dark light

Poliocretes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 35 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Black 57 is…. #906678
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Yes, that’s the one, though better known as the Black Spitfire. Ezer Weizman is actually shown in the video, the still of a young man next to a propellor.

    in reply to: The mighty IDF/AF #2231681
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Syria-confirms-Israeli-airstrike-warns-Israel-against-endangering-stability-in-region-345848

    Air force strikes Syrian targets in response to border fence bombing
    Assad regime confirms fatality; PM: We will attack those who attack us.

    The Israel Air Force attacked Syrian military targets early Wednesday morning in response to a border bombing of an IDF patrol the previous day on the northern Golan Heights.

    The IDF said it targeted army command posts, artillery batteries and a training base on the Syrian side of the Heights that it said enabled the detonation of an explosive charge on Tuesday, wounding four paratroopers, one seriously.

    The attack is the largest on Syria that Israel has acknowledged since the start of the Syrian civil conflict three years ago.

    It is the second IDF action against Syrian regime targets in hours. On Tuesday, IDF artillery units struck Syrian army posts within minutes of the border incident.

    Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said the targets hit were chosen because they “allowed and assisted in yesterday’s terror attack.”

    “We will not tolerate any infringement of our sovereignty or harm to our soldiers and civilians,” he said. “We will respond resolutely and powerfully to anyone who acts against us, at any time and place, as we’ve done tonight.”

    Ya’alon said Israel viewed Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime as being responsible for what occurs in its territory. He warned that if it continued to cooperate with terrorist elements seeking to harm Israel, it would pay a heavy price, one that would cause it “to regret its actions.”

    The defense minister vowed to continue to act “responsibly, and with good judgment, to safeguard the security of Israeli civilians.”

    Damascus later confirmed that air strikes targeted its military sites near the Golan Heights, adding that they killed one soldier and wounded seven others. In a statement, the Syrian army accused Israel of violating international law and of making “desperate attempts to escalate the situation.”

    The statement stopped short of any direct threat of retaliation and affirmed its focus on defeating insurgents.

    Hours after the IAF action in Syria, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, speaking at the weekly cabinet meeting that was postponed from Sunday because of Purim, said that the targets hit belonged to Syrian elements who not only allowed the attack to take place, but assisted in it.

    “Our policy is very clear,” he said. “We attack those who attack us.”

    Netanyahu said that Israel, to the best of its ability, consistently thwarts the transfer of weapons. This policy, he said, has resulted in a situation where over the past year, and indeed over the past five years since he has been in power, the level of terrorism has been low.

    “Last year it was the lowest level in a decade, both in the number of fatalities and in the firing of missiles and rockets,” he said. “From time to time it is necessary to take aggressive action, as we are doing now, to ensure that the quiet continues.”

    Netanyahu said this policy was responsible for the fact that Israel is the most secure and stable country in a Middle East that is “undergoing profound turmoil.”

    in reply to: Tally of A2A kills since 2000 #2231658
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    I’ll keep Israeli-Syrian kills as there appears to be enough meat to the story.

    What meat? An ancient article in ACIG that nothing has since come of? This is nonsical.

    in reply to: The mighty IDF/AF #2243274
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    way to downplay the 200+ air to air victories by the Israelis during that war.
    http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_264.shtml

    good job Baghdad Bob

    The link you’ve provided specifies kills for the July 1967 – September 1973 inter-war period, including the War of Attrition. Israel officialy claims 60 air to air victories for the June 1967 war. This is the link you’re looking for: http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_261.shtml

    in reply to: The mighty IDF/AF #2244016
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Seriously, there’s more to the IDF/AF than who are better, Chinese or Arab pilots. Tommorow is Yom Kippur and Israel is marking the 40th anniversary of that war (according to the Jewish calendar). A former navigator with 107 squadron (An F-16I of which is depicted above) published a day-by-day account of that squadron’s exploits during the war at an amazing thread on an Israeli military forum. Even if you don’t get the language, the pictures alone are worth it: http://www.fresh.co.il/vBulletin/showthread.php?t=580055

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]220716[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]220717[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]220718[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Israeli losses to Syrian AF 1982? #2332581
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Israel has never claimed to have lost no aircraft during the 1982 war, it claims to have lost none in air-to-air combat. Published Israeli losses during the 1982 war include an F-4 to Syrian SAMs in July, a pair of UH-1s, an A-4 Skyhawk, a pair of AH-1 Cobras and an MD-500, and that’s just off the top of my head.

