dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,831 through 1,845 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • dhfan
    Participant

    As the Comet is the DH88 and the Mossie the DH98 it’s a fair bet. 😀

    in reply to: WWII Aviation Pubs (2004 thread) #1424463
    dhfan
    Participant

    Years ago there was a pub in Kingswood, Kent called the Battle of Britain. Apart from the name I don’t know of any links but the place infuriated me as the roundel on the sign was a French one.

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1424502
    dhfan
    Participant

    An excellent read and an amazing man. Extremely clever and right place right time, a couple of times. Even to modern times, the current worldwide success of the RB211 series engines could be put down to his (in conjunction with other retired RR engineers) redesign.

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1424525
    dhfan
    Participant

    As an aside, Ford also completely re-drew the Merlin to much tighter tolerances. They said the original tolerances were far too loose for successful mass production. It took a year.
    Source: Stanley Hooker – Not Much of an Engineer.

    in reply to: Castle Bromwich Spitfire factory ?? #1426854
    dhfan
    Participant

    Just been speaking to a Brummie (Walsall, actually but close) in the local and apparently Hams Hall is still there, but is now gas-fired.

    Had a quick flick through Sigh for a Merlin and the original plan was for runways (plural at least) and perimeter track. Ended up with “tarmac roadway and 400 to 500 yards of runway”.

    in reply to: Castle Bromwich Spitfire factory ?? #1427280
    dhfan
    Participant

    It’s been years since i’ve read the book but was it Alex or Jeffrey Quill that said in bad weather they could still find their base because the thermals emitted from a chimney disturbed the clouds and gave an indication of where they were.
    Sorry if it’s slightly off topic but i did wonder if this was there,Ta 😮

    Alex Henshaw – Sigh for a Merlin. Hams Hall power station, IIRC.

    It’s been a while since I read it, too, but I suspect there was never much to see in the way of airfield structures. They wanted to build huge runways for Lancaster testing, at great expense and inconvenience. At Alex Henshaw’s suggestion, they ended up with only one 400 yard runway.

    in reply to: The 2004 thread – MB-5 replica #1430009
    dhfan
    Participant

    If I were a Director of Martin Baker, I would be instructing my lawyers to make very, very sure that the name ‘Martin Baker’ is never used in any way, shape or form in connection with this contraption.

    Quite the opposite, there’s a link to it on the Martin Baker website.

    in reply to: DH goblin #1431470
    dhfan
    Participant

    It looks as if Halton – who I think designed the Goblin…

    Major Frank Halford

    in reply to: DH goblin #1432175
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’ve never heard of any of the Bluebirds being powered by a Goblin – seems unlikely. It would have to have been a boat as the cars were wheel-driven, Proteus I think on the last one.
    Prototype Meteor (F9/40?) was powered by the Halford H.1 which became the Goblin, other than that I believe it’s only the Vampire.
    Vague memories – XP59?

    in reply to: British aircraft manufacturers during the war #1434149
    dhfan
    Participant

    Shortly after he died the company went into liquidation. Had something to do with politics I understand.

    Cees

    IIRC, when the government insisted on the mass mergers, HP refused. The government said “No merger, no contracts”.

    in reply to: Vulcan windows #1434977
    dhfan
    Participant

    IIRC it was for nuclear flash reasons.

    in reply to: British aircraft manufacturers during the war #1434980
    dhfan
    Participant

    Of the big names, several were still in charge. They almost certainly had shareholders to consider but Sir TOM Sopwith controlled Hawker, the White family controlled Bristol and Geoffrey de Havilland and Frederick Handley Page still headed their respective organisations.

    in reply to: Heritage Lottery Fund – 10 Years On #1435003
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’m not denying it does its’ job Steve, I just think it could have been better.

    If interesting is one of the desired qualities. look at the link I posted to Cosford. It’s interesting, highly suitable and environmentally friendly.
    What they’re getting is all strange angles and an architects flight of fancy.
    Also note that the page is still up, over a year (I think) after the other buiding was approved.

    Sorry, got on my soapbox and gone off topic here.

    I’ll get me coat…

    in reply to: Heritage Lottery Fund – 10 Years On #1435099
    dhfan
    Participant

    I agree that it wasn’t a bad contribution, although it pales into insignificance against the £73 million (?) the Royal Opera House got and, if what I read yesterday is correct, the £449 million on the South Bank tent.

    However the AAM is what I’m on about. Somebody was really impressed with the fancy design but I’m sure a simpler building would have been cheaper and more suitable.

    in reply to: Heritage Lottery Fund – 10 Years On #1435113
    dhfan
    Participant

    No we haven’t!
    Dome, Opera houses….

    (mutter, mutter, mutter)

    I agree hangarage is the first priority. Unfortunately, idiot architects and style gurus think that fancy (expensive) buildings, even for keeping aeroplanes in, are better than hangars. See AAm and the new development at Cosford for examples.
    This: http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/cosford/aboutus/building.cfm is what Cosford wanted.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,831 through 1,845 (of 3,092 total)