dark light

scott.bouch

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 131 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: XS458 Lightning electric starter project update #1051542
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    any chance of a Mod combining all the previous XS458 starter threads into this one?

    Cheers a lot, Scott.

    in reply to: XS458 Lightning electric starter project update #1051545
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    No1 Engine power wiring 08-10-2011

    Had another great day on Saturday..

    http://xs458starter.posterous.com/

    We found a great way to get the cables in to No1 engine’s nose. By removing the igniter leads for the IPN starter, we were able to use the strut they occupied.

    Cables cut to length, and protected with fibre-glass tape.

    Now got to do some metalwork to mount the power connectors in two panels on the Port side. Need to pick up some crimp terminals, p-clips etc, for finishing off the cable installation! 😀

    Lots more photos on the blog: http://xs458starter.posterous.com/

    in reply to: ww2 pilots gear. #1051630
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    I’ve also been warned away form museum loans… problems are:

    • Sticky fingers – sadly theft does happen :dev2:
    • While it’s in the museum, it’s theirs to do as they wish to it, you’ll not have access as easily as they have to YOUR things
    • You have little say as to the display
    • Stuff can get accidentally damaged, loosing value and historical merit

    I wanted to put my helmet collection in a cabinet in a museum (possibly Coventry or East Mids), but was told that even If I provided my own cabinet and the helmets, they would keep the key to it – not me.

    It’s a great shame as I have getting on for about 30 flight helmets, and only get to display them once a year at the cockpitfest (Newark Air Museum). I would really like them to be on public display somewhere, just like your friend.

    If he’s still got the set the next time I do a display at cockpitfest, I’d gladly put them on display for the weekend, along with my stuff!

    Cheers, Scott.

    in reply to: C-47 on EDO floats #1051747
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Super little video! I want a floating C-47! What a great way to travel on your holidays!

    in reply to: Airborne Re-Enactor P7350 #1051771
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    I created my own helmet for when I fly the Fouga. It’s a white dual visor HGU-26 with a Scott leather edgeroll kit. The inside however is totally HGU-55 with leather earcups and TPL liner. Looks totally period correct but with modern comfort 🙂 Comms are standard mil, but I use a conversion cable from NATO to French plug.

    The HGU-26 with either the early flammable edgeroll, or the late snap-on edgeroll would be great for mixing it up with HGU-55 parts! although the styro-liner isn’t swappable, the earphones and TPL liner would be fine.

    So you have a converter form US NATO plug to UK / French NATO plug..

    Are you flying it with an Ulmer Mask? Are your comms French military (same spec as UK military) with the UK / French NATO Plug? Impedance-wise

    Which earphone speakers did you install? UK / French NATO impedance?

    Interesting though, this is an aircraft and pilot specific specimen to achieve the goal of looking correct, not so good for other aircraft and other pilots… This is the difficulty of trying to get it right in modern times!

    in reply to: Airborne Re-Enactor P7350 #1051806
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    I love to see the correct era gear in use with aircraft. I’m a collector myself, and it’s a passion of mine to get it right. But not everyone sees it that way. My collection is mainly helmets / headgear, so this is mainly from that point of view…

    It does come down to the operator, and their views on safety vs historical accuracy..

    Flight gear is usually the pilot’s own stuff, for fit, comfort, and hygiene reasons. As the pilot may fly for more than one operator, it would be up to him to have a selection of gear to suit many different aircraft types.. just impractical.

    If an operator was to hold gear for their aircraft, they would need a selection of sizes to suit all possible flyers. The gear would need cleaning, maintaining etc… like running a stores.

    Then there is the other issue of different headset impedances depending on the installed radio-set in the aircraft. You can’t just plug an American helmet into an British aircraft and expect it to work. Just like you can’t just plug an old C-type RAF helmet into a Spitfire with a modern GA radio installation. It would look right, but wouldn’t work very well.

    Oxygen is another matter. The people who operate Hunters, JP’s, Gnat’s will know about the different oxygen hose connectors. But then you also have an incompatibility of Pressure / Flow between US and UK systems, so you can’t swap masks about easily.. (even some current American masks are aircraft specific depending on flow / pressure)

    The Gnat has a unique oxygen connector, the only aircraft to have it. So the operator will have a couple of P/Q masks for pilots to use in their aircraft, but then you have the hygiene issue of multiple pilots / flyers using the same mask because of the aircraft.

    How many people actually care? Most pilots I’ve met couldn’t tell you what Mk of helmet they are wearing. Most see the gear as more of an inconvenience, than something to take an interest in. Quote: “a helmet is just a helmet isn’t it?”

    Look at one of the pilots that run the Bruntingthorpe Lightnings, he wears a white American USAF HGU-26 helmet, with it’s visor cover missing / broken. Totally wrong for the aircraft (the USAF never operated Lightnings!), but does he know it’s American? Does he even care? How many of the public crowd know, or even care? How many people have photos of that Lightning with the wrong helmet bobbing around in the cockpit?

    When we operate XS458 at Cranfield. We use a Mk3C helmet for our guests (quite correct for a Lightning) and our pilot uses a MK10 – not quite right for a lightning, but it’s his, it fits him and he’s comfortable with it.. and how many people would know… We don’t get it 100% right, and they have pedantic me on the team!!

    I’m all in favour of getting it right, for personal satisfaction, but most of the time, sadly, there are a whole host of reasons not to…

    The thrill of flying, and the safety of the aircraft are usually the most important things on the day… The historical accuracy of the photos is generally second.

    in reply to: Look inside a Lightning Video! #1073008
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Thanks for the positive comments!! 🙂

    in reply to: Shoreham Aerojumble – Sat 1 October 2011 #1076271
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Ha ha.. I’ve only just see your responses!

    Whinnie the Phoo vs aircraft memorabilia?? I think Whinnie the Phoo may win! :p

    in reply to: Shoreham Aerojumble – Sat 1 October 2011 #1077749
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Then cancel the holiday!

    Simples. 🙂

    Ha! No chance – this is our last one before the sproglet arrives! 😉

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #1077794
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    …never to fly again 🙁

    in reply to: Shoreham Aerojumble – Sat 1 October 2011 #1078012
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Really glad that Shoreham is up and running again, But alas, I can’t make it… will be on holiday!

    in reply to: Look inside a Lightning Video! #1078582
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Fascinating. Ever thought of potholing as a hobby?!

    Tried potholing a couple of times, and loved it too!

    in reply to: Look inside a Lightning Video! #1078626
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    Hi Deskpilot,

    I used to be able to squeeze down there too when I joined the Lightning team at Cranfield I was only 11 years old! Since then I’ve discovered beer and curry, so not much chance of fitting now!

    We left the intake blank,. and front cover sheets on simply because it was really windy at the weekend, and it’s really hard to re-sheet!!

    I’m not sure when the guide veins were fitted, but apparently they were to help stop the No2 engine starving of air. According to an ex RAF helper on 458, they were added to stop him and a WAAF getting up to their antics in air intakes!

    Cheers, Scott

    scott.bouch
    Participant

    yeah, great ok! 😉

    in reply to: General Discussion #290037
    scott.bouch
    Participant

    If there was ever a car I can’t afford, but lust after, it’s the E-Type…

    Luckily I get to play with a Lightning! 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 131 total)