dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,741 through 1,755 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #390989
    dhfan
    Participant

    I had a ’64 3.4 MkII. Loved it.

    in reply to: Forum Battle of Britain remake #1371370
    dhfan
    Participant

    I suppose I could be an extra in a pub – any pub.
    I’m quite good at drinking. 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #391280
    dhfan
    Participant

    I can’t agree with the launch car.
    The Jaguar name was first used in 1935 as the SS-Jaguar but ALL postwar cars were Jaguars, made by Jaguar Cars Ltd.

    Has car production at Browns Lane finished already? I thought it was supposed to be early next year.

    in reply to: Forum Battle of Britain remake #1371482
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’m feeling quite left out here. I haven’t seen it for a few years, and although having a tape somewhere, sat down to watch it on Ch5 the other week.
    As it started the ‘phone rang and I spent all apart from the last few minutes sorting problems out.

    Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

    in reply to: Flying Legends 2004 Spitfire Tail Chase #1376839
    dhfan
    Participant

    Thanks, Paul.
    I love RN201, and I don’t know why as I’m not usually keen on the silver/red scheme.

    in reply to: Can we come up with our own RAF Museum Wish List? #1376843
    dhfan
    Participant

    I haven’t been to Hendon for a couple of years, and then only briefly, but I do have a comment about the cafe, if it’s where it was then. It also shows there are other views to those expressed here, although I do largely agree with most of them.

    I took a couple of ex-RAF blokes from my local down to the Mossie Museum and as we had a little time to spare, we went to Hendon first, knowing it would only be a very brief visit. A few weeks earlier, one didn’t know the Museum existed at all and the other didn’t know there were any aircraft there.
    The sight of two chins hitting the floor as we went through the door I will never forget.
    Dougie couldn’t walk very far and I kept trying to get him to turn back but he wouldn’t stop. He made it to the cafe, which then had the Beaufort and Beaufighter next to it, I believe. He just sat there looking around, hardly able to believe his eyes. After a coffee and a break, he’d recovered enough for the walk back. He was really pleased to see the Canberra, and said “I worked on that aeroplane!” Apparently on it’s way back from the Antipodes it stopped at Singapore with an oil leak and Dougie was a very junior member of the team that fixed it and sent it on it’s way.

    We intended to go back for a proper visit but sadly Dougie died last New Years Eve.

    I doubt I’ll ever use the cafe again, but I was extremely grateful it was there then.

    in reply to: Col Pays P40 – The photos are here!!!!!! #1376846
    dhfan
    Participant

    Looking at the pic Mark12 posted, the code letters don’t look far out, although probably the wrong colour. The second aircraft appears to have much thinner codes than the first.

    in reply to: for anyone who takes digital pics… #1378680
    dhfan
    Participant

    I supplied an Epson Perfection scanner earlier this year. I can’t remember the model now but it was around £150 with a built-in slide/negative scanner. Considering the price I was very impressed.

    in reply to: General Discussion #393721
    dhfan
    Participant

    An acquaintance came up with a new twist recently, which he’s recommended to a couple of others, and it’s worked.

    He bought a new PC from PC World, agreed to take out the extended warranty if they gave him a substantial discount on the PC, which they did, and he bought it.
    When he got home, under cooling-off regulations or such like, he cancelled the extended warranty and got his money back.

    in reply to: General Discussion #393918
    dhfan
    Participant

    My standard reply when the salesperson asks is “don’t be silly”.

    in reply to: My website #1379689
    dhfan
    Participant

    Working now, Daz.

    in reply to: hypothetical "rebuild" question #1379717
    dhfan
    Participant

    I spent many years flogging aluminium so have some, half forgotten, knowledge.
    I didn’t personally have anything to do with aircraft released materials but I did pick up a little bit.

    When melting scrap ali for reuse, unless you know all the material is the same spec, and what it is, it has to be purified and then re-alloyed. The sheet, extrusions and castings from a scrap aircraft would all be totally different alloys so that’s the first problem. Secondly as somebody already mentioned, it couldn’t be used for aircraft use anyway as there couldn’t be adequate certification.

    The paperwork trail for released materials is awesome, which is one of the reasons why the stuff’s 10 times the price of commercial. It used to be said that you could trace aircraft materials back to the bloke that dug the bauxite out of the ground. I’m not sure that’s totally accurate but it’s close. One reason is if a part fails that shouldn’t have done, you can trace everything else made from that batch before it fails.
    As I said, this bit is based on what I picked up and although it may not be 100% accurate, the basic principles are correct.

    in reply to: First to exceed Mach 1? #1379739
    dhfan
    Participant

    I wouldn’t be surprised.

    I haven’t read the details for some years but I believe Martindale’s prop (and reduction gear) parted company with the airframe due to being driven too fast by the speed of the dive.

    in reply to: 'Stressed Skin' – What Does It Mean? #1380016
    dhfan
    Participant

    Hamtech -A perfect monocoque structure occurs naturally. An egg!

    As already mentioned by Chiron in post 6.

    Hamtech. Nice gift. For the Australian Imperial or UK metric version. 🙂

    in reply to: for anyone who takes digital pics… #1380167
    dhfan
    Participant

    I only speak from my experience. My old Epson is used VERY infrequently now so it’s not really fair, but Damien’s right, it takes a good few cleaning cycles to work properly.

    Most are businesses where they’re in constant use. Lexmark have staggering costs for consumables and the last few HPs I’ve had experience of have been decidedly unhappy about networks. Canon I haven’t any recent experience with, so when I found something that worked, I stuck with it.

    Edit
    Regarding the post from robbelc, I never modify the original files. You can’t modify a negative, only the way you print it so don’t change the original.

    I only play with a digital camera compared to the majority of the people on here, so I’m sure there’s more to come from them.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,741 through 1,755 (of 3,092 total)