dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Crashed RAF-bomber Ockenburg #1295189
    dhfan
    Participant

    Fairy nuff.

    in reply to: Crashed RAF-bomber Ockenburg #1295200
    dhfan
    Participant

    August/September 1940 could be right for a raid on Berlin, I think. IIRC, it was in retaliation for the bombs dropped on London, but I don’t know offhand how many raids there were.

    Did a Hampden have the range to get to Berlin?

    in reply to: Time Team digging a Zeppelin? #1295231
    dhfan
    Participant

    Personally, I’m happy to wait until the Timewatch programme’s been shown.

    After that – tell us what they left out. 🙂

    in reply to: Mosquito RR299 #1297042
    dhfan
    Participant

    I was fortunate enough to be at Salisbury Hall for the display by RR299 and RS712 together.

    Absolutely wonderful.

    in reply to: Weather forecasts #1302489
    dhfan
    Participant

    The Lanc was supposed to be landing but the last I read said it wasn’t.

    Met Office says 20mph SW wind which doesn’t look promising – but I’m on my way anyway.

    in reply to: Mosquito KA114 Update #1302697
    dhfan
    Participant

    There was a “restored” P.40 in one of the monthlies a year or two back where they seemed quite proud of the fact they’d replaced the complete fuselage, or possibly the entire airframe.

    If it looks like a Mosquito, sounds like a Mosquito and flies like a Mosquito…

    Amazing job, and I assume he’s got a few less people working on it than de Havilland had. 🙂

    in reply to: FL2006 – Latest Participant List #1303814
    dhfan
    Participant

    I think it does.

    Digby is happy to call some of the punters numpties, despite the fact they will be paying a substantial amount of loot to go to Legends.

    That isn’t to say I agree with some, all, or less of the comments on this thread but they/we are still the paying public.

    in reply to: Project for Divers? #1306896
    dhfan
    Participant

    Hood & Bismarck was a different team to Bob Ballard’s that originally found Bismarck.

    After seeing the results of finding the Titanic, Ballard didn’t give out the location of Bismarck.

    The documentary mentioned was led by David ??????, a UK based American or Canadian. Hood is in three widely separated bits, which considering she blew up and went down in seconds, is hardly surprising.

    I think I’ve seen a Jutland expedition on TV recently, may be the same guy.

    in reply to: FL2006 – Latest Participant List #1308399
    dhfan
    Participant

    How?

    “Manage attachments”

    in reply to: FL2006 – Latest Participant List #1308425
    dhfan
    Participant

    Far too complicated.

    Just “Go Advanced” and there’s a box to upload photographs.

    in reply to: He-111 Question #1309912
    dhfan
    Participant

    From memory, of 15 years+ ago, I’m sure you’re right.

    IIRC, there were references to, for example, He111K Mk5. With hindsight of course, we now know that’s complete gibberish. Makes you wonder how good our intelligence was early in the war.

    in reply to: He-111 Question #1310214
    dhfan
    Participant

    Several years ago, Aeroplane published a magazine that was basically reprints of Aeroplane, (and Flight, I think) from during WWII. They’re in the deepest bowels of the garage so I can’t check immediately but IIRC it was published exactly 50 years later and was supposed to continue for the duration of the actual unpleasantness.
    The War in the Air or similar…

    It only ran for a couple of years, and despite subscribing, I still managed to miss one. 🙁

    There were a couple of pages in the back where Bill Gunston, with the benefit of hindsight and 50 years’ research, explained some of the apparently strange comments, claims, reports etc.

    The He111 was ALWAYS referred to as the K, supposedly standing for Krieg (war) as opposed to the pre-war civil versions.

    in reply to: Unknown aircraft seat #1311005
    dhfan
    Participant

    Rumbolds were a well-known aircraft seating and interior company. They were certainly still in business in the late 70s/early 80s and, IIRC, were in West London.

    This might help, courtesy of Google:

    http://www.e-update.uk.com/contour/aboutus/index.php?contentID=20

    in reply to: Aircraft based at Predannack during WWII #1312842
    dhfan
    Participant

    Will
    Action Stations 5 has the following, in no particular order:
    Hurricanes 247 Sqn.
    Havocs 1457 Flight.
    Beaufighters 141 Sqn
    Whirlwinds 263 Sqn
    Mosquitos 618 Sqn 151 Sqn
    Typhoons 183 Sqn
    Wellingtons 304 Sqn 179 Sqn 311 Sqn
    Spitfires 1 Sqn 165 Sqn
    Tempests 33 Sqn 222 Sqn

    Pulled from the text so not exhaustive, and there are a couple of squadrons mentioned where their aircraft aren’t specified, but it’s a start.

    in reply to: Time Team digging a Zeppelin? #1313242
    dhfan
    Participant

    Try Googling -Led. Should cut most of it out.

    Sizewell never bothered me, or the locals until gangs of “media representatives” started descending on them and asking if they were concerned when they were building Sizewell B.

    Wrong age for playing – spent my time visiting WWII airfields and getting outside as much Abbot Ale as possible. (Adnams ordinary bitter gives me heartburn).

    Dunwich fascinates me. I stood on the cliffs and looked out to sea and still couldn’t grasp that there was a fairly substantial town out there.

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 3,092 total)