My point was that I think that national governments should make sure that some of their most important industries remain owned by their own country.
The USA just did this last week with the Dubai ports deal, I wondered if people thought this was a good or a bad thing?
I had breaded Turkey breast, with sweetcorn, runner beans and southern fried potato waffles.
A big pile of chocolatey cornflake cakes to finish, mmm………….. :p 😀 😀
I had breaded Turkey breast, with sweetcorn, runner beans and southern fried potato waffles.
A big pile of chocolatey cornflake cakes to finish, mmm………….. :p 😀 😀
Here is an idea;
If US products are unsatisfactory, don’t buy them. If we are refused, cancel our order. We wouldn’t loose any workshare, as it is given to investors, which we are.
The UK still has an aerospace industry, and given some extra funds could develop new aircraft that we need, such as a Harrier II instead of the JSF. We could also buy Rafale if we so wished, and I am sure the Russians have a few Su35s spare if we get desperate.
On the nuclear issue, I say go it alone. We need a UK controlled deterrent, pure and simple.
By the way, regarding the idea that the UK would sell off the US technology from the JSF if we were given it:
If this is how you treat your best ally, who is willing to send off hundreds of her men and women to die in wars G.W.Bush wants to start on a whim, then what do you expect our reaction to be??? Its not just ungrateful, it shows that the US government has litttle regard for its international partners and is only out for what it can get and is prepared to $crew anyone to get it.
I’m not anti American by any measure, but i speak as i find, and in this case I think the US government should wake up and do the right thing for a change.
I imagine the article simply wishes to point out that the procurement of the F35 may not be the best option for Australia. Then again, what are the other options? Might we see some Flankers sporting kangaroo roundalls in a few years? :diablo: 😀 😀
Thanks Dimitri, we all appreciate your efforts, fabulous pics!!!
Britchy: Mate I think you misunderstand mate, this is the Royal Australian Navy not the Royal Navy. Sorry for the confusion mate.
Down here we don’t have the EH-101’s but the MRH-90’s are a good bet and this should see the RAN FAA with replacments of this type of helo sooner than the goverwas planing. With just five of these aircraft left you really must wonder how much use they can be now, especially when the fleet is mostly down due to maintanence problems.
MRH-90’s with FADEC do seem to make more sence in terms of operational service.
lol, thanks for clearing up the confusion, buddy 😀 😀
A duck’s quack does echo, but it does so at a frequency that humans simply cannot hear.
On a more interesting note:
Maize, Rice and wheat (which feed the majority of the world), are all types of over-grown grass.
A duck’s quack does echo, but it does so at a frequency that humans simply cannot hear.
On a more interesting note:
Maize, Rice and wheat (which feed the majority of the world), are all types of over-grown grass.
The army is buying 12 MRH90s?
Why do this when an indigenous heli (the EH101) is avaliable?
Gripen would be a better buy for Norway anyway. Its cheaper and gives more value for money, and fulfills all the Norwegian needs.
Shame. Terrible, terrible shame. RIP
Shame. Terrible, terrible shame. RIP
i agree with fabe. If a government can’t afford care for its own people, then it has no business buying espensive toys like these. Bangladesh faces no strategic threats at all, and i for one would much rather see the nearly $1billion they spend each year on defence on health, education and disaster relief.
Shame its not a rebuilt Avro arrow!