dark light

Stealth Spy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2581764
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Sources:
    1-The American Fighter, Enzo Angelucci and Peter Bowers, Orion, 1987.
    2-Combat Aircraft F-16, Doug Richardson, Crescent, 1992.
    3-United States Military Aircraft Since 1909, Gordon Swanborough and Peter M. Bowers, Smithsonian, 1989.
    4-F-16 Fighting Falcon–A Major Review of the West’s Universal Warplane, Robert F. Dorr, World Airpower Journal, Spring 1991.
    5-Hornet, Robert F. Dorr, World Air Power Journal, Spring 1990, p. 38.
    6-McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Since 1920: Volume II, Rene J. Francillon, Naval Institute Press, 1990.
    7-Northrop YF-17: The Fighter They Didn’t Want, Bill Gunston, Wings of Fame, Vol 1, 1996.

    Thanks for the info but really, did you read up all those books for a few lines :confused: ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2582016
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Pakistan’s technical contribution was 0%,…
    So the FC-1 is near 100% CAC project.

    Is it for this reason that only pakistan refers to the jet as “joint-fighter” and has named it Joint Fighter – 17 while China has only calls it FC-1 / Xiao Long (?)

    Another question : I know about the advantages of DSI, but what advantages/benefits does LREX provide ?

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2582018
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Now i was thinking – could pakistan have helped by providing chinese acess to its F-16’s … many reports assert that the chinese reverse engineered components from pakistani F-16’s for the FC-1 (& J-10)

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2582526
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    I will rate J-10 in EF class and FC-1 with advanced block 52 in terms of tech and agility.

    ๐Ÿ˜€

    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Question : Who’s making the new Al-41’s ? India are said to have alredy contaced its makers.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2582581
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Question : What is Pakistan’s technical (not financial) contribution to the FC-1/JF-17 ?

    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Hmmm…another Russian site reads (acknowledges the same thing):

    Rosoboronexport, a Russian arms dealer, has clinched a contract worth more than $500 million to supply to China 150 AL-31F jet engines manufactured by Moscow’s machine building production association Salyut. The engines will be installed on Su-27SKM fighters assembled in China under license.

    This is the third contract in 2005 to deliver Salyut products to China. Late in June, Rosoboronexport signed an agreement with Beijing to deliver in the course of two years 100 AL-31FN engines for light J-10 fighters, also known as Super-10. The deal was worth $350 million. Experts estimate that China’s overall demand for AL-31FN engines will be 250 units, which may bring Russia about $900 million. Evidently, after taking delivery of the first shipment of 100 engines, China will sign a new agreement with Rosoboronexport for more Salyut engines.

    Additionally, Salyut signed a contract in May with Beijing worth $100 million to supply in the course of three years spare parts for Su-27SK and Su-30MK2 fighter engines, earlier delivered to China or assembled under a license at a Shenyang plant. Salyut was able to negotiate this contract without the state intermediary, because it has the right to supply spare parts and conduct maintenance on its own. This right was granted to it in September 2002 and extended last September for another three years.

    As a result, this year alone Salyut’s order book rose by one billion US dollars thanks to engine supplies to China.

    http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20051216/42517133.html

    :confused: Do the last 2 paras imply that the other contracts were only for engines ($350m + $500m) and the additional one (worth $100m) was only for spares :confused:

    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    This would certainly seem to suggest that the WS-10A will not be fitted to production J-10s until at leat 2010, if at all.
    As for the J-11, this a bit more obscure. There is a series of pictures floating around that claim to show a J-11 flying with 1 AL-31 and 1 WS-10A. Im not sure what the status of the indigenous systems the chinese have been developing for the J-11 is (radar for instance), but these may give a clue to the status of the WS-10A for the J-11.

    Yes but the article clearly says the Russian engines are for the Chinese made Su-27’s (a.k.a J-11). And that’s the same airplane the WS-10 is supposed to power first. Does that mean the WS-10 is far away from powering the J-11’s ?? :confused:

    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    They were originally ordering around 250 AL-31FN engines to be delivered for around five to six years and a Russian general spilled the beans around last December that it was a done deal. Then at the last moment the deal was pulled and a new deal was inked several months later for only 100. So you can imagine what only happened to cause this change of mind.

