I have to be careful what I say, because I do not want to get accused of ‘advertising’, but this is a big beef of mine. We find a lot of our own titles showing on assorted websites that we never have any dealings with at prices that are astronomic and frankly, stupid (or should that be greedy?). I have seen some of our books listed as being ‘rare – out of print’ when I have plenty left – to the point I have been selling them at a discount on e-bay… I have seen others listed as ‘author-signed’ when that particular book was not even completed until after the authors death! – I wonder what they tell the purchaser when they discover there is no signature?
It does occasionally work the other way – one of our more high-end titles was recently spotted on a national-to-the-UK bookshop chains online store as being ‘60% off’ which was kind of funny, because we had never accepted orders from them in the last eight years (this chain stopped ordering books from us when I refused to give them 60% discount, 120 days sale or return and THEN a 90 day invoice they were demanding from us!). I cannot believe they sold any, for they never placed orders with us!
Bear in mind though shipping costs – a US-produced title not printed in the UK is going to rack up costs when sold in the UK that have to be taken into account and often is reflected in the price – and vice-versa for books produced/printed in the UK and sold elsewhere in the world – and because we are operating in a global market, the fluctuating exchange rates also have to be taken into account.
If you do pay over-the-odds prices, well… that’s up to you – if you want the book that bad, then I guess that’s your right. I would say however ‘buyer beware’ at some of these silly prices spotted – and if you know it, contact the publisher first to see if they have any copies in stock!
I would also say query any long-delivery times you may get when you walk into a book department of some of the national chains – we turn around all orders within 2 working days, and we know also that some stores tell customers that ‘oh yes Sir/Madame… we can get you that title, but it will take 20 weeks’ – thats really great to hear in the run-up to Christmas and so you walk out the bookstore thinking bad of the publisher and they get away with not telling you that they cannot get it because they are too greedy. I know that sounds paranoid and crazy, but I walked into a store in Peterborough and asked about one of my own authored books – and got told EXACTLY that by a sales-person behind the desk who clicked way at her computer for some time. My reply is un-repeatable!
I may have one…. I’ll look this evening
Part Two
Looked… checked- no… it’s A Gipsy Six manual!
PLEASE pull them photos!
To leave them up right now is the ultimate of disrespect and bad taste
I been doing some further digging through the MACRs and have come up with the following list
All say ‘Isle of Wight’ or within 10 miles of island – I’m not sure this takes us any further, but I do wonder if after so long a B-26 looks like a C-47 when having been underwater for so long?
42-106745 – P-51B
42-67456 – P-38J
42-106626 – P-51B
43-28702 – P-38
42-96190 – B-26B
42-67479 – P-38J
41-31904 – B-26B
43-31769 – UC-78
You mean something like this?
it says, and I quote: Plane crashed in English Channel’, so no help there.
You mean the Souches?
Not only did it look good, but it also sounded very very different to the Hind with that different exhaust system!
Any comments from any of the moderators as to if this could be tried?
Old Warden without doubt. The setting is just perfect and for someone that hasn’t been to an airshow for 20 years you should find the close proximity of everything as well as the mix of Rotaries, biplanes and modern things such as the Avro 19 and Lysander. A Saturday evening show is predominantly a/c from the ‘Collection’ awash in evening sunlight or a Sunday show will provide for a few visiting a/c as well.
Did I say awash in evening sunlight? maybe just awash; this is England after all.
I’ll be at Shuttleworth this weekend as usual – Did Victor Meldrew have a target on his back? *grins* (see other threads). But seriously there is always something special about Old Warden – as long as they dont have that AWFUL Jeremy Spake on the mic – maybe they should get Kate Humble?
I always take an interest when Ms Humble appears, but this programme was a cracker.
Top marks too go to whoever dug out the film. Though some of it was misplaced and not relevant to what was being discussed, much of it was footage I haven’t seen before certainly.
