dark light

FMK.6JOHN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A nice afternoon a Flixton #1221826
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Only been to Flixton once about four years ago, bloomin loved the place, must get back there some day.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Cork Screw . . . . .Now ! #500848
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    It’s the Messerschmitt Bf 110G-2 that is currently at Hendon museum, the photo is a peculiar angle and represents what might be seen by a tail gunner during a night mission, the 110 being a nightfighter version.

    The acompanying title of ‘Cork Screw…….Now!’ is the instruction that the tail gunner would have given the pilot having seen such a disturbing site (Cork Screw being and evasive manouvre done by the Lancasters to evade enemy aircraft).

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: XH558 Canceled for Shoreham and Bournemouth #1225971
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    How long is a peice of string?, you won’t get an engineer without paying him/them and where does the money come from.

    Are Aerobytes, Serco, Rolls Royce, EADS, AD, and BP not major sponsors?, there are more I am sure but the names escape me.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: XH558 Canceled for Shoreham and Bournemouth #1225985
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Well she has displayed far more times than cancelled, the project had to get up and running this year or it would have totally folded and we would not have her flying now, they will not take any risks flying this historic jet and at the meerest whif of a problem then she is grounded until it is fixed and signed off, shouldn’t this be the way rather than risk loosing everything.

    She needed to fly when she did so that major sponsors could be attracted, and they were, she has been successfully sponsored by firms that completely understand that there will be technical glitches and sometimes she will have to cancel airshows.

    Like I said this year is a major learning curve for a civilian company operating a large complicated jet of this type and this time will be taken as a lesson, the next years airshow season should see people well rehearsed and the airshow appearances will come thick and fast.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: XH558 Canceled for Shoreham and Bournemouth #1226047
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    C’mon guys, this has to be the first major setback (although it is a minor repair job) and people are quick to knock the whole project with adverse comments.

    She has been grounded for 15 years (or thereabouts) and is now back where she belongs, and during her re-newed flying career there will be setbacks like this which will require a certain amount of downtime, it’s what happens when you fly a complicated jet.

    Lets not forget this is first major civilian project of this type and quite frankly every time she takes to the sky’s major benchmarks have been achieved and this first year on the display curcuit will be a learning curve for all involved.

    It also gripes me when people complain that they have pre-booked tickets for an airshow and feel that they have waisted there money when XH558 has had to cancel, does this one aircraft make the whole show?, what did we go and see before she was flying?.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: XH558 Canceled for Shoreham and Bournemouth #1226440
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    As far as I know it’s the port main undercarriage door retraction ram attatchment bracket that has failed in some way, it has been a known problem whilst in service and is a minor setback.

    She is currently hangered at Brize and is expected to be back in the air within the next week to ten days.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe open day canceled. #1226741
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I believe some of the LPG crew will be there this weekend working on 728’s jet pipes and painting the Q’shed.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Tripod use at RAF museum cosford #449808
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Kev35

    Thankyou for the clarification, I miss understood that Cosford being part of the RAF network then the rules might be the same for them as is at Hendon.

    On the several occasions I have been to Cosford I have never use a tripod but several other places have given me responses exactly as you describe, it’s funny though if you were to just walk into a museum with a tripod without asking, then there is alway one who will challenge you like you are an excaped convict, and yet if you do ask for one then you get the obligatory grunt and puzzled look!!.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Tripod use at RAF museum cosford #449816
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Just make sure when you enter the museum go to the reception and pick up a tripod pass, totally free and no hassle, just an H&S requirement I believe.

    John.

    in reply to: MEGA TYPHOON/TEMPEST PHOTO ALBUM ON EBAY #1227572
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant
    in reply to: Spade grip from which airplane? #1228681
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Judging by the tattood hand and wrist chain i would let him call it whatever he wants!!!.

    John.

    in reply to: T5 Lightning XS458 #1229704
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I very gratefully given a ‘fishtail’ panel from the rear end of an F.6 belly tank that had no paint on it, try as I might to get a nice polished finish on it my arm nearly fell off :eek:.

    Several hours buffing and swearing later it looks good but sod doing a full airframe:D.

    Without serious machinery, large amounts of scaffold, square miles of wet and dry you aint never gonna get a painted lightning sparkling again.

    John.

    in reply to: T5 Lightning XS458 #1231216
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    bms44,

    As far as I know this and the two at Bruntingthorpe for all intents and purposses are ‘airworthy’, in the sense that they were delivered to their respective airfields by flight and have not been tampered with since to prevent them from taking flight again.

    There will be enough runway and as long as there is around 1000lb per wing of fuel then a circuit is possible, now comes the difficult bit, these birds are maintained to the highest standards possible, with the resources and funding available, the RAF will have de-milled them when they were delivered which would have involved dissabling the bang seat and some equipment in the cockpit (radar and weapons systems iirc).

    One problem is that some systems simply cannot without the right test equipment be tested on the ground, undercarriage retraction (not that you would on a simple circuit) would possibly be a problem since they are not regularly cycled then the first retraction might be its last!!.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Sea Vixen Question #1232303
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I do understand all you are saying, and it applies to FAW.1 & 2s (only the 110s lacked the fairing)
    I just dont get the raised and curved part of it under the windscreen side panel. Is it designed that way for a reason rather than the whole assembly being faired more aerodynamicaly to the fusalage? I have taken the liberty of ed you pic to show what I mean.
    Nowt to lose sleep over I know!

    Pagen,

    The reason for this ‘teardrop’ design under the front windscreen is simple, while the aircraft is stood still, say on deck between sorties, then water will run down the screen and into the ducting.

    To prevent the water from running down the ducting and into the engine (therfore inducing premature carrosion issues) the teardrop shape collects the water and then it drains through the low point drain hole as illustrated by the streak marks in your attatched picture.

    Hope this helps.

    John.

    in reply to: Jaguar On Ebay! #1235162
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Thanks Nash, I needed a good giggle this morning:D:D:D.

    John.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,188 total)