dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airspeed Oxford #1561786
    dhfan
    Participant

    Didn’t know Nevil Shute Norway was an Aussie. Learn something everyday. I knew he spent a fair bit of time in Australia after he became a full time novelist. Did he retire “back” there?

    To clarify JDK’s post, IIRC, he wasn’t only the designer at Airpeed, he was the joint founder with Hessel Tiltman. They both left De Havillands to start the company. It’s in “Slide Rule” but I haven’t read it for years.

    dhfan
    Participant

    Only 30,000 or so. 🙂

    in reply to: "Preserved" at Lasham… #1561960
    dhfan
    Participant

    MAM tried to buy the Drover when Southend closed. I was a member at the time, ( I often am, I just keep forgetting to renew and have to start again) and we were quite surprised to be outbid.

    dhfan
    Participant

    I wouldn’t know about the relative merits of RR and Packard. A recently deceased ex-RAF engine fitter complained bitterly about the Packard, but, (a) he was a grumpy old s*d, and (b) I’ve never heard of anybody else complaining. As an aside, I understand the toolkit supplied with the Packard engines was superb.

    However, there were problems when Ford were asked to make the Merlin at Trafford Park. They said they couldn’t make them, Rolls-Royce said “Not surprised. Tolerances too tight for you?” Ford said “No, the opposite. Far too lax, everything would have to be individually matched”. I can’t look up the exact details at the moment, the book(s) I think it’s in are still with the estate of the aforementioned grumpy old s*d.

    Further to the above, the Merlin was re-drawn to motor industry tolerances. I would assume, with the Ford production coming first, it’s likely that the revised drawings were sent to Packard.
    If so it’s probable that the Packard was built to tighter tolerances.

    dhfan
    Participant

    You’ll find there was a fair bit of British involvement in the A bomb too.

    in reply to: Cosford 13/03/04 #1563290
    dhfan
    Participant

    I know Kev’s a native, so to speak, but I’ll consult the Good Beer Guide.

    in reply to: Buried Lancasters.(2004 thread) #1563435
    dhfan
    Participant

    It was reported in FlyPast and/or Aeroplane Monthly at the time but, as already said, it was years ago now. Could even be 10 or 12 years but I’m not sure.
    I don’t think anybody’s ever produced a complete updateable index for either mag. It would be extremely handy when looking for something. I always get distracted, read the old mags and never find what I was originally looking for.
    If I put all of each years indeces in the same place it would probably be a good start. 🙂

    in reply to: How many Spitfires would you like? #1564353
    dhfan
    Participant

    Originally posted by JDK
    One of my fave Spit schemes – the one of the BBMF 19s in the prototype 19 scheme. 10/10 for originality.

    IIRC, it was the prototype MkXIV scheme. I argued with the guide at Coningsby when he said it was a MkXVI scheme. He dragged me into the office after the tour finished and found I was right.
    Unless there were two similar, of course.

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft #1564356
    dhfan
    Participant

    Nimrod AEW3 is a good point. I saw one display at Hatfield and it was a bit of a shock.

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft #1564940
    dhfan
    Participant

    Sorry, I still don’t like them. I have a soft spot for the Mk21, though I’ve never seen one in the flesh.

    in reply to: Hunter question #1565187
    dhfan
    Participant

    Mine too. I remember suggesting to Dad that we needed a bigger telly.

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft #1565189
    dhfan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Anybody brave enough to volunteer the ugliest Spitfire varient?;)

    Flood.

    All the lowbacks, and even worse with the gigantic tail. Note I’m talking appearance here, not what I’d want to be in if nasty people were shooting at me.
    That’s assuming I could be taught to fly an aeroplane, of course.

    in reply to: Oi! Neilly! #1565191
    dhfan
    Participant

    A vandal’s been at it.

    dhfan
    Participant

    3. Was it supposed to be non-stop?
    “In 1923, Lieutenant Oakley Kelly and Lieutenant John A Macready made the first non-stop transcontinental flight from New York to California.”

    dhfan
    Participant

    Geoffrey de Havilland was 1909 as was Moore-Brabazon which was the first accredited flight. It seems certain that A V Roe was earlier at Brooklands but it wasn’t accepted at the time.

    You must have different books to us, Distiller.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 3,092 total)