WW you are obviously being trolled. This entire line of reasoning is silly at best.
if continuous curvature was not as good as 30 year old signals management tactics then the USAF would still fly around in F-117 like platforms. It is obvious from the F-35s design that stealth takes precedent over every thing else. So if a purely faceted surface is better, then the F-35 would have it. Why fool with facets when you can have a better signature + aerodynamics in the same package. this is silly!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZrvAFRhQZc&feature=player_embedded

F-35 JSF infrared sensor tracks rocket launch

Turkey confirms 2011 F-35 orders. 100 planned.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-14689.html
The original post is in Turkish if someone would like to translate.

Take it easy.
In a few years, half of the european airforces will fly the F35. And many of them will spend weeks on french air bases during TLP, tiger meets and many other nato or non nato trainings.
So half a dozen of british F-35 on the Charles de Gaulle in 2020 will make no difference.

If I were you I would me be more concerned about the jsf sold to Israel :rolleyes:

Edited for whining
Maybe the French could become small diameter bomb customers?

I for 1 cannot wait to see the euro-fighter versus the Su series aircraft.
It will finally prove who made the correct design choices. canard versus TV.
Who has the better radar and tactics. I am giddy

You cant talk military sharing of bases and facilities without some measure of tech exposure. You don’t see my side?

I was simply bringing up the issue of tech security with the F-35 aboard french ships. this is perfectly on topic. it only went out in left field when fan-boys got there panties in a bunch because I educated them on past U.S. policy.