dark light

FMK.6JOHN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Oddest looking aircraft #1295365
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Another ugly one – the french prototype PAYEN 22

    A French prototype with German markings?, Whats the story.

    John.

    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Can’t remember where I got this pic from but credit due to whoever it originates from.

    Yes the DH88, Beautifull in every curve and even more so in the flesh, One of the very few prop planes that ever made a jet freak like me go weak at the knees.

    John.

    in reply to: Source for bullets? #1298687
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    There’s no mad rush :p

    Dig out your yellow pages and give your local gun club a ring, there is always someone who re-loads their own ammunition and .303 is a very common round so chances are that there would be some willing donations of old cartridges.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Source for bullets? #1298698
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Bullets are always safe until you sit them in a cartridge on top of a propellant charge. OK, so I’m being picky but a bullet is the bit that does the damage. The bit that holds the propellant and percussion cap is a cartridge and the whole assembly is referred to as a round. Don’t ask me why as I don’t know but that is the terminolgy used.

    The term ’round’ comes from the time of muzzle loading musket rifles that used a measured amount of black powder poured down the barrel followed by a ’round’ lead ball.

    Gunpowder was never in short supply but the lead balls sometimes where hence the commonly used term ‘how many ’rounds’ have you got left’.

    Regards,

    John.

    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Did someone mention Avon’s?

    John.

    in reply to: HOW'S THIS! General Chuck Yeager! #1300957
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Indeed without the Miles M52 the USA would not have got there first!!!.

    I was led to believe that after detaching from the carrier ship the X1 was put into a climb to get to the desired conditions and then once leveled out supersonic flight was achieved.

    John.

    in reply to: HOW'S THIS! General Chuck Yeager! #1301133
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    One can only magine that it is easier to ride a bike downhill than it is to ride it on a flat road, the same can be applied to flight.

    One must also remember that at the time that Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier the aircraft in service where driven by very inneficient jet engines that could get the airframe up to the transonic region but not through the sound barrier, once at the transonic stage it was possible to put the aircraft into a shallow dive and add more airspeed using gravitiy therefore just managing to push through the sound barrier.

    Mr Yeager was piloting a rocket powered airframe that presented much less drag and was able to acheive supersonic LEVEL flight, it was not long after that that people began to add things up, all moving tail plane, high degree of sweep back on the main wings, more powerfull engines and supersonic flight was then commonplace.

    regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Viggen could break cover at Newark #1303017
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Discounted admission to boot! me thinks me going to Newark!!!.

    John.

    in reply to: MAM Pics as requested. #1303026
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Spanking good shots Kev35!!!

    John.

    in reply to: New reconnaissance for the RAF. Caption competition. #1303843
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    The RAF’s new high speed runway inspection department was unsure about the new technique.

    in reply to: Corgi model confusion???. #1307565
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    After having done a little research and the usefull information received on the thread, the run of 4000 are all the same, picture and model are that of XR718 but the text is from XP749.

    Interestingly XR718 was modeled twice by Corgi, once as 11SQD, and once as 5SQD.

    This one was cheap £25!!!! but alas he only had one left otherwise I would have had ten 😀 .

    John.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1308245
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Low enough?.

    John.

    in reply to: Corgi model confusion???. #1308662
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Crikey!!, Thanks for the info.

    John.

    in reply to: Oddest looking aircraft #1309984
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    This one gets my vote!!, Bleriot 125.

    John.

    in reply to: OT: video of engine failure and crew abandon ac #1311323
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    if you ever get round to spotting at Valley, you’ll see this practised quite frequently.

    I had the pleasure of doing just that a couple of years ago when on holiday at Treaddur bay, It must have been a damn good wake up call to some young cocky jet jocks!!!!!!.

    John.

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,188 total)