Then they wonder why folks are Racists. I.M.H.O. they bring it upon themselves.
What!?! I didn’t know that Racism can be acceptable if they bring it on themselves. 😉
Then they wonder why folks are Racists. I.M.H.O. they bring it upon themselves.
What!?! I didn’t know that Racism can be acceptable if they bring it on themselves. 😉
ThreeSpool-
By converting drawings into digital format, do you mean copying them by scanning straight to disc, scanning them & then converting to CAD/CAM drawings, or redrawing them from scratch as CAD drawings ?.Bob T.
Bob, I meant redrawing them from scratch into a traditional 2D CAD drawing. My preferred way to go is to create a modern parametric model to derive the drawings.
Matt.
I agree with Moggy C. Lack of observation, coupled with a complete lack of patience results in the sort of driving seen out on British roads today. At the other end of the scale, those that rigidly following the Highway Code doesn’t make for a good driver. Middle lane hoggers are nuisance, but hardly the worst sort of driving seen out of the roads.
However, I have nothing good to say about the owners of 4×4 Pick-Ups, and that comes from someone driving a Disco.
I agree with Moggy C. Lack of observation, coupled with a complete lack of patience results in the sort of driving seen out on British roads today. At the other end of the scale, those that rigidly following the Highway Code doesn’t make for a good driver. Middle lane hoggers are nuisance, but hardly the worst sort of driving seen out of the roads.
However, I have nothing good to say about the owners of 4×4 Pick-Ups, and that comes from someone driving a Disco.
This is a topic that fascinates me. When I was at school we did a class on drafting/line drawing; and when I was at college, I got introduced into engineering drawings and CAD.
Now, this is going to sound particularly sad but I have long thought about taking the drawings and converting them into a digital format; much as what has been described, as a personal project. It isn’t the thought of saving drawings, but the process of drawing it out on the computer that interests me. However, the end result would benefit more than just myself.
The thing that stops me is not just the lack of time but what direction to take. Do you recreate the drawing as-is in a digital format, or do you recreate the whole aircraft as CAD-model and then derive new drawings. The first way would be somewhat easier, but the latter would through up a lot more discrepancies; and what to do with the discrepancies – stay true to the drawing (how do you know there isn’t an update drawing out there), adjust within tolerances, or go for what is looks best (and then you don’t preserve what was originally on the drawing.)
The other stumbling block is sharing the end work. It would be a trivial matter to allow access to drawings through a website. But, how best to protect myself from any legal concerns.
I’d classify “purposely untrue” as a different matter altogether, and a question of the integrity of the engineer. I’d also question what oversight, if any, the DGAC had on Kingfisher, or the engineering provider that Kingfisher used.
As far as mismatch between paperwork and aircraft; it would be the tedious process of checking part numbers and serial number specified on the paperwork and going to the aircraft and physically checking what is fitted. There will be a log at some point of what was fitted to the aircraft. It is case of tracing steps, what paperwork is there, and what information you can glean from other sources; tech logs, work orders, etc.
It really depends on how complete and accurate the paperwork has been. Going by the article, it doesn’t look promising. And, why I am saying it is an expensive process to put right.
It still doesn’t tell you why they can’t be flown. A journalist isn’t going to understand why it can’t fly; just that it currently can’t be flown. I fail to see how “ravaged” for parts = beyond repair. Unless, they have removed parts with saws, unlikely…:rolleyes:
As I said in my previous reply, it is more than likely to be an incomplete paper trail rather than the planes not physically be able to be flown again.
The worth of any aircraft is in the paperwork. If the paperwork is incomplete or missing, it is very expensive to get an aircraft flying again. If you can’t ascertain the history of a part, it would need to go for overhaul and have a new release certificate certifying if for use. Multiply the amount of rotable parts on an aircraft and you can see why it gets expensive. Is it cheaper than writing of the debt and selling the aircraft as scrap, who knows?
Although, young A318s have been scrapped for their parts, if that is an indication of how much the parts are worth vs the airframe.
I wonder if in the future we will see the same happen to Lion Air?
It reminds me a bit of Comet. Whilst an interesting livery, I don’t think it’s a good one. The titles look very wrong in a serif font.
It will if they paint the cowlings blue. 🙂
Agree fully, TonyT. Why are so many jobs needing to be duplicated? We need one, fairer parliament – without bias to one part of the country – that represents the needs of everyone in the country.
Agree fully, TonyT. Why are so many jobs needing to be duplicated? We need one, fairer parliament – without bias to one part of the country – that represents the needs of everyone in the country.
But it’s almost as if the Chancellor were someone is trying to distract our attention from something, isn’t it?
I wonder what it could be.
The same feeling I get about all the attention North Korea is getting in our news. 🙁
But it’s almost as if the Chancellor were someone is trying to distract our attention from something, isn’t it?
I wonder what it could be.
The same feeling I get about all the attention North Korea is getting in our news. 🙁