dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: First Casualty Of New Ins. Rules.. #1408640
    dhfan
    Participant

    Don’t take it personally, Planejunky. I asume John is referring to what I think of as the London Borough of Camden viewpoint.

    On that basis John, the word you were looking for was sandal. Sandle as a word, to the best of my knowledge (and the only dictionary I have to hand) doesn’t exist. Was it a Micro$oft spill chucker?

    Planejunky’s valid objections noted, I agree with John. Some people do genuinely like opera, my brother in law included. However, I’m convinced that most people go because they think it will impress others. How much did the Lottery Fund give to the Royal Opera House and the South Bank tent? A little perspective is in order in my opinion.

    in reply to: HP in a heli…DUCK!! #1412591
    dhfan
    Participant

    As I was 53 a couple of months ago I’m beginning to wonder whether I should be talking to you nasty rude lot.

    in reply to: HP in a heli…DUCK!! #1412816
    dhfan
    Participant

    Thanks for that Maarvin. I’ll make sure I show it to Mum next time she’s here. For some strange reason, she doesn’t have email. 🙂

    in reply to: Questions on B-17 #1413395
    dhfan
    Participant

    A possibility certainly, but I would have thought the RAF rather than the USAAF would have been approached first.

    Anything to do with the B.17 being low wing and having a virtually flat centre-section? All the British heavy bombers were mid-wing or bordering on shoulder wing.

    in reply to: Duxford 7th and 8th of May: Forum Meet. #1413422
    dhfan
    Participant

    We’ve decided against it. The weather forecast doesn’t look great, it’s a b****y long way from here and funds are tight.
    Hope it’s a good day for everybody and I look forward to seeing the pics.

    in reply to: Questions on B-17 #1413425
    dhfan
    Participant

    Royal Navy???

    Flood

    Designed, it would appear, by Captain Edward Terrell RN.

    in reply to: Questions on B-17 #1414022
    dhfan
    Participant

    Just done a Google for the Disney bomb, I’d never heard of it. I’ve found a couple of sites that say no British Bomber could carry it as it was 14′ long but as the Tallboy was 21′ and the Grand Slam 26′ 6″ that can’t be the reason.

    I’m sure some of us will be able to find things to argue about but this seems a fairly useful site: http://www.ww2guide.com

    in reply to: HP in a heli…DUCK!! #1414096
    dhfan
    Participant

    Good luck HP, I understand learning to drive a helicopter reinforces the belief they aren’t meant to fly.

    BTW, I believe Nick Parkhouse owns Tiger Moth G-ANOH. My dad was learning to fly in it around 50 years ago. Any chance of a recent pic I can show my mum?

    in reply to: A bit of a lemon/dud. #1414926
    dhfan
    Participant

    Wasn’t there one featured in a classic british movie?
    “Sound Barrier” or something like that ??

    TNZ

    The 2nd prototype VV119, after modification to Type 535, starred as “Prometheus”. I’m not surprised they changed the type number, it’s difficult to believe it’s the same aircraft. See Damien’s site for details.

    in reply to: De Havilland DH-9 Survivor from India #1414932
    dhfan
    Participant

    Don’t you mean £12.10s.0d ? (Just to confuse the younger members) LOL

    Roger Smith.

    Not quite that long ago – it’s the 1978 reprint, which surprised me as I thought I had it 2 or 3 years before that.

    in reply to: De Havilland DH-9 Survivor from India #1415510
    dhfan
    Participant

    According to D.H. since 1909, they were supplied to many countries including India after the end of the war. Shows how long I’ve had that Putnam, I paid £12.50 for it – new.

    The heading picture may be particularly sleek as the engine seems to be missing.

    in reply to: Most overrated bombers? #1415696
    dhfan
    Participant

    The long, weak undercarriage on the Stirling was the result of a decree by boffins at Farnborough (?) that insisted the angle of attack of the wing be increased. As production jigs were already made it was apparently too late to change them, hence the spindly undercart.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Film out-takes. #1416680
    dhfan
    Participant

    The more I think about it, the more convinced I am it was an FSM from BofB. The 2 pictures were taken from the car park, the pub being to the right of the photographers. I believe I only went to that pub once, it was a bit out in the sticks from Hoddesdon where I lived then, and I guess that would be around 1975.

    I’ve no idea what happened to it but I wouldn’t be surprised if it succumbed to the elements and fell to bits.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Film out-takes. #1416906
    dhfan
    Participant

    There are even the same trees behind it so it looks pretty conclusive to me. 🙂

    in reply to: De Havilland DH-9 Survivor from India #1417705
    dhfan
    Participant

    The Puma engine mght be sleek but it was also rubbish. The design power output of 300hp had to be derated to 230hp, making the DH.9 slower than the DH.4 it was supposed to replace.
    There were quite a few different engines fitted to the DH.9A but Liberty seems the most likely. The engine wasn’t the only change – amongst other things the 9A had substantially bigger wings than the 9.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 3,092 total)