of the airframe for the weapons load?

HAVELSAN has successfully exported the first Electronic Warfare Test and Training Range (EWTTR) – 12.01.2011

HAVELSAN has delivered the Electronic Warfare Test and Training Range System to Pakistan Air Force. In July 2010 acceptance tests were successfully completed and the guarantee period was started. The Electronic Warfare Test and Training Range ceremony was conducted on January 6, 2011 with the presence of Pakistan Air Force Commander Air Chief Marshall Rao Qamar Suleman, Deputy Commander of Pakistan Air Force Air Marshall Muhammad Hassan, Undersecretary of Turkish Defense Industry Murad Bayar, General Manager of Turkish Armed Forces Foundation Hayrettin Uzun, HAVELSAN Chairman of the Board Rasim Arslan, Deputy Undersecretary of National Defense Major General Nihat Kökmen, HAVELSAN General Manager Dr. Faruk A. Yarman, Head of International Cooperation of SSM Lütfi Varolu and other senior officials in Islamabad, Pakistan.

http://www.havelsan.com.tr/Basin/ENBasinDuyurulari.aspx

[ATTACH]191737[/ATTACH]

Courtesy of Faheka from militaryphotos

May be not under visible light, but in the case of the F 35 the HMD will show you whats directly under your seat even. The point is not losing track of enemy fighters who are blindspotted by the Canopt frame and the F 35 HMD can do that as well.

:diablo:

Hope to see it in a video! Which system creates the image for the pilot? Radar, sensors or camera?

I’m not fussed about the single piece canopy. It is heavy, and in the age of helmet mounted display it no longer offers much advantage.

Does HMD increase your view angle or informs you about necessary flight informations and for firing the weapons?

If you can get it off the shelf why not? 🙂
Also the third country supplier does not need to provide the same canopy, well they can’t due to ITAR and IP issues but they can use a modified process to make the canopy…

There was a F-22 thread on this forum where we discussed the F-22 canopy in great detail…

But J-20 seems like have the same canopy with the F-22. So in my opinion the supplier doesn’t want to annoy Lockheed Martin;) The most important part of creating one piece canopy should be its durability! And also its composition, design and the manufacturing technology must be the other most important parts! But later treatments can be done by time when you get a finished canopy! So in my opinion same manufacturer is not very sensible for today;)

Its clear that two pieces canopy effects the viewpoint of the pilot in a air combat! So it will be big suprise for me if it doesn’t get a single piece canopy…

edit: seems fake…

Agreed, both PAK-FA and the F-22 pictures every details are clear but on J-20 pictures nothing clear! In my opinion its impossible that all pictures photoshopped and we couldn’t see the weapons bay at none of them! Still I couldn’t see anything about the bays on the ultra extra perfect finished body of the bird!!