dark light

Aeronut

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: W.W.II weather 'forecasts' #1272896
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Try looking for a copy of Forecast for Overloard by JM Stagg published by Ian Allen in 1971 (SBN 7110 0251 7).
    Group Capt Stagg was the met man that advised Eisenhower so it should be reasonbly accurate (If that can be said of any met man).
    It contains the synoptics for June 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 1944.

    in reply to: Powered Waco CG-4A?? #1307695
    Aeronut
    Participant

    I have some info (somewhere) on the GAL design for the ‘New medium glider’ that was to replace the Horsa. I’ve even talked to the Glider Pilot Regiment chap who advised them on the cockpit layout in the mock up. When I first saw the sketch of it I thought Beverley – pod and boom fuselage, fixed / struted tricycle u/c, side by side pilots above cargo hold with clamshell doors front and rear, and twin fins.
    It would have gone into production but like all the assault gliders 1950 saw then going in a defence cut.

    in reply to: Cosford Cold War exhibition #1312139
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Aren’t all the exhibits going to get covered in overspray when the finnaly get round to painting the ceiling (if a building that shape has such a thing)? Surely they are not going to leave the steel structure in red lead primer and the cladding in its raw state. Its a good thing that we are getting photos posted now cos it looks like its going to be impossible when the shed is finished.

    in reply to: Imperial War Museum North – Bomber Command Exhibition #1316962
    Aeronut
    Participant

    The whole museum is a triumph of form over function. Atmospheric lighting, minimal exhibits and radical (aweful) architecture do not a museum make.
    The Bomber Command exhibition is definately a Curate’s egg. The videos of the training films were facinating as were some of the photographs. The breifing models laked descriptions (I was left wanting to know more about the Peenemunda one). Considering Manchester’s part in the production of the bombers there was only a passing mention and even then Metro Vicks got more of a mention than did AVRO’s, was this dispaly put together by someone in London?
    All I can say is that I’ve now been to IWMN and it didn’t cost anything and I wont be returning, if I had to pay I’d have been asking for my money back.
    The IWMN isn’t alone, I have a dislike at what they have done to the RAF Museum(they’d lost the plot even before Milestones), I positively hate the pro America hang the rest attitude of Duxford and have serious doubts about hanging aircraft at Cosford but I know I’ll still go back to those.

    in reply to: London Science Museum – Aviation #1317908
    Aeronut
    Participant

    The engine in the Roe 1 triplane isn’t the original either. As strange as it may seem the original is in the Replica airframe in Manchester

    in reply to: Auster AGM and Fly-in #400402
    Aeronut
    Participant

    No I’ll defend the B4 as well. Its one of the two Auster types I’d like to see the other being the Type G? glider. (anyone got a Mk 1 or III without an engine going spare)

    in reply to: Auster AGM and Fly-in #400406
    Aeronut
    Participant

    [Auster must be the only manufacturer who has managed to make all of their products good looking!]

    M’lud to prove the falsehood of that statement the prosecution would like to present the Agricola to the jury.

    in reply to: Vintage Gliders #1332311
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Turning the engine off in flight is the best part – especially if you’re giving a ride to a helicopter pilot…… and you don’t tell him you’re going to do it