    The Syrians make multiple claims, Russian publications make others, but to date there is nothing to substantiate these claims. No kill shots, no POW pilots and no wreckage. Some can be dismissed out of hand, the E-2 for instance. Israel received four, 3 were sold to Mexico and the last is in the IAF museum.

    The damaged F-15 claim is also true, I’ll try to find the photos.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2368940
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Syrian Il-28:

    http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/72172-clashes-near-syria-airports-as-army-bombs-golan

    I find it hard to believe those were operational even before the war begun. Those Il-28s should be 40-50 years old by now.

    in reply to: Syria says Israeli warplanes hit military site #2249095
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    On the contrary, it has EVERYTHING to do with today’s attack. Oh and i’m affraid there’s nothing for you to hold your own to, if you would actually try to justify your country’s actions in the last decades. And again, like other compatriots of yours, you try to insinuate that the well argumented, unanimous criticism of your country’s actions and policies, coming from pretty much every corner of the civilized world, has only to do with the “fact” that according to your culture (which “fact” is indoctrinated into your every citizen from the day they’re born, disturbingly), everybody hates you because you’re… jewish, rather that having to do with your country’s obvious actions in the last decades, actions visible to every educated enough person. I wonder how many of your fellow countrymen have the strength of character to look in the mirror and say “you know, maybe we’re doing something wrong here after all?”. Mind you , last i know , these peoples, israelis which indeed have strength of character are shunned and bullied in your country, it is not “politically correct” in your country to boycott your settlements, for example.

    But i guess, it’s much easier to bury one’s head in the sand and blame others, everyone else but themselves for your own failures and mistakes.

    Anyway, enough from me, i guess you’re already categorizing peoples who say things i do as “anti-semites”, evil anti-jews who want to demonize, delegitimize Israel or whatever, which obviously is nothing further from the truth, but i doubt you can see and understand that from your unfortunately very narrow ( mostly religious based-which probably it’s not your fault , as it’s been indoctrinated in your mind since you were a little kid, as i mentioned above) view of the world around. Pity.

    Nice rant, mack, but if you truly believe that there’s nothing for me to hold my own to, it just goes to show which among us has the narrow world view. I mean, seriously, you can’t even fathom someone having a differing opinion!
    You don’t know the first thing about me, you don’t know what my opinions about the Arab Israeli conflict are, yet nevertheless afford yourself such assumptions as what my world view is based on! Not only do you presume that I’ve had a religious upbringing (oh so totally wrong), yet even have the gall to patronize me as some victim! The simple fact is that I haven’t said anything about anti-semitism – you’re the one who keeps bringing it up. You assume to know me merely by my nationality and yet have the nerve of accusing me of categorizing people! The above screed isn’t about me, it’s nothing but a collection of stereotypes, figments of your rabid imagination. Your arrogance is quite astounding.

    in reply to: Syria says Israeli warplanes hit military site #2249524
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Irrelevant, as we’re talking about Israel and Syria here. I see though you have carefully avoided the colonist/occupation issue, i thought at least you’ll try to “convince” me/us that we’re wrong and what Israel does there is perfectly ok, it’s in the bible, there was no one there when they invaded or other stuff like that…

    Anyway , this looks “good”. I think we were all laughing at that guy who came last year i think going on about financial astrology or something ridiculous like that, who was predicting ( or some of the financial astrologists) a world war -or at least another big war- in the 2013-2015 time frame. I ain’t feel like laughing now.

