dark light

Smith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stuka pilot's 70 year reunion. #953675
    Smith
    Participant

    Excellent – thanks for that. D

    in reply to: Me 410 engine run? #953803
    Smith
    Participant

    Thank you Ian … very much appreciated. What a great experience that must have been.

    Many thanks Don

    in reply to: Definitive Hawker Hurricane Book? #958266
    Smith
    Participant

    The Frank Mason book. Amongst the 30 or so Hurricane books in my collection that one stands head and shoulders above the rest.

    Is that “Hawker Hurricane” by Francis K Mason?

    in reply to: History In A Couple of Weeks Time! #969430
    Smith
    Participant

    She’s a beaut

    What an amazing photograph … well done to the AU Dept of Defence for marking the passing so eloquently.

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #996724
    Smith
    Participant

    Success?

    I’ve always been under the impression that the event described here is regarded as the first successful (i.e. resulting in shoot-down of enemy aeroplane) radar guided interception:-

    A bit more detail here:-

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=23890

    Now that’s an interesting thread … thanks for pointing it out.

    Clearly there were a lot of interceptions going on … as to whether it’s necessary to shoot down an enemy aircraft to anoint an interception with the term “success”, I wouldn’t say so … but that’s a moot point.

    Thanks

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #997759
    Smith
    Participant

    Well … according to Wikipedia :rolleyes: under the entry on “nightfighter” it may be via an experimental fitting in a Fairey Battle in the late 30’s ( see the last para under inter-war years). But I don’t see that as definitive.

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #997790
    Smith
    Participant

    Back on topic if I may

    ?… [the night of 19/20 Nov 1940] was the first successful Beaufighter radar-guided interception, but at least it is still proof that the 1943 was NOT “the first” ever.

    Hmmm … anyone care to venture what was the first ever radar-guided interception?

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #998026
    Smith
    Participant

    TaVM

    Thank you Bager1968! cheers Don

    in reply to: 70 years ago – 28.06.42 – RIP F/Sgt Dennis Copping #999365
    Smith
    Participant

    It’s about the relative rarity of the two events

    Please accept these remarks as an objective comment on shepsair’s “Kittyhawk vs Copping” observation near the top of this thread. In so doing I mean no disrespect whatsoever to F/Sgt Copping and the many others who gave their lives in WWII. My Uncle included.

    Many many tens of thousands (it must be well into the hundreds of thousands) of airmen gave their lives in WWII … if we remarked on the 70th anniversary of each of those deaths we’d be lost in the sheer volume.

    By way of contrast, the finding of the Kittyhawk, inanimate though it may be, is/was an exceptionally rare event.

    So, without commenting on the relative “humanity” of the two perspectives, it’s fairly easy to see why they have attracted such divergent levels of attention.

    That F/Sgt Copping has been remembered here at all is to my mind a very fine thing. May he rest in peace.

    Regards Don

    in reply to: Hydraulic Recuperators #999500
    Smith
    Participant

    Spoilsport 😎

    I saw the title “hydraulic recuperator” and thought in a Pythonesque way it could be all manner of useful gadgets!

    in reply to: Messerschmitt in a wind tunnel, 1940 #1015985
    Smith
    Participant

    Where?

    That’s a serious wind tunnel … where is/was it? Don

    in reply to: Is this a Blenheim Mk V? #1017044
    Smith
    Participant

    Other photos?

    ?.. the series of photos were, I believe, captioned as being attacked by Blenheims. I didn’t win/get the photos that stated this, but have been given this information from the bidder who did win the other photos …

    A series of photos? Do any of the others show aircraft?

    My view so far is JU88 or 188 based on the overall perspective of the various dimensions and the long annular nacelles. Tail is unfortunately badly blurred/vague.

    Don

    in reply to: Ever wondered what a bomber stream sounded like? #952207
    Smith
    Participant

    Thank you for this … much appreciated. Don

    in reply to: Is it me or do we need more warbird only airshows? #977013
    Smith
    Participant

    It’s you.

    Yup

    in reply to: Yesterday Channel – "Who Betrayed the Bomber Boys" #977015
    Smith
    Participant

    …..it may be my life’s work! 😉

    Having inhabited this forum for many years I would say that’s quite likely, and this is the old thrasher this one.

    Like CD but less so, I’ve studied this for many years and formed then reformed my opinions. I think:
    – Bomber Command did a pretty good job overall (yes that’s qualified).
    – I have the utmost respect and admiration for the crews – they did an amazing job under terrifying circumstances.
    – I have the utmost respect for the German defense personnel – they did an amazing job under terrifying circumstances.
    – I think Dresden was unnecessary – I doubt it took a day off the war.
    – It was by no means the first or most horrific such event. The camps aside, we and our Allies gave rather better in that regard than we received – but let’s face it was an all out war the like of which we’d all rather not see.
    – I am appalled at the disrespect shown to Bomber Command until very very recently.
    – I find Churchill’s distancing of himself repugnant.

    Don

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,284 total)