dark light

richw_82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster PA474 spar boom replacement #797885
    richw_82
    Participant

    Sorry, I wasn’t trying to suggest anything untoward, and I’ve not missed the point.

    You just said you had some of the remaining drawings, not what they were or where they were from. Last I spoke to BAE – about the Shackleton re-spar works – they said they’d not got anything remaining from the Lancaster re-spar themseleves, it had all gone. Even the centre section jig had been scrapped. It might be worth you talking to the Avro Heritage guys as I bet they’d love to see anything you have.

    in reply to: Lancaster PA474 spar boom replacement #797891
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi, I was the Team leader on this project and have photos and some of the remaining drawings from the project if that helps? You will need to give me some more specific information in order that I can help more. A large subject! 🙂

    Interesting – I thought all the remaining drawings had gone back to BAE, as a lot was supplied from the Shackleton archive drawings; what with Shackleton material being used and the similarities in the wing.

    in reply to: VTTS Hard Facts Finally Coming Home To Roost? #806815
    richw_82
    Participant

    They must have changed their mind as I got invited to submit a project enquiry, and first round application for the Shackleton. As things stand I passed it on to someone else to complete, then everything hit the fan for other reasons. I got told a straight up restoration to flight isn’t going to get funded but one with educational and other aspects will. This was during 2015 so I can’t claim its still the case.

    Regards

    Rich

    in reply to: Lancaster wheel in derelict museum? #808418
    richw_82
    Participant

    Aren’t the Hastings Mainwheel / Tyre assemblies same ones as Halifax used ? If so, thats 2 around UK now not being used in a Project. Just saying lol !!

    Cheers guys , over and out.

    Bill T.

    Hastings wheels are the same as later Lancaster, Licoln, York, Shackleton, Tudor.. the only variance being in the size of the brake drum and brake units. From browsing a few photos it looks like the later Halifax/Halton got the same wheels at some point.

    in reply to: Nimrod XV232 #814860
    richw_82
    Participant

    You will, I’ll be manning the Engineers panel on the runs – so prior to that I’ll be fussing around the aircraft somewhere.

    in reply to: Nimrod XV232 #814955
    richw_82
    Participant

    Message back from the Nimrod team – they’re looking into the website and why its down.

    in reply to: Nimrod XV232 #814962
    richw_82
    Participant

    I’m heading down to Coventry all being well for the Shackleton taxy run, I was also hoping too have a look round the Nimrod, I saw on their website last week they had to cancel the planned engine run at the weekend, and I’ve been trying to get on the site today and it’s disappeared!
    Has anyone any idea what’s happened? I do hope all their efforts haven’t gone down the drain, it would be nice to see her taxy, which they did have planned.

    Hi,

    I’m not sure what’s happened to the website, it could be a glitch that needs reporting to the Nimrod team webmaster type chap. The planned engine run was cancelled purely due to a paperwork/admin issue – there’s no other issues be it serviceability or otherwise. They will be running soon.

    The Nimrod team will be on site on our taxy day, would love to have visitors, and have promised us they’ll have the galley open on board XV232 for any that turn up. :eagerness:

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: A-W Meteor NF.14 WS788 Restoration Thread #815838
    richw_82
    Participant

    Today was our first working day of the year, well it was for those of us not let down by Japanese technology anyway!

    Honda; the power of dreams. Todays flat bed trailer supplied by LDV. Sorry I failed to make it chaps.

    in reply to: Information Request- Griffon Magnetos #821244
    richw_82
    Participant

    I have some information; though I’ll have to check what it covers. There may be overhaul details in the manuals we have at Coventry.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #822994
    richw_82
    Participant

    Thanks Rich,
    Just a thing, you may or may not be able to answer this, talking to a good friend last night regarding the project, he donated money to SPT, and the hanger appeal through the website, he was wondering if this money gets transferred over to yourselves or if it stays with SPT until its fate is decided? Hes not on here hence the question.
    Thanks.

    I don’t think any money with SPT can be transferred; there are some Charities Commission rules regarding this. I’m not well enough informed to say what can or can’t happen if the SPT got wound up – sorry.

    I am sure that I do not need to say this, but I will anyway; we at Gatwick Aviation Museum fully support your efforts and will help out wherever we can. It’s just a shame we are so far apart.

    Good luck with your efforts. We will be going through some of our spares stock soon and know we have some Mk2 stuff, let you know and you’re welcome to what we find.

    Thanks Peter, you know as ever we’ll be there to help you guys and WR982 “Juliet” as much as we can. You’re right about the distance – if we had both aircraft at a similar location I can only imagine how well they would both do, and what a sound eight Griffons would make..

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #823787
    richw_82
    Participant

    Actions do indeed speak louder, and I’ve always tried to answer truthfully on here and in person about what’s going on with the Shackleton be it good bad or ugly.

    I can’t correct anything to do with SPT’s statements or public information, as I’m not part of SPT. What’s left of it is down to the two Trustees – Dave Woods and Druid Petrie. Anything that happens with the Trust now has to be decided by them, assuming it is left relatively intact after the Charities Commission finish with it. Its why I’ve had to cut off from talking about SPT on the forums and on the Facebook pages – as now the Trust isn’t responsible for the aircraft, I have no interest in its fate.

    I’m working purely to deliver a serviceable aircraft all year, do more restoration work on her, and fundraise to keep my little teams efforts in the black. I have the preservation of WR963 as my focus – not the charity or its administrative issues. Keep watching, as I intend to deliver on my part of things!

    It’ll be great if we do see you at the taxy run in January, as I said you will be more than welcome.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #824256
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi Merlin85;

    I’ll try and answer as best I can.

