dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre closing permanently #759073
    dhfan
    Participant

    Why? Does she absorb electricity or something similar?

     

    in reply to: Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre closing permanently #759076
    dhfan
    Participant

    Because Macron’s cap means that the energy rises come out of general taxation.

    Next…

    Add to my post.

    That was July. Hot wasn’t it?

    The UK is a net importer of electricity and both Norway and France have told us that they can’t supply our winter requirements.

    As I recall, Norway because of a shortage of water for hydro-electricity and France due to long-term maintenance on a considerable number of their nuclear power stations.

    I don’t remember whether we can have none or some, but either way there will be a shortfall.

     

    in reply to: Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre closing permanently #759128
    dhfan
    Participant

    You’re wrong.

    We buy electricity from France and Norway because the green zealots said wind and solar could make up for closing the coal and gas fired power stations.

    They were wrong too.

    in reply to: Perfectus Airscrews for Silver Biplanes #759223
    dhfan
    Participant

    Absolutely fascinating!

    in reply to: Napier Dagger engine #759447
    dhfan
    Participant

    You have to remember – Oracal knows everything.

    in reply to: Aircraft Fragment from Northumberland ID – Junkers? #759592
    dhfan
    Participant

    I thought when it was first posted about checking – accurately – the size of the nut but since it was described as “tiny” I doubted it would be conclusive after prolonged immersion.

    Being brass, as said it may unscrew and the thread pitch could give a hint at least.

    dhfan
    Participant

    There was NO £6.5 million of public donations. There was £6.5 million of public donations directly to VTTS, solely FOR THE VULCAN.

    Other than that, it did not exist and would not have existed so couldn’t have been spent on anything.

    As for the original promise about delivery to Duxford, I seem to recall nobody asked Duxford if they wanted it, which would seem unlikely as they’ve already got a Vulcan.

    I very much doubt it’s going to consume any more money as people have had enough and the costs will be enormous.

    I hope I’m wrong but I fear saucepans…

     

    dhfan
    Participant

    Please stop going on about this non-existent pot of cash.

    Some of the £2.75 million may have gone to historic aviation but it wouldn’t have bought Bruntingthorpe and built a museum, it would have been dished out in dribs and drabs.

    I seem to recall it only went to the Vulcan, reluctantly, after a presumably orchestrated public outcry.

    The other £6.5 million or so was largely public donations.

    VTTS discovered that as soon as XH558 was grounded, the income stream dried up and they were unable to pay for a lease, long-term storage or build the mooted academy building and adjacent hangar.

    dhfan
    Participant

    It’s all very well coming out – yet again – and saying “the money spent on the Vulcan could have saved etc” but the fact is, it wouldn’t have done.

    There was no pot of cash waiting to be spent, it was raised from Joe Public, and a few OEM manufacturers, with the specific intention of returning one particular airframe to flight.

    End of story, as VTTS found out when they came up with the pie in the sky project to return the one-time world altitude record holder Canberra to flight.

    Admirable though the idea is, a Canberra has no place in the hearts of the Great British Public, as VTTS discovered when cash didn’t come flooding in. Did it even come trickling in?

    in reply to: Looking like the Beverley is in dire straits AGAIN #759918
    dhfan
    Participant

    The Beverley is 162 ft span and nearly 40 feet high.

    A colossal hangar is never going to miraculously appear and as TwinOtter says, even outdoors needs a huge amount of space.

    in reply to: Looking like the Beverley is in dire straits AGAIN #759922
    dhfan
    Participant

    When it’s put back together where?

    There is no available hangar, or likely to be one, anywhere near large enough for a beast the size of a Beverley.

    If it’s stored with the intention of reassembling it sometime, it would merely be delaying the inevitable.

    in reply to: Aero engine photographs #759928
    dhfan
    Participant

    It looks to me like it’s probably around 200 posts needed for PMs – to “new” members.

    It’s not an exhaustive search but I haven’t seen a PM button for anybody with fewer than 200 except one with only 16 posts, but a member for 14 years plus.

    in reply to: New Earhart bio coming out, TIGHAR not mentioned #760810
    dhfan
    Participant

    Out of those 7.8 billion people, how many actually care?

     

    in reply to: New Earhart bio coming out, TIGHAR not mentioned #760820
    dhfan
    Participant

    I don’t think anybody here is that interested, although I’m prepared to be proven wrong.

    in reply to: Abandon Aircraft sign – From what? #760831
    dhfan
    Participant

    Re frame numbers.

    Isn’t the main bulkhead on a Spitfire Frame 5?

    Apart from a dirty great Merlin, that’s almost at the front.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 3,092 total)