    Your concern for me is touching, mack. You should work on your ridicule, though, it’s not very subtle, a little crass. Really unbecoming.
    Don’t worry, I can hold my own in discussions about the Arab-Israeli conflict. I simply did not want to pollute this thread with endless and pointless discussions about a subject that is of little relevance to yesterday’s strikes. If you’re satisfied with an explanation in which Israel is somehow uniquely nefarious, that is it not a country like countless others but rather a uniquely criminal entity, I don’t see this discussion coming to anything.

    In this case , it is the Right of Hezbollah (Palestine) to legaly fire rockets at Israel .
    Cheers .

    Come on, Bluewings, try harder. Hezbullah is not a Palestinian organization, it’s a Shiite Lebanese faction.

    in reply to: Syria says Israeli warplanes hit military site #2249612
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Until then, they have no right to even open their mouth.

    Honestly, I preferred Bluewings’s voltairian sentiments. Perhaps you should ask the moderators to have me banned. Just out of curiosity, are there others that have no right no open their mouths, other than Israelis?

    in reply to: Syria says Israeli warplanes hit military site #2249696
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    ??:confused: Irrelevant .

    Intervention in Mali is LEGAL .

    Cheers .

    I didn’t say otherwise, but let’s not fool ourselves into believing that France intervened in Mali because it’s LEGAL. It intervened in Mali because it could and wanted to.
    Besides, saying it is not LEGAL, does not make it so. As Israel is at a state of war with both Lebanon and Syria; as the proliferation of weapons systems, let alone chemical weapons, to terrorist organizations such as the Hizbullah is not in any form legal (or intelligent, or smart); and as Israel has every right to protect its citizens from the introduction of such weaponry into the hands of an organization committed to its destruction, Israel is perfectly within in rights to act.

    in reply to: Syria says Israeli warplanes hit military site #2249707
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    The bombing is aimed at stopping chemical weapons and advanced weapon systems from seeping from Syria’s arsenal into the hands or Iran’s proxies in Lebanon, a somewhat more immediate (both politically and geographically) danger to Israel than Jihadists in Mali pose to either France or the UK.

    What is it Harris said you sow the wind you reap the whirlwind

    It’s from the Bible, Hosea 8.

    in reply to: Future of Syrian Air Force #2254041
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    The future of the Syrian Air Force will only become apparent once the political situation in Syria sorts itself out. No matter what, however, it will be greatly diminished for the near future, even if Assad remains in power. With the need to rebuild, Syria will not have the money to invest in its air force, which it has long ago neglected in favor of other branches of the military.
    The SAF will certainly suffer immensely if an Islamic government, hostile to both the west and Russia, comes to power. An alignment with Russia is more likely, and that will improve the SAF’s prospects. But with the cold war over, it will be some time before it becomes a significant force. A western-aligned government will probably not need a strong air force, as such a scenario diminishes the chances of any confrontation with Syria’s immediate neighbors. In short, it’s hard to see the SAF becoming formidable enough to offer any challenge to either the IDFAF or TuAF, at least in the coming years.

    in reply to: Oldest combat aircraft still in service #2259173
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Israeli A-4s entered service in 1967 and were flying leaflet-dropping missions over Gaza last November.

    in reply to: Is Israel saving Iron Dome for a bigger threat? #1791348
    Poliocretes
    Participant

    Israel is firing a $40,000 missile for every $2000 rocket that HAMAS is firing . IDF must find a cost effective solution. Iron Dome is effective but expensive.

    Not everything is measured by money. Iron Dome protects the Israeli civilian population, thereby providing the Israeli government with more room to maneuver. Had the 200+ rockets intercepted over the past few days fallen on Israel’s towns, the resulting outcry would have almost certainly forced the government to order an immediate ground offensive, with the ensuing mess that would entail.

    Besides, when calculating the cost of Iron Dome, one also has to take into effect the economic damage caused by the rockets. Plus, it provides one hell of a sales pitch.

    Totally worth it. Amir Peretz, the former defense minister who funded the system despite the misgivings of many experts in the defense establishment, is a national hero.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 35 total)