Excellent – thanks for that. D
Thank you Ian … very much appreciated. What a great experience that must have been.
Many thanks Don
The Frank Mason book. Amongst the 30 or so Hurricane books in my collection that one stands head and shoulders above the rest.
Is that “Hawker Hurricane” by Francis K Mason?
She’s a beaut
What an amazing photograph … well done to the AU Dept of Defence for marking the passing so eloquently.
Success?
I’ve always been under the impression that the event described here is regarded as the first successful (i.e. resulting in shoot-down of enemy aeroplane) radar guided interception:-
A bit more detail here:-
Now that’s an interesting thread … thanks for pointing it out.
Clearly there were a lot of interceptions going on … as to whether it’s necessary to shoot down an enemy aircraft to anoint an interception with the term “success”, I wouldn’t say so … but that’s a moot point.
Thanks
Well … according to Wikipedia :rolleyes: under the entry on “nightfighter” it may be via an experimental fitting in a Fairey Battle in the late 30’s ( see the last para under inter-war years). But I don’t see that as definitive.
Back on topic if I may
?… [the night of 19/20 Nov 1940] was the first successful Beaufighter radar-guided interception, but at least it is still proof that the 1943 was NOT “the first” ever.
Hmmm … anyone care to venture what was the first ever radar-guided interception?
TaVM
Thank you Bager1968! cheers Don
It’s about the relative rarity of the two events
Please accept these remarks as an objective comment on shepsair’s “Kittyhawk vs Copping” observation near the top of this thread. In so doing I mean no disrespect whatsoever to F/Sgt Copping and the many others who gave their lives in WWII. My Uncle included.
Many many tens of thousands (it must be well into the hundreds of thousands) of airmen gave their lives in WWII … if we remarked on the 70th anniversary of each of those deaths we’d be lost in the sheer volume.
By way of contrast, the finding of the Kittyhawk, inanimate though it may be, is/was an exceptionally rare event.
So, without commenting on the relative “humanity” of the two perspectives, it’s fairly easy to see why they have attracted such divergent levels of attention.
That F/Sgt Copping has been remembered here at all is to my mind a very fine thing. May he rest in peace.
Regards Don
Spoilsport 😎
I saw the title “hydraulic recuperator” and thought in a Pythonesque way it could be all manner of useful gadgets!
Where?
That’s a serious wind tunnel … where is/was it? Don
Other photos?
?.. the series of photos were, I believe, captioned as being attacked by Blenheims. I didn’t win/get the photos that stated this, but have been given this information from the bidder who did win the other photos …
A series of photos? Do any of the others show aircraft?
My view so far is JU88 or 188 based on the overall perspective of the various dimensions and the long annular nacelles. Tail is unfortunately badly blurred/vague.
Don
Thank you for this … much appreciated. Don
It’s you.
Yup
…..it may be my life’s work! 😉
Having inhabited this forum for many years I would say that’s quite likely, and this is the old thrasher this one.
Like CD but less so, I’ve studied this for many years and formed then reformed my opinions. I think:
– Bomber Command did a pretty good job overall (yes that’s qualified).
– I have the utmost respect and admiration for the crews – they did an amazing job under terrifying circumstances.
– I have the utmost respect for the German defense personnel – they did an amazing job under terrifying circumstances.
– I think Dresden was unnecessary – I doubt it took a day off the war.
– It was by no means the first or most horrific such event. The camps aside, we and our Allies gave rather better in that regard than we received – but let’s face it was an all out war the like of which we’d all rather not see.
– I am appalled at the disrespect shown to Bomber Command until very very recently.
– I find Churchill’s distancing of himself repugnant.
Don