There was a programme on Discovery Wings a week or two ago about potential nuclear-powered flight. I didn’t see it all but they showed a B-36, I think, that was flown with a functioning reactor on board for a while to check for radiation levels. I’m glad I wasn’t on it.
I don’t fancy the idea of airborne nuclear reactors but it could have made the current world endurance record look pretty feeble. 🙂
Edit.
They mentioned the Princess on the programme. There was a thread a long while ago where I said I’d heard it was planned but had never had it confirmed so I was glad to see it.
As I recall there were only two when I saw them so it must have been Calshot.
I’ve only ever been to one airshow at Biggin Hill and, apart from late-ish sixties, I haven’t a clue when it was. That confirms it wasn’t ’67 so thanks. 🙂
I knew I knew something about it, but obviously not enough. 🙂
Whatever our views on the Halifax I seem to recall at the time the RAF Museum said it would take their entire staff and budget for 10 years to restore it.
Personally, I would prefer to see it restored but it just isn’t practical on that basis.
BTW, didn’t the Wallace use D.H.9 wings?
No problem with carburettors, IIRC on a merlin it’s at the back of the engine. Turn the engine over (not quite that simple) and leave the carb the right way up. Gipsy Twelve AKA Gipsy King was inverted and carburetted.
Streamling also no difference. Visually, saw the nose off a Spifire and a ‘109 and turn them over and that’s it. Compare the Bf109 and Buchon as one example and the DB-engined Spit as another.
I saw it in our HMV shop on DVD today – £9.99 I think so Amazon’s your best bet.
Upside down or the right way up makes no difference to fitting a cannon as it still fires through the V.
I believe it’s just to do with vision over the nose. However it brings in other problems. The thrust line changes, which is probably easy for an aircraft designer to sort out, and with a geared engine by bringing the prop centre nearer the ground it will need a longer undercarriage, or smaller prop.
As already stated, the Merlin was planned to be inverted but it was dropped after resistance from the aircraft manufacturers.
As well as the DB range, it didn’t seem to cause any problems on 20-odd thousand Gipsys, including a V12.
I taped it a few years ago and have never managed to put up with more than half an hour or so. If anybody sticks with it for the whole length you have my admiration – and sympathy.
I appreciate this is painfully obvious, but as Gloster built virtually all Typhoons, what happened to their drawings?
Happy Birthday Steve, and while I’m at it, I’m glad Rob called in to start the thread.
I also am reliably informed I’m a Grumpy Old Man, so I’m now working at it.
I haven’t seen the book but did see the TV series. The strange thing is that it’s Mrs DHFan that told me I’m a GOM, and she also agreed with virtually everything said. 🙂
Would this be the same sort of emergency, or “accident” that caused a Victor to go supersonic? 🙂
My MkII had the Moss box, in fact it had two as the first one fell to bits. You get used to them. Shows how long ago it was, second-hand box, with overdrive, already removed from the car at a Jag specialist breakers – 14 quid!
Unless the wind drops I can’t see it happening. I don’t know what it’s like around Cambridge but it’s blowing half a gale here, which I guess is around 70 miles away in a straight line.
Fingers crossed.