dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rolls Royce meteor engine runup #1282318
    dhfan
    Participant

    Eh? Every engine I’ve ever worked on (and that’s quite a few) rotate anti-clockwise as viewed from the front.

    Roy.

    You must have come across a very strange collection of vehicle engines.

    Or your clocks are extremely odd.

    in reply to: Lancaster Query #1283684
    dhfan
    Participant
    in reply to: Building a Chipmunk from scratch #1284367
    dhfan
    Participant

    de Havilland, de Havilland Canada and the Portuguese (I think) didn’t have too much trouble but I suspect their staffing and training levels may have been a bit higher than yours.

    Just look how long Glyn Powell’s taking with the Mossie in New Zealand and there’s no doubting he’s got the skills. Different skillset for a Chipmunk but you’re not going to do it in a few years of evenings.

    in reply to: Rolls Royce meteor engine runup #1284374
    dhfan
    Participant

    My late dad used to drive Cromwells, and Comets. National Service at Catterick and Lulworth.

    in reply to: Rolls Royce meteor engine runup #1284834
    dhfan
    Participant

    How strange, when the “normal” rotation for a vehicle engine is clockwise from the front.

    A thought – Merlin drive-end is the front, Meteor drive-end is presumably the back?

    in reply to: Rolls Royce meteor engine runup #1284887
    dhfan
    Participant

    There’s a bit more to it than that… The Meteor rotates the other way to a Merlin and many of the parts are different.

    Adrian

    AFAIK, the Meteor rotates the same way as the Merlin. It’s the reduction gear fitted to the Merlin that reverses the rotation and the Meteor doesn’t have one.

    in reply to: Hurricane's claims to fame #1285433
    dhfan
    Participant

    I thought it was the other way around – used in more theatres/campaigns but in less numbers, as there were fewer built in the first place.

    I’m not sure quantity helps here anyway. Around 14,000 Hurricanes were built, as opposed to 22,000 Spitfires. In similar vein but possibly the opposite, 11,000 Wellingtons and 8,000 Lancasters. What does that prove?

    From all I’ve heard, the Defiant was an excellent, very strong, well-designed and well-built aircraft. The fact that the basic premise of a single-engined turret fighter was no use is why they stopped making them very quickly. I guess it could have been as capable and versatile as the Hurricane if the turret had been binned and thoughts given to what use could have been made of the airframe. Not a wise move considering the urgency of production at the time I agree and the right decision was made but I see no reason why the Vickers ‘S’ gun couldn’t have been fitted to Defiants.

    in reply to: No Guts, No Glory on the move #1287365
    dhfan
    Participant

    No, ignore Digby, he’s always like that. B***y rude.

    in reply to: Memorable Airshows! #1287600
    dhfan
    Participant

    Off-hand, I can’t think of one in particular.

    All the Finningley shows I went to, the last 6 or 7 I think.
    Seeing the Russians arrive for the first time – 5(?) dirty great fighters “escorted” by a Red Arrows Hawk from displaying at Leuchars. All the way from Moscow-ish, display at Leuchars and Finningley and back home, all on internal fuel.

    My first Legends, only 4 or 5 years ago.

    2003 was the worst year. I only went to 2 airshows, Coventry on the Saturday and Legends on the Saturday. I couldn’t face any more that year after 2 fatal crashes.

    in reply to: Hurricane's claims to fame #1287613
    dhfan
    Participant

    Braddock!

    Continuing off-topic, I have a hardback book around somewhere – “I Flew With Braddock”.

    in reply to: Spitfires in WWII Germany? #1288747
    dhfan
    Participant
    in reply to: Vintage and classic jets #1289399
    dhfan
    Participant

    It was actually an early Pulse Jet if I’m not mistaken :confused:

    Correct, as Daz said in Post#14.

    The Panther was one of the first plastic kits I ever built. Aged about 7, 1959-ish, it was probably still in service and we’re talking about OLD aeroplanes. 🙁

    Or was it a Cougar…?

    in reply to: Vintage and classic jets #1289785
    dhfan
    Participant

    The S.R.53 was hybrid. Armstrong Siddeley Viper at the top and a de H. Spectre underneath.

    It was what would now be called a technology demonstrator for the S.R.177.

    Edit:
    IIRC, the original suggestion was for a rocket-powered interceptor with a “get you home” jet.
    They realised fairly soon it would be far more use as basically a jet aircraft with the rocket for serious grunt.

    in reply to: Mosquito RR299 #1293546
    dhfan
    Participant

    It was a good day despite the weather 🙂

    I’m glad your photos of the day came out like that – mine did too!

    I thought it was me.

    in reply to: Mosquito RR299 #1293876
    dhfan
    Participant

    I guess it was around July 1987. It was the Mossie Museum’s flying display weekend.

    I only found out something special was going to happen when my sister told me she’d been in her garden in Welwyn Garden City, saw a Mosquito, as did her husband and they suddenly realised they were looking in different directions.

    Any previous plans I may have had were immediately cancelled.

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 3,092 total)