How on earth is it possible to publish something like this in June 2017!?
Even reprinted in Scientific American: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-went-wrong-with-the-f-35-lockheed-martins-joint-strike-fighter/
Incredible!
The only way to make anything correctly and competitive is to choose nations who partner on the program, and send an RFP to different european manufacturers.. with firm requirements and a neutral way to estimate the compliance (if you just say everybody vote as you feel, you’ll have every nation choosing the one that gives them the most work, despite it being more or les appropriate.. that’s european politics). once a design has been chosen, they participate and pay for the development made by the winning bidder and that’s it… forget about making several production facilities that’ll negate any economy of scale…
Agree to the basic principle — however it is highly unlikely this will happen.
European defence industry should consolidate. They should arrange a 3-way competition between Airbus, Saab and Dassault for the future fighter; and do similar competition for other main weapons systems, e.g., future main battle tank. Europe is not big enough to support so many independent vendors.
I heard some rumors that Greece may consider NSM land-based batteries… anybody in Greece who has heard anything about this?
If France joined, it might also replace the French fighter jet, the Rafale, when that becomes obsolete in 2030, Handelsblatt said.
https://euobserver.com/economic/138193
Rafale obsolete in 2030?
Ahem… I don’t think so.
But does this imply that the Germans will consider Typhoon to be obsolete in 2030? Oforr are the Germans just grossly underestimating the French fighter program? (for whatever reason?)
Did Airbus release any drawings or give any hints at high-level specifications yet? Or even timelines?
It explains why the UK has joined the TF-X program.
I don’t think so…
The UK may join Japan instead…
France no doubt has the technical capabilities to design and build a follow-up to Rafale all by themselves. However the question is whether they are willing to spend so much money on it.
A “5. gen” a/c will most likely be more expensive to develop than Rafale, and Rafale was already at the limit of what France was willing to spend (at least that is the impression that I got).
Thus it seems to me that France will need to find a partner for the next fighter development. They could do like the UK and team up with a country outside of EU; e.g. India and their AMCA.
Germany and Spain clearly need more partners.
There are a couple plausible things he might have been referring to… either while accelerating in AB it is easy to push the plane supersonic without intending to, or perhaps if the F-35 is cruising at high subsonic and goes into a dive it can inadvertently go supersonic.
Good points — my brain was not working properly…
In either case it shows the F-35 doesn’t struggle to go supersonic.
Indeed.
But where do you get the “without” AB?
So are you suggesting they turn on AB without noticing? Do you really thing the F-35 user interface is that crappy?
The machine is so “smooth” that we must make new F-35 pilots specially aware of this. The F-35 will slip into a higher speed if you do not pay attention. That’s why it’s not uncommon that a pilot without meaning to do so ends up in supersonic speed!
Google translated from: https://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2017/06/02/f-35-og-luft-til-luft-rollen/
Hmm — does this not imply that the F-35 can potentially (and easiliy) go supersonic without using afterburner?
Another snippet:
I have been introduced to “El Gato” during the fall when he learned to fly F-35 with us. “Gato” is an experienced F / A-18 pilot who has gone through the weapons schools of both the US Marine Corps and the US Navy, also known as Top Gun. Let me quote El Gato, after his first flight in F-35A: “… it flies like a hornet, but with four engines …”. (In comparison, the F-18 usually has two engines). Or to quote one of my Italian colleagues, after his first taste of F-35: “I did not think performance like this was possible.” (Thus, in a positive sense.)
I wonder what the Italian pilot had been flying previously!?
In any case, there is no doubt that the F-35 will deliver on it’s promises, in all roles (including a2a). What an incredible machine.
Within the framework of the Famex 2017 Mexico Air Show , INFODEFENSA was able to chat with Fredrik Gustafson , Vice President of Marketing for Latin America at Saab , who discussed the relationship of this important global defense firm with its Mexican partners, an interview in which The Swedish executive spoke of the possibility of incorporating the Saab Jas-39 Gripen to the Mexican Air Force (FAM).
The public and many members of the aeronautics industry in Mexico consider the Gripen as an ideal solution for Mexico to jump from the F-5 to a superior technological platform.
Google translated from:
If Trump survives the next 4 years in WH it will significantly increase the probability of Germany increasing defence spending significantly… it will also increase the probability of Germany wanting to build capacities independent of the US… Together with Brexit it will also increase the push for a common EU defence structure; this in combination with France realizing that they will not be able to go it alone after Rafale, implies that Germany and France will aim to build a new manned a/c to replace Typhoon and Rafale. No doubt F-35 will replace at least some of the Tornadoes in Germany. But what will replace the Typhoon and Rafale? It could be F-35 but most likely they will try to develop their own plane.
What can kill this is of course the politicians — they will need to give more than what they are willing to (in terms of workshare), which could easily lead to another flop like the Typhoon.
Sweden may join them (unless they develop their own 5. gen with Brazil and/or India).
Speaking at an Army symposium last week, U.S. Pacific Command head Admiral Harry Harris revealed that the U.S. Army and the Japanese Ground Self Defense Force will sink a target ship (SINKEX) with shore-based anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCM) at next year’s Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC). Since at least last year, U.S. officials have advocated for ground forces to develop an anti-ship capability as part of the Multi-Domain Battle concept as a way to utilize services other than the U.S. Navy to exert sea-control in a hypothetical clash in the Western Pacific.
The U.S. Army will be firing the Naval Strike Missile (NSM), a multi-purpose, subsonic cruise missile designed by Norway’s Kongsberg and built in partnership with Raytheon.
Interesting… and potentially good news for Kongsberg.
Lockheed Martin has elected not to include its Long Range Anti-Ship Missile in the Navy’s competition to field an over-the-horizon missile for the Littoral Combat Ship and frigate, company officials confirmed to USNI News on Wednesday.
With Lockheed and Boeing both out of the competition, the only remaining contender for the OTH award is the Norwegian Naval Strike Missile.
https://news.usni.org/2017/05/24/lockheed-martin-drops-lrasm-frigate-missile-competition
Anybody but US companies would have a steep learning curve — OTOH the F-22 first flew in 1997… if we assume Japan/UK is 25 years behind then they should soon be ready to start building something comparable?
Or are they more than 25 years behind?
We should also keep in mind that building a VLO a/c is probably simpler today than it was 25 years ago, due to the overall improvements in materials technology etc.