dark light

jbritchford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 1,693 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Foreign owned firms #1938468
    jbritchford
    Participant

    My point was that I think that national governments should make sure that some of their most important industries remain owned by their own country.

    The USA just did this last week with the Dubai ports deal, I wondered if people thought this was a good or a bad thing?

    in reply to: General Discussion #338687
    jbritchford
    Participant

    I had breaded Turkey breast, with sweetcorn, runner beans and southern fried potato waffles.

    A big pile of chocolatey cornflake cakes to finish, mmm………….. :p 😀 😀

    in reply to: WHATS FOR TEA #1938471
    jbritchford
    Participant

    I had breaded Turkey breast, with sweetcorn, runner beans and southern fried potato waffles.

    A big pile of chocolatey cornflake cakes to finish, mmm………….. :p 😀 😀

    jbritchford
    Participant

    Here is an idea;

    If US products are unsatisfactory, don’t buy them. If we are refused, cancel our order. We wouldn’t loose any workshare, as it is given to investors, which we are.
    The UK still has an aerospace industry, and given some extra funds could develop new aircraft that we need, such as a Harrier II instead of the JSF. We could also buy Rafale if we so wished, and I am sure the Russians have a few Su35s spare if we get desperate.

    On the nuclear issue, I say go it alone. We need a UK controlled deterrent, pure and simple.
    By the way, regarding the idea that the UK would sell off the US technology from the JSF if we were given it:

    If this is how you treat your best ally, who is willing to send off hundreds of her men and women to die in wars G.W.Bush wants to start on a whim, then what do you expect our reaction to be??? Its not just ungrateful, it shows that the US government has litttle regard for its international partners and is only out for what it can get and is prepared to $crew anyone to get it.

    I’m not anti American by any measure, but i speak as i find, and in this case I think the US government should wake up and do the right thing for a change.

    in reply to: Export F-35's are "substantially downgraded" #2569493
    jbritchford
    Participant

    I imagine the article simply wishes to point out that the procurement of the F35 may not be the best option for Australia. Then again, what are the other options? Might we see some Flankers sporting kangaroo roundalls in a few years? :diablo: 😀 😀

    in reply to: RAF Canberra in Kabul #2572141
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Thanks Dimitri, we all appreciate your efforts, fabulous pics!!!

    in reply to: Fleet's time is up, says Nelson #2573677
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Britchy: Mate I think you misunderstand mate, this is the Royal Australian Navy not the Royal Navy. Sorry for the confusion mate.

    Down here we don’t have the EH-101’s but the MRH-90’s are a good bet and this should see the RAN FAA with replacments of this type of helo sooner than the goverwas planing. With just five of these aircraft left you really must wonder how much use they can be now, especially when the fleet is mostly down due to maintanence problems.

    MRH-90’s with FADEC do seem to make more sence in terms of operational service.

    lol, thanks for clearing up the confusion, buddy 😀 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #344165
    jbritchford
    Participant

    A duck’s quack does echo, but it does so at a frequency that humans simply cannot hear.

    On a more interesting note:
    Maize, Rice and wheat (which feed the majority of the world), are all types of over-grown grass.

    in reply to: Did you know that? #1940573
    jbritchford
    Participant

    A duck’s quack does echo, but it does so at a frequency that humans simply cannot hear.

    On a more interesting note:
    Maize, Rice and wheat (which feed the majority of the world), are all types of over-grown grass.

    in reply to: Fleet's time is up, says Nelson #2573849
    jbritchford
    Participant

    The army is buying 12 MRH90s?

    Why do this when an indigenous heli (the EH101) is avaliable?

    in reply to: Norway to Back out of F-35 JSF Over Industrial Share #2575262
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Gripen would be a better buy for Norway anyway. Its cheaper and gives more value for money, and fulfills all the Norwegian needs.

    in reply to: General Discussion #347930
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Shame. Terrible, terrible shame. RIP

    in reply to: Linda Smith RIP #1941958
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Shame. Terrible, terrible shame. RIP

    in reply to: Bangladesh purchases 16 F-7BG's from China #2578062
    jbritchford
    Participant

    i agree with fabe. If a government can’t afford care for its own people, then it has no business buying espensive toys like these. Bangladesh faces no strategic threats at all, and i for one would much rather see the nearly $1billion they spend each year on defence on health, education and disaster relief.

    in reply to: Canada has built a new jet #2578097
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Shame its not a rebuilt Avro arrow!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 1,693 total)