    I’ve not said SPT is dormant, its just not involved in WR963’s maintenance or operation. Not only was there the issues with some of the members of that Trust and the direction they were taking, there was discussion (some of it ongoing) with the Charities Commission as to whether the focus on WR963 was meeting the Trusts objects properly, in that the Trust exists for the ‘advancement of the education of the public in military aviation history, by the preservation and display on the air and on the ground of Shackleton and other military and historical aircraft.’ rather than the restoration to flight of Avro Shackleton WR963. It remains for the Charities Commission to decide what will happen in due course, but with less than the required number of Trustees and no sign of any resolution with those that make up its membership, its likely SPT will get wound up.

    The website currently has no webmaster, and I will be investigating if and why the button on there is still live – it shouldn’t be. The website was started by me a few years ago and went through several revamps, and several webmasters, before returning to my control about a month ago.

    The Trust don’t own WR963, and never have. The aircraft went frm RAF ownership, to David Liddell-Grainger, to Air Atlantique, to my father – Dave Woods. As you can see in the pdf document you posted the link to the statement “The Shackleton aircraft which is the subject of Trust activities is not owned by the Trust.” is in there. The CAA registration was filed by my Father, who is Chairman of the Trust, the registration document being his name but registered to the Shackleton Preservation Trust due to their activitie taking place on the aircraft. Accurate at the time, now soon to be changed when SPT’s future is clear; and the CAA were happy at that when they queried the accuracy and what was intended back in October.

    There are some spares held by the Trust, but not those held off site. You will not get six Rolls Royce Griffons and a barn full of other airframe bits valued at £9k, as is listed as the Trusts assets in 2012…! What isn’t available online are the end of year reports, which more accurately explain fixed assets and such – they state what the Trust holds for itself, and more importantly what are held on behalf of other people for use on WR963 or achieving the objects of the Trust. A lot of the tools, the MR1/T4 nose, and many other parts are privately owned. Rather importantly the Trust does hold the Design Rights and drawing archive, though the contract states that they go back to BAE if anything happens that means they can’t be cared for.

    The sale of the engine was a deal done by SPT on behalf of the owners at the time (Air Atlantique) for a time expired engine to come off WR963 and go to Dubai, and a new engine from the parts stock (also Air Atlantique’s at that time) to go on the aircraft. There was a deal at the time which would see all the work undertaken by SPT, including manpower installing the engine in Dubai, and any profit from the sale would come back to SPT. As a lot of this happened before I started working on WR963 I’m not exactly sure of who got what for why.

    Kickstarter was set up and run by me, and you can still find it on their platform. I didn’t do it for the Trust I did it as a private individual and you’ll see in their guidance you can’t raise money for a charity. The only mention on there of SPT is my thankyou message, as it would have helped the Trust see WR963 fly. The money is still sat waiting to be used on NDT, as I’ve kicked off more than once if ANYONE (SPT/maintenance team…anyone!) has dared to suggest using it for anything else. The hangar appeal I have no idea about as I left WR963/SPT in November last year and only returned recently to stop the whole thing collapsing.

    A badly run charity, particularly in the last year or so. Which is why despite the good parts over the years I won’t be sad if SPT gets wound up.

    As things stand –

    SPT may end up getting wound up, as its current structure prevents it form operating in accordance with Charities Commission guidelines, or its own Trust Deed. So while not dormant, its pretty much a spent force.

    Avro Shackelton WR963 and her spares were purchased by my father, Dave Woods from Air Atlantique in 2012. The SPT Trustees at the time were unwilling to take on the liability of the aircraft as it looked as though the Airport was closing and the ‘Airbase’ museum was moving to Cornwall. WR963 would have to survive on its own, something they didn’t think could be done. Dave took the gamble, and saved the aircraft. So far despite your comment that things are poorly run, he’s not done a too bad job given that the aircraft is still in one piece and in better condition now than it was.

    Avro Shackleton WR963 is running as a privately owned aircraft, with all the pitfalls that come along with it. No tax free donations, gift aid, nothing. But there’s nothing saying we can’t sell places on taxy runs, or on ground run ups, or charge the public to come and crawl all over her. Similarly there’s nothing saying we can’t sell any merchandise we create or buy.

    There is a team of very good friends that nursed WR963 back to health from 2009 – 2014 back on the scene making sure that come hell or high water the aircraft will survive. She might even fly. If it has to be funded purely out of our own pockets then so be it. There’s nobody asking you to put money in a bowl, but if you want a ride with the engines running, you’ll have to pay for it. Fuel isn’t free. Its that simple.

    Come down to Coventry whether you choose to help financially or not. Have a look at the aircraft and be welcome.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #824876
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi,

    You’re more than welcome to come on board for a taxy ride – I’m still waiting for the last few details on pricing/entry etc. The team looking after WR963 are not a registered charity (we’re just a bunch of good friends continung the work on the aircraft), as what’s left of SPT is no longer involved with things. Again, its something that is being worked on.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #825277
    richw_82
    Participant

    They will be available to the public, just as the few that were carried out back in April were.

    I believe most of the problems are now sorted to a large extent, and the current team are still working on building things up to make this year better than the last. The goal is constant progress with the aircraft; and whatever issues arise that is the focus at all times.

    I’ve seen new parts coming in such as bombsights and turret parts, and there’s rumblings about getting the full length bomb doors (finally) done, so I’m looking forward to next year!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #825311
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi all,

    I’ll be posting an update shortly as I’ve been waiting for some more details, but as Mark says – WR963 will be taxying on 28 January, and another date at the end of February with planning also in progress for more of the same in March and beyond. She is going to be getting some proper exercise this year!

    Regards,

    Rich

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,736 total)