dark light

merkle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 960 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Scrap Light aircraft ?? #432383
    merkle
    Participant

    I’d start with the very active Luscombe Owners Club.

    Moggy

    Ahhh, thanks Moggy !!!

    I never knew such a group existed !!!

    I will try and conact them ,:D

    in reply to: sad airplanes #1190253
    merkle
    Participant

    It is one of the Horton wings that are in the states and stored for one of the large national museums.

    Shame to see it in such a corodded state though:(,

    LOVE to see that puppy FLY 😀

    in reply to: Rusty radial #1190263
    merkle
    Participant

    (1) memorial yes, war no
    (2) you may dare and, in doing so, you would be right
    (3) if you mean old in the sense of historic, you’re correct, but if it is in the sense of former, you’re very wrong because it’s still very active

    Memorial to a very long standing Historicic, But active airfield,????:confused:

    ,are we getting warmer ??

    in reply to: Scrap Light aircraft ?? #432389
    merkle
    Participant

    Anyone know where I could get a Silvaire instrument panel from,??
    or know of a dealer who sells redundant (civil Parts) is there any in the UK, or are they all in the USA ??:confused: things like panels ,sticks ,bits a bobs ??

    in reply to: Rusty radial #1190372
    merkle
    Participant

    It looks more like a Rotary??

    Bruce

    I agree, that looks Very primative, doesnt look complecated enough for a Radial, and look at how straight the pots are ,

    it looks like it is mounted on a war memorial, dare I say in France, a memorial to a old airfield, ??:confused:

    in reply to: Harrier XV806 #1191095
    merkle
    Participant

    Roger,

    If you can believe Wikipedia, it has this to say….

    “Harrier GR.3s were operated by the RAF from Hermes, and provided close support to the ground forces and attacked Argentine positions. but were unable to destroy the Port Stanley runway. If most of the Sea Harriers had been lost, the GR.3s would have replaced them in air patrol duties. Four Harriers GR.3s were lost to ground fire, accidents, or mechanical failure.[6] The RAF Harriers would not see further combat, as the Hawker Siddeley airframes were replaced by the larger Harrier II developed jointly by McDonnell Douglas and British Aerospace.”

    I certainly recall them carrying ‘winders but i don’t believe any GR.3 v Argie air to air engagements happened.

    .

    Just Wondering, silly question really , but was the Su 25 Frogfoot, the Soviet
    equivelant for our GR harrier at that era of time ??

    that would be a nice set, a A10, a frogfoot and a Harrier ,somehow I think a A10 or a frogfoot would be hard to come by these days, although I did see on the forum, a picture on the scrapyard thread of a A10 being Buried in the desert,(Damaged) , its a bit far to go though, (Iraq for a cockpit) :diablo:

    and Yes I Know not much at all regarding frogfoots, Harriers etc etc, so you can beat me with a stick if it really is a daft qeustion :diablo:

    in reply to: Rolls Royce Merlin on ebay #1191251
    merkle
    Participant

    Aye, but it’s not just a little bit of paper – the traceabilty usually goes back to manufacture which adds a big headache. When I worked as an avionics tech, everything had to traceable, even items from cannablised units. As it was back then, only somebody with the correct approval could certify something without traceable paperwork, and only then it had to be in agreement with the OEM. So there is a reason why aircraft things get expensive. The manufacturer doesn’t know whether or not it’s going to an airworthy aircraft or one for static, therefore to avoid non-certified stuff going onto an airworthy aircraft, it’s all to the same standard…

    We get charged a fortune for Atchely servo valves for the ROV vehicles I now work with, soley due to this, despite us never getting airborne – we only fly underwater…..

    Again, regards the certification issue, there are plenty here on this forum will have a direct working knowledge of the rules, as I have been away from the aviation industry for 11 years, and I know CAA / JAA rules have changed since I left

    All the best,

    Scotty 🙂

    I agree with you on servicable stuff, It has to be Bonefide, as lives depend on it, its the “Collectables ” market i was refering to really,as even though technically a lot of it is dare i say scrap or U/S to requirements, it still hold high value .

    in reply to: Rolls Royce Merlin on ebay #1191563
    merkle
    Participant

    To the Above Post above, :D:D:D,
    EXELLENT ,LOL:diablo:

    in reply to: Rolls Royce Merlin on ebay #1191574
    merkle
    Participant

    That would make a nice donation to the hornet project! Not sure how much a merlin would run for nowadays keeping in mind to return it to run would cost a small fortune!

    Like a freind said to me who was a aircraft engineer,
    You go to Do it all DIY centre, and pick up a normal little Dashboard Lightbulb for 50 pence, (pennys, ) as soon as it has ANY conection with Aircraft, and has a bit of Paper, Add POUNDS to it, and yet to mine ,and his thinking, a light bulb , is a light bulb, is a light bulb,??,

    so what i am getting at is ANYTHING aircraft, Seems to hold Very High Prices,

    you could say the same for Vinatge Boats and equipment too, I suppose anything that has a collectable interest seems to hold in some respects, extremely High prices, Way of the world I suppose ,:diablo:, I wish it wasnt sometimes 😀

    in reply to: for Black Knight #1192645
    merkle
    Participant

    looks nice 😀

    makes a nice change to see a T-33 , what inspired you for “black Knight”

    in reply to: Another Iraqi Sea Fury? #1193749
    merkle
    Participant

    Rumoured to be somewhere in the UK, but has become somewhat political!

    Bruce

    AHHH, I see, Another Member of Parlaiment’s Pension ,;):D:diablo:

    in reply to: Buccaneers on the move! #1193930
    merkle
    Participant

    exellent to see, these Buccs are No tonka toy, I imagine it was extremely hard work to get them in this sort of shape,
    Great work.,
    dare i say Inspirational , and proves what can be done with a little dedication

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1194084
    merkle
    Participant

    Thankyou XF940 !!

    do you mean the AP books ?, I didnt know which perticular Volume was Needed, Hence the “Flinging” of qeustions, When and only When i manage to secure a project ,then I will get the AP, when I had the Canberra,I had a very thick AP for “Airframe” “repair and reconstruction” Vol 14, which was very in depth and I am sure is Invaluable to the lads who bought 887 at Upwood,
    due to its Buckled Nose section ,

    I have been keeping my eye out for a copy.

    by the way, did anyone know what happened to XJ727 ?? HAR10 Whirlwind which David remarks on in the above post ??, I have emailed the seller with No comeback as of yet ?

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1194281
    merkle
    Participant

    The Whirlwind cockpit structure comes off in the same way as a Wessex.

    Ahh Thanks David,

    That REALLY makes a difference, on a project i was chasing
    thanks for the advice 😉

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1194302
    merkle
    Participant

    Question about “Cab Roof ” Removal ,”whirlwinds” ??

    Hi i needed to pose a question to you experts out there,

    I was told and saw, that the wessex Cab(greenhouse) were designed to be un-bolted, and could be taken off quite easily ,

    Howevor I am unsure if it is the same with a Whirlwind, Does the Roof/Greenhouse on a Whirly Come off, Or are they simply Built into the superstructure,??

    it is a cockpit question i suppose, as to find a wessex with no greenhouse would not be a problem as a greenhouse could be located, However if the Whirlwind’s greenhouse is Built into the airframe, then I would steer clear of a whirlwind that has had its Canopy Cut off,

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 960 total)