dark light

Smith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Smith
    Participant

    I am also unable to cavil at it.

    in reply to: Mosquito in formation with Lancaster in Canada #957462
    Smith
    Participant

    Brilliant. Great pics, superb line-up of aircraft, clearly a lovely day, Lanc, Mossie, Hurricane, FW190, ME262. Wow!

    in reply to: 2010 BBC Battle of Britain documentary (James Holland) #960391
    Smith
    Participant

    Yes … good points.

    Not the RAF at large, but instead Fighter Command.

    For clarity’s sake, the myth (as stated in the documentary) is that England was saved by the German switch in tactics from attacking the RAF to bombing London. I’ve heard similar statements … the RAF (read Fighter Command) was down to it’s last “X” men etc. But the documentary argues that (I shall avoid saying “the RAF’s” and say) England’s defences were by no means exhausted (I think of the approach of Sir Keith Park, in essence a story of marshalling/managing resources) and that had the German tactics not changed, the outcome would have been the same.

    For example, the documentary talks of the rotational policy (and actions) in place to rest and recuperate squadrons, bring that together with Park’s approach, and CD’s observation in final para above, and the argument is further supported.

    Smith
    Participant

    Interesting thread.

    Very …

    Smith
    Participant

    … his cited trip of September 6/7. 1941 …

    Further to this, although that night saw an operation to Huls, the very next night 7/8 Sep ’41 saw an operation to Berlin on which 10 Stirlings (plus other aircraft) operated (that’s possibly a single squadron) and two were lost. This from Middlebrook/Everitt’s BCWD mentioned in my post above. Someone with access to Chorley will be able to confirm to you if Pape was one of those shot down that night.

    Smith
    Participant

    Stirlings to Berlin

    According to sources I have read, Stirlings went to Berlin only twice; April 17-18, 1941 and 22-23 November http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_short_stirling_bomber.html Neither of these corresponds to his cited trip of September 6/7. 1941!

    Ah no … Stirlings flew as part of the Bomber Force right into the Battle of Berlin in late 1943 … in fact it was that Battle that was their swansong o/a loss rates and sufficient numbers of Lancasters (primarily) and Halifaxes being available to replace them. Refer for example to “Forever Strong” (the Story of 75 Sqdn) by Norman Franks and also the Bomber Command War Diaries by Middlebrook & Everitt.

    That said, the night of 6/7 Sept 1941 saw a raid on the Hulls/Huels synthetic oil plant … I don’t know where that was.

    Interesting thread.

    in reply to: Req old airfield #965317
    Smith
    Participant

    Click on NewForest’s link and it shows you Oriented North.

    Yep, thanks … also Wikipedia has the answer to much of my question, see here (text) and here (pic)

    in reply to: Req old airfield #965351
    Smith
    Participant

    Describe the layout please

    Great photo … just out of general interest, can someone please describe the layout? NSWE? Which is the main runway? What are the semi and fully circular shapes near the bottom of the photo (dispersals?). Are any of the visible buildings of the era? Thanks D

    in reply to: Grumman Avenger with two highball bombs #983126
    Smith
    Participant

    I didn’t know that – learn something very day. And they changed it back again? A-10 Warthog and various others?

    in reply to: 1943 Lancaster loss #983272
    Smith
    Participant

    Theo Boiten (Nachtjagd War Diaries vol 1) agrees 3 Lancasters lost, two bought down into the sea by Flak @ Wilhelmshaven, and 106 Sqdn Lancaster LM303 claimed by Oblt. Paul Zorner.

    cheers Don

    in reply to: Grumman Avenger with two highball bombs #983321
    Smith
    Participant

    in 1945 an A26 was an A26

    Sorry, can you explain “dissed” please?

    … not a B26. That was my point. I was being pedantic. Bit of a pet hate re the change of ID for the B26. Come war’s end the IMHO excellent B26 (Marauder) was summarily melted down and the A26 became the B26 … for no good reason! And therefore yes dissed = disrespected.

    The US highball trials were conducted with an A26 Invader – not a B26 Invader.

    Closely eyeballing those videos I’d say the highball bomb itself cut right through the fueslage.

    cheers Don

    in reply to: Grumman Avenger with two highball bombs #984315
    Smith
    Participant

    B26 Invader.

    Dave

    That’ll be an A26 Invader.
    http://napoleon130.tripod.com/id725.html

    Always annoyed me the way the US dissed (IMHO) the B26

    in reply to: General Discussion #236412
    Smith
    Participant

    Conversion rip off!

    And on the pounds shillings and pence thing. I remember as a wee lad feeling might ripped off when we went decimal here in NZ (’67).

    Jaffas and things like that were 5 a penny. 5 x 12 = 60 so you got 60 for a shilling. Along came decimal currency and the shilling became 10 cents. But did we get 6 jaffas a cent? Oh no, they were 5 a cent.

    in reply to: Mathematicians to the fore please #1836605
    Smith
    Participant

    Conversion rip off!

    And on the pounds shillings and pence thing. I remember as a wee lad feeling might ripped off when we went decimal here in NZ (’67).

    Jaffas and things like that were 5 a penny. 5 x 12 = 60 so you got 60 for a shilling. Along came decimal currency and the shilling became 10 cents. But did we get 6 jaffas a cent? Oh no, they were 5 a cent.

    in reply to: General Discussion #236415
    Smith
    Participant

    Base 5 in real life

    Will it ever be used in real life?

    You know, I realised a couple of hours back that I use base 5 every now and then … when I’m counting things in (or as they pass me, or I collect them etc.).

    You know that technique with a pencil, or a knife and a tree trunk, of counting things in blocks of 5? Four vertical strokes and then one that crosses through it. I can’t do it here, there’s no strikethrough format tool.

    You end up with blocks of 5 and a few leftovers. Of course we’re very quick at converting the 5’s into base 10. Say we’ve counted 23 things (kids, sheep, spitfires, whatever). Oh, there’s four blocks of 5, that’s twenty … plus three, means there’s twenty three. etc.

    In base 5 it is ever so quicker, four of them plus three is instantly recognisable as 43.

    cheers

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,284 total)