    If you build around 50, the remaining 50 will be used as spares for the existing fleet, which adds to around another 54 already built. It will probably take the factory one to two years to build that next 50 planes.

    Well this post of yours was dated October 2005.

    And here’s an article about an additional Chinese engine purchase in December 2005. (in addition to the earlier 100 Al-31’s in ~ July 2005 > link )

    China Buys Russian Jet Engines Wholesale
    Rosoboronexport, the state military export company, sealed a $500 million contract to supply China with jet engines of Moscow-based Salyut engineering plant. [u]The engines will be installed on Russian Su-27SKM fighters assembled in China[/u] under the Russian license.

    [u]The contract of Rosoboronexport and China stipulates for deliveries of 150 engines of the AL-31F model developed for the Su-27/Su-30 jet series. The engines will be used for the assembling of Su-27SK fighters at a plant in Shenyang.[/u]

    This is the third contract of Salyut on engines supply to China this year. Late June, the state arms export company signed a contract with Beijing to deliver 100 AL-31FN engines within 2 years for the J-10. The deal was $350 million worth.

    Experts estimate Chinaโ€™s need in AL-31FN engines at 250 items, which may bring Russia some $900 million. To all appearances, after China gets the first lot of 100 engines, it will sign a new agreement with Rosoboronexport.

    http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?id=636003

    So there you have 250 engines (100+150) ordered as initially stated and this number has not been reduced by the developments on the WS-10.

    Surely these deliveries will span a few years; can it thus be assumed that although the WS-10 has made impressive progress, it is still far from entering service on the Su-27’s it is intended to power ??? :confused:

    in reply to: Accidents with the Indian and Chinese fighters Su-27/30 #2582964
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    India :

    In September 2003 and again in December of the same year, the local media reported that some of the AL-31F turbofans had to be overhauled prematurely, after completing an average of “700 Hrs”, instead of the advertised 1000. The cause of this was described as “nicks” in the turbofan blades, and the whole squadron was reported to be completely “grounded”. The IAF dismissed these allegations as only rumours, but admitted that some engines had developed these problems in their blades. Unfortunately, the accuracy of media reporting can be questioned considering that simultaneusly aircraft were appearing all over the country for aerobatic events in public events! In various interviews, IAF Chief ACM Krishnaswamy rejected the media reports as cynicism and stressed that blade nicks, which appear due to pebble ingestion, do happen and there is nothing unusual and specific to the sukhois.

    China :
    http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/8619/su27crash5gj.jpg

    2002 April. Allegedly, an SU-30 was said to have crashed into the side of the mountain. While there is no direct proof of the accident, there are reports and rumors of officer turnovers suggestive of a backlash from possible attrition in exercises. This was denied by Sukhoi in a press release February 2003.

    – Crobato

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2585499
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    LOLOL …. Look where this is coming from ๐Ÿ˜€

    [u]’Jet capabilities, not politics, should determine contract ‘[/u]

    Associated Press
    Singapore, February 21, 2006

    Lockheed Martin Corp, the biggest US defence contractor, on Tuesday downplayed the potential effect of Washington’s political influence on India’s planned purchase of 126 new fighter jets. Lockheed is competing with an array of airplane makers, to sell jets to India in a deal worth at least $8 billion ($6.7 billion). Both governments are working on a civilian nuclear deal, and US President George W Bush plans to visit India next month.

    Lockheed believes its multi-role F-16 Fighting Falcon would “offer a tremendous capability to the Indian Air Force,” as it could be tailored to meet different requirements and was relatively affordable, said June Shrewsbury, Lockheed’s general manager for F-16 programs.

    Asked whether improving ties between Washington and New Delhi might benefit Lockheed, Shrewsbury said [u][i]the company believes it deserves to win the order on merit.[/u][/i]

    “We hope that the competition is based on the capabilities, the affordability, the industrial cooperation program that each contractor offers,” she told reporters on the sidelines of the Asian Aerospace exhibition in Singapore. [u]”We think that in that kind of competition, the F-16 would win hands down.”[/u] India is expected to seek formal proposals soon from aircraft manufacturers for the purchase, and the bidding process could take several years.

    A key factor for India in choosing new planes is the supplier’s commitment to share technologies to make spare parts, and to develop and produce aircraft in India.

