dark light

seahawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 3,269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #487399
    seahawk
    Participant

    ?
    I don’t grasp your context here?

    If Airbus gets even longer delays then Boeing with the 787, we will see how good Boeing did with the revolutionary 787.

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #487641
    seahawk
    Participant

    Wait for A350 to see what the 787 problems were worth.

    in reply to: Predict the winners! #2448595
    seahawk
    Participant

    Swiss competition: Rafale
    Indian MRCA: F-18E
    Brazil FX: Rafale
    Libya Flanker and Rafale
    Nederlands: F-35

    in reply to: Predict the winners! #2452919
    seahawk
    Participant

    Swiss competition: Rafale
    Indian MRCA: F-18E
    Brazil FX: Rafale
    Libya Flanker and Rafale
    Nederlands: F-35

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2448598
    seahawk
    Participant

    there’s a lot more to it than simply fitting a LDP and A2A missiles..what materials was the F-4 made of ? metallic alloys and titanium mostly. the Tejas on the other hand has more composites than most of the currently flown 4th generation fighters. and what about the F-4’s FBW ? mechanical.
    The Tejas has a quadruplex all digital FBW, 2 generations ahead of the F-4.

    Who would have guessed this? However Tejas is currently not even a finally defined product. No engien, no radar, no final avionics set.

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2452922
    seahawk
    Participant

    there’s a lot more to it than simply fitting a LDP and A2A missiles..what materials was the F-4 made of ? metallic alloys and titanium mostly. the Tejas on the other hand has more composites than most of the currently flown 4th generation fighters. and what about the F-4’s FBW ? mechanical.
    The Tejas has a quadruplex all digital FBW, 2 generations ahead of the F-4.

    Who would have guessed this? However Tejas is currently not even a finally defined product. No engien, no radar, no final avionics set.

    in reply to: F-22 export not likely……….. #2448928
    seahawk
    Participant

    If you look at ti closely one will see that the denial of F-22 exports was primarily aimed at Israel and nobody else.At the time polticians did not care if other customers might be interested in the future. Today Australia and Japan could easily get the export licencse if the political will would be there, which is not. But not because the US does not trust them, but because they won´t finance F-35, if they buy F-22. Any F-22 export puts a dent into F-35 and the numbers needed to make it cheap enough. Althoug for countries like Australia a smaller number of F-22 + a force of legacy planes like F-18E/F makes more sense, then a complete F-35 fleet. Which msotly is a good afordable bomb truck.

    in reply to: F-22 export not likely……….. #2453263
    seahawk
    Participant

    If you look at ti closely one will see that the denial of F-22 exports was primarily aimed at Israel and nobody else.At the time polticians did not care if other customers might be interested in the future. Today Australia and Japan could easily get the export licencse if the political will would be there, which is not. But not because the US does not trust them, but because they won´t finance F-35, if they buy F-22. Any F-22 export puts a dent into F-35 and the numbers needed to make it cheap enough. Althoug for countries like Australia a smaller number of F-22 + a force of legacy planes like F-18E/F makes more sense, then a complete F-35 fleet. Which msotly is a good afordable bomb truck.

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2449025
    seahawk
    Participant

    Oh dear, my beloved F-4 just made it to 4.5 generation fighter. It has carried a Litening pod and fired AAMs as well and it even has a final and proven engine, no it has 2 of theose.

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2453375
    seahawk
    Participant

    Oh dear, my beloved F-4 just made it to 4.5 generation fighter. It has carried a Litening pod and fired AAMs as well and it even has a final and proven engine, no it has 2 of theose.

    in reply to: German Luftwaffe Pics and Infos #2449091
    seahawk
    Participant

    Money, During the cold war the UH-1D was enough to shuttle around personal and weapons behind in the rear, when the need changed they already had signed for NH90.

    in reply to: German Luftwaffe Pics and Infos #2453442
    seahawk
    Participant

    Money, During the cold war the UH-1D was enough to shuttle around personal and weapons behind in the rear, when the need changed they already had signed for NH90.

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2449097
    seahawk
    Participant

    It is a very daring move to say that Mk.2 will be ready and up to other 4.5 Generation fighters by 2015-16 (which means Block F3 Rafale, Gripen NG and Tranche 3 Typhoons) when we do not even know which engine it will have.

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2453447
    seahawk
    Participant

    It is a very daring move to say that Mk.2 will be ready and up to other 4.5 Generation fighters by 2015-16 (which means Block F3 Rafale, Gripen NG and Tranche 3 Typhoons) when we do not even know which engine it will have.

    in reply to: Nice XF8U-3 Crusader III video clip. #2449639
    seahawk
    Participant

    Do you have a pic with 7 missiles. I thought it was capable of only 5.

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 3,269 total)