    in reply to: Vintage Gliders #1334747
    Aeronut
    Participant

    My first glider flight in 1970 was also my first flight in anything smaller than a Viscount. It was from RAF Burtonwood and the moment before launch was captured by a photographer for the Manchester Evening News – You try and smile for the camera when scared stiff. The photo of the landing shows me having a toothy grin.
    There then followed a solo course at Sealand with lift provided by the adjacent steelworks. At Sealand I knew no better and thought that flying 6 feet above another Sedburgh in cloud was fun – Oh the inocence of youth.
    Finally I found myself working at an RAF airfield when a VGS was moved in and I voulunteered as a Civilian Instructor. During the two years we operated the Wooden conventionals (T21 and Mk 3 Brick) I was called Sir by Prince Edward! Reported for low flying in a Mk 3 by the Captain of the Queens Flight – Impressive as the glider was on a trailer behind a LandRover at the time!!! nad took my first passenger up in VX275 the oldest Sedburgh in the Cadets. We knew 275 as ‘Mrs Hepple’ as it had been presented by a Mrs F D Hepple, it was officially named Venture which of course wsa the type it wsa replaced with. VX275 is now part of the RAF Museum’s collection at Stafford. 16 years flying Venture and Vigilants later I still had fond memories of the Barge and then I made the mistake of taking a trip in one at Hadenham apart from the strange sensation of flying below the stall speeds I had now become used to I’ll swear that the ailerons weren’t connected.
    I do hope that one day Mrs Hepple will go on display.

    in reply to: Bristol Britannia was made where? #1271586
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Britannias were also built by Shorts & Harland in Belfast (and the wing was re-utilised in the Shorts Belfast of course).

    This re-use of the wing is evident in the documents I have originating from the Army that refer to the ‘new’ Aerial Delivery! aircarft as the ‘Britannic’ the acompanying picture is decidedly the Belslow.

    in reply to: to good to be forgotten #1296019
    Aeronut
    Participant

    The request for typos reminded me of the bit in an accident report I came across at Middle Wallop. Basically the Driver Airframe of a Chipmunk got it wrong and took a wing off his innocent airframe by hitting the runway control vehicle. The report then said “the aircraft became inverted and slid for a further 100 years”.
    After drying my eyes from laughing so much I noticed the vehicle’s registration in the report’s photograph – the vehicle still exists and is part of the Museums collection. Now where’s that Chipmunk shaped stencil and the black paint there’s a Commer’s door that needs it’s kill marking applied.
    As to forgotten aircraft heros my vote would go for the AVRO Anson the RAF’s first MRCA.

    in reply to: Specs for tow rope used to tow Hamilcar gliders? #1306488
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Deryck, I was quoting from the report and the dimensions were expressed as Circumferences (a bit odd these days), for diameters you need to divide by Pi. Therefore a 4 1/4 circumference is only 1.353 inches in diameter, which is far more realistic. Apologies for the maths lecture.
    Ropes were indeed spliced and whip corded (bound). Indeed in the early days AFEE had a sailor as part of the establishment to do the splicing.

    in reply to: Abingdon Fayre Air & Country Show 2006-PRESS RELEASE #1311093
    Aeronut
    Participant

    I’ve been informed that Abingdon’s resident Vigilants will not be flying on Sunday so if you’re desperate to see one in the air you’ll need to turn up a day early.

    Aeronut
    Participant

    Melvyn, As I thought nice tale for the bar …… but if photographic evidence appears.
    Makes you wonder about the other stories he’s told me, some of which have been repeated in print!

    in reply to: Specs for tow rope used to tow Hamilcar gliders? #1313936
    Aeronut
    Participant

    Having written the above comment I’ve delved into my archive and found a copy of the Airborne Forces Experimental Establishment Repot E13 dated 18 August 1947 entitled Interim report on an investigation of tye suitability of Nylon for use in glider tow cables.

    The report gives the following information. Nylon tow ropes for Horsa II were 2 7/8 inch circumference and 145 cwt breaking strength. Hamilcar I nylon tow ropes were 3 1/2 inch circumference and 200 cwt breaking strength. Hamilcar X nylon tow ropes were 3 5/8 inch circumference and 240 cwt.

    The ‘standard’ hemp ropes were 3 3/8 inch circumference, 120 cwt for Horsa II and 4 1/4 inch, 200 cwt for Hamilcar I.

    There is a short length of the tow rope used to tow the Waco Hadrian ‘Voo Doo’ across the Atlantic on display in the Museum at Middle Wallop – Its 1 inch diameter and Nylon.

    Hope this helps.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 147 total)