    Lockheed, which is based in Bethesda, Maryland, has previously said it hopes to collaborate with India’s state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. on the development and co-production of fighter jets.

    However, some analysts believe India is likely to be wary of the United States as a sole supplier, since Washington imposed sanctions on India in 1998 after it conducted nuclear tests. The restrictions were later lifted.

    link

    These statements are made in Singapore. What irony :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2585653
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    The Kaveri will be ready faster and the MRCA might be won by them as well.

    I smell the Rafale’s victory in the MRCA … and Secma’s in the engine partnership process.

    Surely this thing about helping out on the Kaveri is being used to leverage India in this MRCA thing. However it looks like France’s offer of having the Kaveri’s in the Rafale has gone off well.

    Check this :

    PARIS (Reuters) – French aero engine maker Snecma has won preferred-partner status to develop the Kaveri engine for the latest set of Indian fighter planes, French paper La Tribune reported on Monday.

    It said that [u]Snecma won preferred-bidder status over Russian rival NPO Saturn and U.S. group Pratt & Whitney.[/u]

    La Tribune reported that French President Jacques Chirac, who is currently visiting India, was due to endorse Snecma’s offer during his trip.

    http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticleSearch.aspx?storyID=148670+20-Feb-2006+RTRS&srch=snecma

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2585677
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    Kaveri on Rafales … the French offer ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    And in a major move, French aviation engine giant, [u]Secma, which is bidding for DRDO’s joint collaboration project on the Kaveri engines, has offered to mount them in two Rafale fighters.[/u]:o Snecma is already collaborating with public sector Hindustan Aeronautics Limited on production of aero engines powering the Advanced Light Helicopters.

    Full Article >>

    Since the specs of the Kaveri are more or less the same as that of the M88-3, the French offer must be very tempting. – The Kaveri will be ready(so DRDO and MoD are happy) and the IAF gets Rafales (so its happy as well).

    2 birds with one stone – nice move ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Mirage Pulled Out Of Indian MMRCA Race #2586038
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    [quote]

    [u]Chirac takes off, fighter in pocket[/u] ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜€

    French President Jacques Chirac (alredy in India), is expected to offer the Rafale fighter aircraft for an Indian Air Force order of multi-role combat aircraft that could top $8 billion.

    The Rafale is a fourth-generation fighter aircraft and its first technology demonstrator was built in 1984-85 and exhibited its prowess with touch- and-go landings on the deck of the Clemenceau, the asbestos-laden French aircraft carrier that Chirac has ordered back to France in the middle of its voyage to the Alang shipbreaking yard in Gujarat. {Greenpeace = Ecoterrists}

    France was in the running in the IAF competition with Dassault Aviationโ€™s Mirage 2000-V but the company is understood to have conveyed to India that it cannot keep its assembly lines running in expectation of the air force order.

    The Rafale is heavier and more expensive than the Mirage โ€” a variant of which is already operational in the IAF โ€” but it is under production.

    Rafale is also a Dassault product and incorporates avionics and systems from, among others, Thales, which last year won the $3.5-billion Scorpene submarine order from the Indian Navy.

    The first squadrons of the Rafale in the French Air Force are expected to be operational in six months and projected orders for the aircraft from Franceโ€™s air force and navy are for 300 aircraft.

    But the IAF expects more manufacturers, including the Eurofighter Typhoon, to formally bid for the order once the global tender is issued.

    The IAF was interested in taking a look at the F-16 with the Active Electronic Scanned Array (AESA) radar which Washington is yet to clear for the manufacturers to present to India.

    [u]The French are likely to offer the Rafale with the AESA for which Dassault has roped in two companies, Thales and SNECMA.

    http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060219/asp/nation/story_5866525.asp

    No wonder that the AESA development for the new RB2E is on (with the order for France being cut from 59 to 51)

    in reply to: Mirage Pulled Out Of Indian MMRCA Race #2587051
    Stealth Spy
    Participant

    The defence delegation accompanying the french president, led by defence minister Michele Alliot-Marie, is expected to inform the South Block that upgrading infrastructure for the Rafale will not be an expensive proposition since it takes much from the Mirage family itself.

    http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=117822

    Come on … is this really true ?

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 337 total)