Moggy
A big ‘well done’ to the BBC not only for this programme, but also for this particular edition! On a personal level I find Kate Humble difficult to watch, she’s far too ‘jolly hockey-sticks’ and always looks like she’s been dragged through a hedge backwards for me, but there ya go, just call me Victor Meldrew! As has been said elsewhere, it does graphically demonstrate how so quickly family history – even as recent as this – can get lost!
As for ‘whoever dug out the film’ it was probably Ian Thirsk, RAF Museum Film Archivist (he also of Salisbury Hall fame) who, following in the footsteps of Jim Ashton has for years been conserving and cateloging the collection and has an almost encyclopedic knowledge of what it contains.
When I did our Rapide items, I used warm soapy water and a toothbrush. Finished them off with Mr Sheen furniture polish…. gave them a lovely gleam!
Graham, though I admire the reasoning of your first post, your post number #10 is utter tosh!
It really is a bit simplistic to just copy an internet list of the 707 accidents without proper investigation, most of them don’t even appear to be any fault of the aircraft itself, ie terrorism, weather, crew related etc. Also many more 707s were built than Comets and were used in higher numbers for a far longer period, so they were bound to have a higher service accident count.
For the true picture you really need to do comparison lists and percentages of the two types.As much as we can admire the Comet (and I do very much) you can’t escape from the fact that some were lost (in lower amounts than usually quoted) to design and stressing faults in the design. What didn’t help was that the dramatic accidents occured early in their life, and in the infancy of the jet airliner story, and thus still very high profile and news worthy – along with the investigations afterwards.
As for the other silliness, the Comet was the first solely designed and practical jet airliner to fly and to be put into regular passenger service.
The Viking (6/4/48), Tudor 8 (6/9/48), and Lancastrian (was this ever pure jet?) were conversions of existing airframes all for trials and research work. The Ashton (1/9/50) was a pure jet design from the outset, built for research work within the MoS and RAE.
Canadas’ Avro Jetliner first flew on the 10 August 1949 and came to nowt.The Comet was a truely oustanding design of the day and more aerodynamically advanced than other commercial types of the time, it should be celebrated as an aviation milestone (even if it’s a British Icarus type affair), after the initial problems the Comet 4 went on to excellent world service, and was always considered a delight to fly in.
Finally and at last someone has seen what I was trying to demonstrate – I was wondering how long it would take! Indeed it IS far too simplistic to quote a list of accidents and incidents relating to a single type without doing a balanced and detailed study – but that is exactly what so many Comet detractors do, for some reason particularly those who love to sing the praises of Boeing in the context of the 707, so I was just using their own style of arguments back at them!
They quote the same old argument of ‘Comets fell out of the sky’ without anything further – which is a complete dismissal of something that was unknown at the time and that totally ignores all the groundbreaking work done by many people including the RAE and DH to discover what happened – the results of which was made freely available to all.
It also needs to be said that since that terrible Channel Four programme that murdered the Comet – despite it going to Broadcasting Complaints I hear people still say ‘ that De Havillands knew… the Government knew… BOAC knew… there was a cover-up etc etc etc’. Which has been proven was completely NOT the case!
Simplistic arguments never tell the complete story – nor does partisan hype based on marketing and publicity hyperbole (as anyone following the KC-X refuelling tanker saga will know). – only balanced discussion based on detailed research can tell the true story.
I’ve been hearing a lot of talk on and off over the years about Marshall’s moving to Alconbury, and also making use of the A1/A14/railway line to turn it into a major transport hub. We’ve been trying to get an author to do an Airfield Focus on it for some time now, with no luck. Given the length of the runway and the links – makes a lot of sense to me!
Thanks for that – I thought I’d seen comments about the Ashton being “First to Fly!” 🙁
The Comet, the Ashtons, the Avro Canada jetliner were all very close together – the Avro Canada C102 first flew 10 August 1949. All were pure-jet designs from the outset, the Ashton being a derivative of the Tudor (the Mk 9) with four turbojets and a nosewheel undercarriage. The Nene Viking first flew 6 April 1948, converted from the piston-engined production batch it was only a test machine.