dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,816 through 1,830 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: East Kirkby Night Run This Sat 20th. #1418564
    dhfan
    Participant

    Change of plan. As we’ve still got snow on the ground from Thursday and it’s brass monkeys outside, we’re going to wait until next year.

    in reply to: Ah, Winter…Season of Maintenance #1419518
    dhfan
    Participant

    Yes, Patty owns a Vincent and a few other two wheeled machines.

    I could learn to hate that man.

    in reply to: E-bay – the modeller's best friend #1419525
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’ve been overtaken by technology. I wrote a database years ago to keep track of my kit stash. Unfortunately, I wrote it in dBase III+ and I can’t remember how to use it. 🙁

    Think I’ve got a Dominie.

    in reply to: E-bay – the modeller's best friend #1420171
    dhfan
    Participant

    Silly season for Putnam prices on Ebay at the moment.

    Did get a silly cheap one a month or two ago – Brirtish Bomber since 1914 for £2.99

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1420175
    dhfan
    Participant

    Well done, that man. Settles it then.

    in reply to: East Kirkby Night Run This Sat 20th. #1422193
    dhfan
    Participant

    We’re planning to be there, not sure what time yet.

    in reply to: Worst Airshow #1422218
    dhfan
    Participant

    Last year (2003) wasn’t my best either. Only went to two airshows, Coventry on the Saturday and Legends Saturday.

    in reply to: Forgotten De Havilland #1422221
    dhfan
    Participant

    Not expert, but at least some books are to hand. 🙂

    The Dolphin only appears to have flown twice. First flight September ’36, scrapped in December. It was structurally overweight and DH were too busy with the Albatross and mass-production of the Tiger Moth to spare the design staff to sort it out.
    No original drawings have/had come to light but there’s a GA drawing in the Putnam DH book.

    The Don, not in my opinion one of the more attractive DH designs, was originally designed as a multipurpose trainer with turret et al. “Officially-inspired improvements”, made it overweight so the turrets and other training aids were removed and they were delivered as communications aircraft. 30 built plus another 20 without engines.
    A few pictures in the Putnam book but, a) copyright and b) I’m not going to open my book out flat to get it on the scanner.

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1422369
    dhfan
    Participant

    As far as design authority goes, I can’t believe RR would ever have relinquished it. There was huge reluctance within RR to let any other organisation build their engines, in fact for a long time, point-blank refusal.

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1422390
    dhfan
    Participant

    I don’t suppose there was much need for Rover to change anything. The factory was handed over to them as a going concern, already in full production AFAIK. Their’s would be more of a management role than anything else.

    As Mark12 said, it does seem difficult to believe Packard would use BA, BSF and BSW threads. In similar vein, the DH Gipsy range of engines used metric threads and they were re-drawn for Australian production.

    Greatest piston engine ever? Possibly military but I believe it took a lot of work to get it reliable enough for civil use.

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1422604
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’ve always understood the Packard Merlins were re-drawn for American threads. This could cause problems with interchangeability on certain parts. However, I can’t find any references to it so it may have just been an assumption on my part.
    I used to know an-ex RAF engine fitter who worked on both so he may have told me. He was also the only person I’ve ever known complain about the Packard Merlin – but he liked moaning so I never took much notice of that.

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1423304
    dhfan
    Participant

    When did Packard start manufacturing Merlins? Was it as a result of US aircraft requirements or were they used initially to suppliment UK demands?

    Without looking it up I can’t say when but it was originally to supplement UK requirements, after Ford (U.S) had turned us down.

    in reply to: Merlin-engined motor cars #1423306
    dhfan
    Participant

    Someone have his sweeties stolen this morning?

    as we all know the Jaguar V-12 is two V-8 landrover engines less a bit.

    I know you jest, do you?

    Yes, the Clive du Cros replica was originally powered by a Jaguar V12. The reduction gearing was a substantial part of the cost. I don’t believe it was ever changed but I don’t know for certain.

    in reply to: Classic British Aircraft #1423698
    dhfan
    Participant

    Cue the ‘personal planner’ feature 🙂

    I missed it by being asleep, still in the chair. If the personal planner can do a sharp poke in the ribs, I should have set it. 🙂

    in reply to: Classic British Aircraft #1424064
    dhfan
    Participant

    I missed it too, but it’s repeated Monday.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,816 through 1,830 (of 3,092 total)